Department of Pain, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick.
School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Clin J Pain. 2021 Jun 1;37(6):421-428. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000938.
This study assessed the feasibility of administering a multidimensional, self-report pain assessment protocol to children in an inpatient, acute pain context, and sought insight into the interrelationships between sensory, affective, and evaluative pain dimensions.
A total of 132 children (5 to 16 y) experiencing acute pain were recruited from acute pain ward rounds or the short-stay surgical unit. A multidimensional self-report assessment protocol was administered, assessing pain intensity, pain-related affect, bother, perceived unfairness, and pain expectations (for tomorrow and in 1 wk). Duration of protocol administration was assessed and ease of administration was rated. Pain-related behaviors were rated using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) Scale.
The duration of protocol administration was <2.5 minutes, on average, for all age groups. Median ease of protocol administration was 7/10 for 5- to 7-year-olds and 8/10 for older age groups. Pain-related bother was higher for 14- to 16-year-olds, relative to younger age groups, and significantly correlated with perceived unfairness (r=0.59, P<0.01), intensity (r=0.76, P<0.01), and affect (r=0.33, P<0.05). For younger age groups, bother was significantly positively correlated only with pain intensity (rs=0.59 to 0.79, Ps<0.01) and affect (rs=0.4 to 0.71, Ps <0.05). A stepwise multiple regression analysis found multidimensional self-reported information (especially pain intensity and perceived unfairness), accounted for significant additional amount of variance, beyond that explained by age, pain duration, and observed pain behavior.
Sensory, affective, and evaluative aspects of children's clinical, acute pain experience may be assessed using self-report tools, which provide unique and valuable information about their pain experience.
本研究旨在评估在住院急性疼痛环境下对儿童进行多维自评疼痛评估方案的可行性,并深入了解感觉、情感和评价维度之间的相互关系。
共招募了 132 名(5-16 岁)经历急性疼痛的儿童,他们来自急性疼痛病房或短期手术病房。采用多维自评评估方案,评估疼痛强度、与疼痛相关的情感、困扰、不公平感和对明天及 1 周后的疼痛预期。评估方案的管理时间,并对管理的便利性进行评分。使用面部、腿部、活动、哭泣和安抚(FLACC)量表对疼痛相关行为进行评分。
各年龄组方案管理时间的平均值<2.5 分钟。5-7 岁儿童的方案管理便利性中位数为 7/10,年龄较大儿童的中位数为 8/10。14-16 岁儿童的疼痛困扰程度高于年龄较小的儿童,与不公平感(r=0.59,P<0.01)、强度(r=0.76,P<0.01)和情感(r=0.33,P<0.05)显著相关。对于年龄较小的儿童,困扰与疼痛强度(rs=0.59 至 0.79,Ps<0.01)和情感(rs=0.4 至 0.71,Ps<0.05)显著正相关。逐步多元回归分析发现,多维自评信息(尤其是疼痛强度和不公平感)可解释除年龄、疼痛持续时间和观察到的疼痛行为之外的更多的疼痛体验的差异。
可使用自评工具评估儿童临床急性疼痛体验的感觉、情感和评价方面,为其疼痛体验提供独特且有价值的信息。