• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在过敏反应中使用多种肾上腺素剂量:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Use of multiple epinephrine doses in anaphylaxis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Allergy Service, Department of Paediatric Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Nov;148(5):1307-1315. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.03.042. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2021.03.042
PMID:33862009
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8588837/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Regulatory bodies recommend that all patients at risk of anaphylaxis be prescribed 2 epinephrine autoinjectors, which they should carry at all times. This is in contrast to some guidelines. The proportion of anaphylaxis reactions that are treated with multiple doses of epinephrine has not been systematically evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies reporting epinephrine treatment for anaphylaxis in which data relating to the number of doses administered were available.

METHODS

We searched the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for relevant studies reporting at least 10 anaphylaxis events (due to food or venom) from 1946 until January 2020. Data were extracted in duplicate for the meta-analysis, and the risk of bias was assessed. The study was registered under the PROSPERO identifier CRD42017069109.

RESULTS

A total of 86 studies (36,557 anaphylaxis events) met the inclusion criteria (20 of the studies [23%] were prospective studies; 64 [74%] reported reactions in the community, and 22 [26%] included food challenge data). Risk of bias was assessed as low in 50 studies. Overall, 7.7% of anaphylaxis events from any cause (95% CI = 6.4-9.1) were treated with multiple doses of epinephrine. When only epinephrine-treated reactions for which subsequent doses were administered by a health care professional were considered, 11.1% of food-induced reactions (95% CI = 9.4-13.2) and 17.1% of venom-induced reactions (95% CI = 11.3-25.0) were treated with more than 1 epinephrine dose. Heterogeneity was moderate to high in the meta-analyses, but at sensitivity analysis this estimate was not affected by study design or anaphylaxis definition.

CONCLUSION

Around 1 in 10 anaphylaxis reactions are treated with more than 1 dose of epinephrine.

摘要

背景

监管机构建议所有有发生过敏反应风险的患者都应配备 2 支肾上腺素自动注射器,并随时携带。这与一些指南的建议相反。尚未系统评估使用多次肾上腺素剂量治疗过敏反应的比例。

目的

我们旨在对发表的研究进行系统评价和荟萃分析,这些研究报告了可获得肾上腺素给药剂量数据的过敏反应治疗情况。

方法

我们检索了 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库,以查找自 1946 年至 2020 年 1 月至少报告了 10 例(因食物或毒液引起)过敏反应事件的相关研究。对荟萃分析进行了重复数据提取,并评估了偏倚风险。该研究在 PROSPERO 标识符 CRD42017069109 下进行了注册。

结果

共有 86 项研究(36557 例过敏反应事件)符合纳入标准(20 项研究[23%]为前瞻性研究;64 项[74%]报告了社区中的反应,22 项[26%]包括食物挑战数据)。50 项研究的偏倚风险评估为低。总体而言,任何原因引起的过敏反应事件中有 7.7%(95% CI=6.4-9.1)使用了多次肾上腺素剂量进行治疗。当仅考虑由医疗保健专业人员给予后续剂量的接受肾上腺素治疗的反应时,11.1%的食物诱导反应(95% CI=9.4-13.2)和 17.1%的毒液诱导反应(95% CI=11.3-25.0)使用了超过 1 剂肾上腺素。荟萃分析中的异质性为中度至高度,但在敏感性分析中,该估计值不受研究设计或过敏反应定义的影响。

结论

约 10%的过敏反应需要使用超过 1 剂肾上腺素进行治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d5e/8588837/27cd00cab365/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d5e/8588837/3c3e9da04f76/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d5e/8588837/86f15e3d5e4d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d5e/8588837/27cd00cab365/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d5e/8588837/3c3e9da04f76/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d5e/8588837/86f15e3d5e4d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d5e/8588837/27cd00cab365/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of multiple epinephrine doses in anaphylaxis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.在过敏反应中使用多种肾上腺素剂量:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Nov;148(5):1307-1315. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.03.042. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The Emperor Has No Symptoms: The Risks of a Blanket Approach to Using Epinephrine Autoinjectors for All Allergic Reactions.皇帝没有症状:对所有过敏反应一概使用肾上腺素自动注射器的风险。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016 Nov-Dec;4(6):1143-1146. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
4
Value of a Second Dose of Epinephrine During Anaphylaxis: A Patient/Caregiver Survey.在过敏反应中第二剂肾上腺素的价值:一项患者/照护者调查。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Sep-Oct;6(5):1559-1567. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.01.019. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
5
Epinephrine in Severe Allergic Reactions: The European Anaphylaxis Register.严重过敏反应中的肾上腺素:欧洲过敏登记处。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Nov-Dec;6(6):1898-1906.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.02.026. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
6
Predictors of Repeat Epinephrine Administration for Emergency Department Patients with Anaphylaxis.预测急诊过敏反应患者重复肾上腺素给药的因素。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015 Jul-Aug;3(4):576-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2015.04.009. Epub 2015 May 29.
7
A survey study of index food-related allergic reactions and anaphylaxis management.索引食物相关过敏反应和过敏管理的调查研究。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2012 Sep;23(6):582-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2012.01315.x. Epub 2012 May 25.
8
Use of multiple doses of epinephrine in food-induced anaphylaxis in children.多剂量肾上腺素在儿童食物诱导性过敏反应中的应用。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Jul;122(1):133-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.04.031. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
9
Small percentage of anaphylactic reactions treated with epinephrine during food challenges in Dutch children.在荷兰儿童的食物挑战中,接受肾上腺素治疗的过敏反应比例很小。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018 Mar;120(3):300-303. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.08.018. Epub 2017 Oct 7.
10
A systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis of specialist services and adrenaline auto-injectors in anaphylaxis.过敏性反应中专科服务和肾上腺素自动注射器的系统评价和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Apr;17(17):1-117, v-vi. doi: 10.3310/hta17170.

