Suppr超能文献

N95 呼吸器的重复使用、消毒方法和微生物负担:一项随机对照试验。

N95 respirator reuse, decontamination methods, and microbial burden: A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA.

Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.

出版信息

Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Sep-Oct;42(5):103017. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103017. Epub 2021 Mar 31.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness and ease of N95 respirator decontamination methods in a clinic setting and to identify the extent of microbial colonization on respirators associated with reuse.

METHODS

In a prospective fashion, N95 respirators (n = 15) were randomized to a decontamination process (time, dry heat, or ultraviolet C light [UVC]) in outpatient clinics. Each respirator was re-used up to 5 separate clinic sessions. Swabs on each respirator for SARS-CoV-2, bacteria, and fungi were obtained before clinic, after clinic and post-treatment. Mask integrity was checked after each treatment (n = 68). Statistical analyses were performed to determine factors for positive samples.

RESULTS

All three decontamination processes reduced bacteria counts similarly. On multivariate mixed model analysis, there were an additional 8.1 colonies of bacteria (95% CI 5.7 to 10.5; p < 0.01) on the inside compared to the outside surface of the respirators. Treatment resulted in a decrease of bacterial load by 8.6 colonies (95% CI -11.6 to -5.5; p < 0.01). Although no decontamination treatment affected the respirator filtration efficiency, heat treatments were associated with the breakdown of thermoplastic elastomer straps. Contamination with fungal and SARS-CoV-2 viral particles were minimal to non-existent.

CONCLUSIONS

Time, heat and UVC all reduced bacterial load on reused N95 respirators. Fungal contamination was minimal. Heat could permanently damage some elastic straps making the respirators nonfunctional. Given its effectiveness against microbes, lack of damage to re-treated respirators and logistical ease, UVC represents an optimal decontamination method for individual N95 respirators when reuse is necessary.

摘要

目的

评估在诊所环境中 N95 呼吸器消毒方法的有效性和易用性,并确定与重复使用相关的呼吸器上微生物定植的程度。

方法

前瞻性地将 15 个 N95 呼吸器随机分配到门诊诊所的消毒过程(时间、干热或紫外线 C 光[UVC])中。每个呼吸器在 5 个不同的诊所会议中重复使用。在诊所前、诊所后和治疗后,对每个呼吸器上的 SARS-CoV-2、细菌和真菌拭子进行采样。在每次处理后检查口罩完整性(n=68)。进行统计分析以确定阳性样本的因素。

结果

三种消毒过程均能使细菌计数相似减少。在多变量混合模型分析中,与呼吸器的外表面相比,呼吸器内表面的细菌数量增加了 8.1 个菌落(95%CI 5.7 至 10.5;p<0.01)。治疗使细菌负荷减少了 8.6 个菌落(95%CI -11.6 至 -5.5;p<0.01)。虽然没有消毒处理会影响呼吸器的过滤效率,但热处理会导致热塑性弹性体表带破裂。真菌和 SARS-CoV-2 病毒颗粒的污染很少或不存在。

结论

时间、热和 UVC 均可减少重复使用的 N95 呼吸器上的细菌负荷。真菌污染很少。热可能会永久损坏一些弹性带,使呼吸器无法正常工作。鉴于其对微生物的有效性、对重新处理的呼吸器无损坏以及后勤便利性,UVC 代表了在需要重复使用时对单个 N95 呼吸器进行消毒的最佳方法。

相似文献

3
Decontamination Methods for Reuse of Filtering Facepiece Respirators.过滤式面罩呼吸器的重复使用消毒方法。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Aug 1;146(8):734-740. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.1423.

本文引用的文献

2
COVID-19 Pandemic: A New Chapter in the History of Infectious Diseases.新冠疫情:传染病历史的新篇章。
Oman Med J. 2020 Apr 21;35(2):e123. doi: 10.5001/omj.2020.41. eCollection 2020 Mar.
5
History in a Crisis - Lessons for Covid-19.危机中的历史——新冠疫情的教训
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1681-1683. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2004361. Epub 2020 Mar 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验