• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[家庭照顾者的高负担群体——聚类分析结果]

[Highly Burdened Groups of Family Caregivers - Results of a Cluster Analysis].

作者信息

Bohnet-Joschko Sabine, Bidenko Katharina

机构信息

Lehrstuhl für Management und Innovation im Gesundheitswesen, Universität Witten Herdecke, Witten, Deutschland.

出版信息

Gesundheitswesen. 2022 Jun;84(6):510-516. doi: 10.1055/a-1378-8897. Epub 2021 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1055/a-1378-8897
PMID:33860485
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to explore caregiving situations and to identify highly burdened caregiver groups.

METHODOLOGY

Survey data was collected from 1,429 family caregivers. Family caregivers were defined as relatives, friends, or neighbors who take care of and look after a person in need of care. Cluster analysis identified groups of family caregivers. Group differences were tested for statistical significance using the chi-squared test and analysis of variance.

RESULTS

Five groups of family caregivers were identified based on their caregiving tasks. Groups were characterized by the care situation (relationship to the person in need, intensity, and duration of care) and socio-demographic factors (gender, age, and employment). Groups differed in the perception of the care-related burden. While emotional burden was high in almost all groups, caregivers who provided everyday care reported high physical burden and those who provided continuous care over a long period reported high financial burden.

CONCLUSIONS

Caregivers are not a homogeneous group. They take on different roles and are exposed to various health and financial burdens. Information and services need to be addressed target group specifically. The presented typology supports health insurances and municipalities by enabling effective support approaches for highly burdened groups of family caregivers.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探索照护情况并识别负担较重的照护者群体。

方法

收集了1429名家庭照护者的调查数据。家庭照护者被定义为照顾有需要之人的亲属、朋友或邻居。聚类分析确定了家庭照护者群体。使用卡方检验和方差分析对组间差异进行统计学显著性检验。

结果

根据照护任务确定了五组家庭照护者。这些组的特征在于照护情况(与有需要之人的关系、照护强度和时长)以及社会人口学因素(性别、年龄和就业情况)。不同组在与照护相关的负担认知方面存在差异。虽然几乎所有组的情感负担都很重,但提供日常照护的照护者报告身体负担较重,而长期提供持续照护的照护者报告经济负担较重。

结论

照护者并非一个同质化群体。他们承担着不同的角色,并面临各种健康和经济负担。信息和服务需要针对特定目标群体提供。所呈现的类型划分通过为负担较重的家庭照护者群体提供有效的支持方法,为健康保险机构和市政当局提供了支持。

相似文献

1
[Highly Burdened Groups of Family Caregivers - Results of a Cluster Analysis].[家庭照顾者的高负担群体——聚类分析结果]
Gesundheitswesen. 2022 Jun;84(6):510-516. doi: 10.1055/a-1378-8897. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
2
The health and well-being of caregivers of children with cerebral palsy.脑瘫患儿照料者的健康与幸福。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):e626-36. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1689.
3
Effectiveness of interventions to improve family-staff relationships in the care of people with dementia in residential aged care: a systematic review protocol.改善老年护理机构中痴呆症患者护理中家庭与工作人员关系的干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):52-63. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2415.
4
[Burden experienced by caregiving relatives during the corona pandemic].[新冠疫情期间照顾亲属所经历的负担]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2022 Mar;55(2):136-142. doi: 10.1007/s00391-022-02026-6. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
5
Unmet Needs for Information and Support Among Military Caregivers.军事护理人员在信息和支持方面的未满足需求。
Mil Med. 2019 Dec 1;184(11-12):e922-e928. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz109.
6
Providing care to relatives with mental illness: reactions and distress among primary informal caregivers.为患有精神疾病的亲属提供照料:主要非正式照料者的反应与困扰
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Mar 25;16:80. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0786-9.
7
[Caregiver burden in relatives of persons with schizophrenia: an overview of measure instruments].[精神分裂症患者亲属的照顾者负担:测量工具概述]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):137-47.
8
Defining distinct caregiver subpopulations by intensity of end-of-life care provided.通过所提供的临终关怀强度来界定不同的照护者亚群体。
Palliat Med. 2009 Jan;23(1):66-79. doi: 10.1177/0269216308098793. Epub 2008 Nov 7.
9
A cluster analysis to explore the burden of primary caregivers of children with cancer in Oman.对阿曼癌症患儿主要照顾者负担的聚类分析。
J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2022 Jul;27(3):e12389. doi: 10.1111/jspn.12389. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
10
The moderating role of the amount of caregiving tasks on the relationships between dementia caregivers' characteristics and outcomes.照料任务量对痴呆症照料者特征与结果之间关系的调节作用。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Nov;74(11):2544-2554. doi: 10.1111/jan.13770. Epub 2018 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Views on the well-being of groups of informal caregivers. A cluster analysis using the example of Saxony.对非正式照料者群体福祉的看法。以萨克森州为例的聚类分析。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Dec 18;23(1):912. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02576-7.
2
[Development of an app to support in-home care consultation visits].[一款支持居家护理会诊的应用程序的开发]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2024 May;57(3):220-226. doi: 10.1007/s00391-023-02160-9. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
3
[More free time for me? Effects of a group intervention for informal caregivers based on routine data from the SVLFG long-term care insurance].
[我能有更多空闲时间吗?基于德国法定长期护理保险(SVLFG)常规数据的针对非正式照料者的团体干预效果]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2023 Oct;56(6):477-483. doi: 10.1007/s00391-022-02086-8. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
4
Supporting family care: a scoping app review.支持家庭护理:范围界定应用程序审查。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Jun 21;22(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01906-6.