Oliveira Pedro, Figueiredo Maria, Paes de Faria Vitória, Abreu Gabriela, Resende Janine
Internal Medicine Department, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, PRT.
Microbiology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, PRT.
Cureus. 2021 Mar 10;13(3):e13815. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13815.
is a gram-negative rod that is part of the commensal flora of dogs' mouths. Among splenectomized patients who maintain close contact with dogs, the bacteria can lead to infection and fulminant sepsis even without evidence of a skin breach. In this report, we describe the case of a 71-year-old woman who had undergone splenectomy 35 years ago. She came to our emergency department complaining of back pain, myalgia, asthenia, and a fever of 40.2ºC. No other symptoms were noted upon her admission. Blood workup revealed hyperlacticaemia, increased C-reactive protein, and lymphopenia. A urinalysis and chest radiography were ordered, with no abnormal findings, and the SARS-CoV-2 test was negative. The patient developed persistent hypotension and drowsiness that did not improve with intravenous fluids. Therefore, she was started on a norepinephrine infusion. Cultures were collected, and intravenous antibiotic therapy was started with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 2.2 mg and azithromycin 500 mg. Besides all the diagnostic tests, no infectious cause was found. On the second day of hospitalization, she started to deteriorate, and antibiotic therapy was escalated to piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g, resulting in a good clinical response. On the third day after admission, thanks to a group discussion, we were able to identify in the patient's blood cultures. A review of history revealed that the patient was in close contact with her pet dog. This case highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary discussion, including the microbiology team, in order to reach an uncommon diagnosis. When dealing with splenectomized individuals presenting with the septic shock of unclear origin, a history of close contact with dogs must lead clinicians to consider as a causative agent.
是一种革兰氏阴性杆菌,是狗口腔共生菌群的一部分。在与狗密切接触的脾切除患者中,即使没有皮肤破损的证据,这种细菌也可导致感染和暴发性败血症。在本报告中,我们描述了一名71岁女性的病例,她在35年前接受了脾切除术。她来到我们的急诊科,主诉背痛、肌痛、乏力和40.2℃的发热。入院时未发现其他症状。血液检查显示高乳酸血症、C反应蛋白升高和淋巴细胞减少。进行了尿液分析和胸部X线检查,未发现异常,严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2检测呈阴性。患者出现持续低血压和嗜睡,静脉输液后无改善。因此,开始给予去甲肾上腺素输注。采集了培养物,并开始静脉使用阿莫西林/克拉维酸2.2mg和阿奇霉素500mg进行抗生素治疗。除了所有诊断检查外,未发现感染原因。住院第二天,她病情开始恶化,抗生素治疗升级为哌拉西林/他唑巴坦4.5g,临床反应良好。入院后第三天,经过小组讨论,我们在患者的血培养中发现了[具体细菌名称未给出]。回顾病史发现患者与她的宠物狗密切接触。该病例强调了包括微生物学团队在内的多学科讨论对于做出罕见诊断的重要性。当处理不明原因感染性休克的脾切除患者时,与狗密切接触的病史必须使临床医生考虑[具体细菌名称未给出]作为病原体。