Suppr超能文献

华盛顿州雇员中问责制医疗保健网络的一年影响。

The one-year impact of accountable care networks among Washington State employees.

机构信息

Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

The Leonard Davis Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug;56(4):604-614. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13656. Epub 2021 Apr 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the impact of a new, two-sided risk model accountable care network (ACN) on Washington State employees and their families.

DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Administrative data (January 2013-December 2016) on Washington State employees.

STUDY DESIGN

We compared monthly health care utilization, health care intensity as measured through proxy pricing, and annual HEDIS quality metrics between the five intervention counties to 13 comparison counties, analyzed separately by age categories (ages 0-5, 6-18, 19-26, 18-64).

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We used difference-in-difference methods and generalized estimating equations to estimate the effects after 1 year of implementation for adults and children.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

We estimate a 1-2 percentage point decrease in outpatient hospital visits due to the introduction of ACNs (adults: -1.8, P < .01; age 0-5: -1.2, P = .07; age 6-18: -1.2, P = .06; age 19-26; -1.2, P < .01). We find changes in primary and specialty care office visits; the direction of impact varies by age. Dependents age 19-26 were also responsive with inpatient admissions declines (-0.08 percentage points, P = .02). Despite changes in utilization, there was no evidence of changes in intensity of care and mixed results in the quality measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Washington's state employee ACN introduction changed health care utilization patterns in the first year but was not as successful in improving quality.

摘要

目的

评估一种新的、双边风险模型管理式医疗网络(ACN)对华盛顿州员工及其家属的影响。

数据来源/研究环境:华盛顿州员工的行政数据(2013 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月)。

研究设计

我们比较了五个干预县和 13 个对照县的每月医疗保健利用情况、通过代理定价衡量的医疗保健强度以及年度 HEDIS 质量指标,分别按年龄类别(0-5 岁、6-18 岁、19-26 岁、18-64 岁)进行分析。

数据收集/提取方法:我们使用差异法和广义估计方程来估计成年人和儿童实施后 1 年的影响。

主要发现

我们估计由于引入 ACN,门诊医院就诊量减少了 1-2 个百分点(成年人:-1.8,P<.01;0-5 岁:-1.2,P=.07;6-18 岁:-1.2,P=.06;19-26 岁:-1.2,P<.01)。我们发现初级和专科保健就诊量发生了变化;影响的方向因年龄而异。19-26 岁的受抚养人住院人数也有所下降(-0.08 个百分点,P=.02)。尽管利用情况发生了变化,但护理强度没有变化的证据,而且质量指标的结果喜忧参半。

结论

华盛顿州员工 ACN 的引入改变了第一年的医疗保健利用模式,但在提高质量方面并不成功。

相似文献

8
The impact of improving access to primary care.改善初级保健服务可及性的影响。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Dec;23(6):1451-1458. doi: 10.1111/jep.12821. Epub 2017 Oct 6.

本文引用的文献

4
Modeling Health Care Expenditures and Use.建模医疗保健支出和使用。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:489-505. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013517. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
5
Designing Difference in Difference Studies: Best Practices for Public Health Policy Research.设计双重差分研究:公共卫生政策研究的最佳实践。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:453-469. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013507. Epub 2018 Jan 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验