引用本文的文献

1
Lactate in Anaphylaxis: 100 Years On.过敏反应中的乳酸:百年回顾。
Sports Med. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1007/s40279-025-02273-8.
2
The Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor acalabrutinib aborts ongoing acute food-induced anaphylactic reactions in humanized mice.布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂阿卡拉布替尼可终止人源化小鼠中正在进行的急性食物诱导的过敏反应。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2025 Jul 17. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2025.07.003.
3
Emergency Monitoring Following A Diagnosis of Anaphylaxis.过敏反应诊断后的紧急监测

本文引用的文献

1
Differences in oral food challenge reaction severity based on increasing age in a pediatric population.基于儿童人口年龄增长的口腔食物挑战反应严重程度的差异。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Nov;127(5):562-567.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.05.013. Epub 2021 May 16.
2
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Epinephrine Autoinjector Risk Stratification for Patients with Food Allergy-One Epinephrine Autoinjector or Two?一文读懂食物过敏患者肾上腺素自动注射器的风险分层:一支好,还是两支好?
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Jun;9(6):2440-2451.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.01.007. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
3
Patient/parent administered epinephrine in acute anaphylaxis.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2025 Jul 8;25(1):29. doi: 10.1007/s11882-025-01210-z.
4
Exploring the anti-anaphylaxis potential of natural products: A Review.探索天然产物的抗过敏潜力:综述
Inflammopharmacology. 2025 Mar 19. doi: 10.1007/s10787-025-01685-2.
5
Cost-effectiveness of watchful waiting versus immediate emergency department transfer after epinephrine autoinjector use in Canada.加拿大肾上腺素自动注射器使用后观察等待与立即转至急诊科的成本效益分析
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2025 Jan 22;21(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13223-025-00951-w.
6
Anaphylactic Shock Caused by Eating Buckwheat.食用荞麦引起的过敏性休克。
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 4;13(17):5243. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175243.
7
Epinephrine autoinjectors for individuals with food allergy: Who, how many, and when to use.用于食物过敏个体的肾上腺素自动注射器:适用人群、使用数量及使用时机。
J Food Allergy. 2024 Jul 1;6(1):32-36. doi: 10.2500/jfa.2024.6.240004. eCollection 2024 Jul.
8
Development of , an Epinephrine Nasal Spray, for Severe Allergic Reactions.用于严重过敏反应的肾上腺素鼻喷雾剂的研发。
Pharmaceutics. 2024 Jun 14;16(6):811. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16060811.
9
Management of Refractory Anaphylaxis: An Overview of Current Guidelines.难治性过敏反应的管理:当前指南概述。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2024 Jul;54(7):470-488. doi: 10.1111/cea.14514. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
10
Management of Food Allergies and Food-Related Anaphylaxis.食物过敏和食物相关过敏反应的管理。
JAMA. 2024 Feb 13;331(6):510-521. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.26857.
患者/家长在急性过敏反应中自行给予肾上腺素。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;46:499-502. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.10.060. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
4
Epidemiological Study of Hospital Admissions for Food-Induced Anaphylaxis Using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination Database.基于日本诊断程序组合数据库的食物诱发过敏反应住院病例的流行病学研究
J Epidemiol. 2022 Apr 5;32(4):163-167. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20200309. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
5
World allergy organization anaphylaxis guidance 2020.世界过敏组织2020年过敏反应指南
World Allergy Organ J. 2020 Oct 30;13(10):100472. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100472. eCollection 2020 Oct.
6
Characteristics of Anaphylactic Reactions: A Prospective Observational Study in Japan.过敏性反应的特征:日本的一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;59(6):812-819. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.07.004. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
7
Food-induced anaphylaxis in infants, as compared to toddlers and preschool children in Turkey.土耳其婴幼儿与幼儿和学龄前儿童食物诱发过敏反应的比较。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2020 Nov;31(8):954-961. doi: 10.1111/pai.13320. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
8
Outcomes and Factors Associated With Prehospital Treatment of Pediatric Anaphylaxis.儿科过敏反应的院前治疗结果及相关因素。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2022 Jan 1;38(1):e69-e74. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002146.
9
Defining challenge-proven coexistent nut and sesame seed allergy: A prospective multicenter European study.定义经证实的坚果和芝麻同时过敏的挑战:一项前瞻性多中心欧洲研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Apr;145(4):1231-1239. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.09.036. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
10
Biphasic Reactions in Emergency Department Anaphylaxis Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.急诊科过敏反应患者的双相反应:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Apr;8(4):1230-1238. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.10.027. Epub 2019 Nov 6.