• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于儿童人口年龄增长的口腔食物挑战反应严重程度的差异。

Differences in oral food challenge reaction severity based on increasing age in a pediatric population.

机构信息

Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Nov;127(5):562-567.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.05.013. Epub 2021 May 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.anai.2021.05.013
PMID:34010700
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Food allergy reactions range from mild to severe with differences in age appearing to be an important factor associated with reaction severity.

OBJECTIVE

To define differences in oral food challenge (OFC) reaction severity in pediatric patients from infancy to adolescence using objective clinical outcomes and standardized reaction grading tools.

METHODS

Retrospective review of all positive OFC results at 2 large institutions between September 2016 and February 2019. Reaction severity was defined by presence of cardiovascular, neurologic, lower respiratory, or laryngeal symptoms, epinephrine requirement, and grading using 2 established food allergy reaction scales.

RESULTS

Infants and toddlers had fewer reactions involving cardiovascular, neurologic, lower respiratory, or laryngeal symptoms compared with older age groups. Epinephrine was also required less frequently during reactions in infants and toddlers, compared with older age groups. There was no difference in reaction severity in infants and toddlers based on clinical history of eczema. Increasing age was significantly correlated with increased epinephrine requirement (R = 0.12, P = .002), elevated Consortium of Food Allergy Research score (R = .012, P = .003), and approached significance for increased Practical Allergy score (R = .005, P = .05). History of asthma and sesame allergy were identified to be positively correlated with more severe reactions.

CONCLUSION

Infants and young toddlers have less severe reactions during OFCs compared with older age groups supporting early food introduction practices. In children under 12 months of age, severe reactions are most rare calling into question screening practices using specific allergy testing before food introduction. Standardized reaction grading tools may be valuable instruments to categorize reaction severity during OFCs.

摘要

背景

食物过敏反应的严重程度从轻度到重度不等,年龄差异似乎是与反应严重程度相关的一个重要因素。

目的

使用客观的临床结果和标准化的反应分级工具,定义从婴儿期到青春期的儿科患者口服食物挑战(OFC)反应严重程度的差异。

方法

对 2016 年 9 月至 2019 年 2 月期间在 2 家大型机构进行的所有阳性 OFC 结果进行回顾性分析。反应严重程度通过存在心血管、神经、下呼吸道或喉部症状、需要肾上腺素以及使用 2 种已建立的食物过敏反应量表进行分级来定义。

结果

婴儿和幼儿的反应中涉及心血管、神经、下呼吸道或喉部症状的情况比年龄较大的组少。与年龄较大的组相比,婴儿和幼儿在反应中也较少需要肾上腺素。根据湿疹的临床病史,婴儿和幼儿的反应严重程度没有差异。年龄的增加与肾上腺素的需求增加呈显著相关(R=0.12,P=0.002),与 Consortium of Food Allergy Research 评分升高呈正相关(R=0.012,P=0.003),与 Practical Allergy 评分升高呈正相关(R=0.005,P=0.05)。哮喘和芝麻过敏的病史被确定为与更严重的反应相关。

结论

与年龄较大的组相比,婴儿和幼儿在 OFC 中反应较轻,这支持早期食物引入的实践。在 12 个月以下的儿童中,严重反应最为罕见,这对使用特定过敏测试在食物引入前进行筛选的做法提出了质疑。标准化的反应分级工具可能是在 OFC 期间对反应严重程度进行分类的有价值的工具。

相似文献

1
Differences in oral food challenge reaction severity based on increasing age in a pediatric population.基于儿童人口年龄增长的口腔食物挑战反应严重程度的差异。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Nov;127(5):562-567.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.05.013. Epub 2021 May 16.
2
The severity of reaction after food challenges depends on the indication: A prospective multicenter study.食物激发试验后的反应严重程度取决于适应证:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2020 Feb;31(2):167-174. doi: 10.1111/pai.13140. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
3
Risk Factors for Severe Reactions during Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Food Challenges.双盲安慰剂对照食物激发试验期间严重反应的危险因素。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2017;172(3):173-182. doi: 10.1159/000458724. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
4
Increasing specific immunoglobulin E levels correlate with the risk of anaphylaxis during an oral food challenge.特异性免疫球蛋白 E 水平升高与口服食物激发试验期间发生过敏反应的风险相关。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2018 Jun;29(4):417-424. doi: 10.1111/pai.12896. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
5
A severity grading system of food-induced acute allergic reactions to avoid the delay of epinephrine administration.一种食物诱发的急性过敏反应严重程度分级系统,以避免延误肾上腺素的使用。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Oct;127(4):462-470.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.04.015. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
6
Epinephrine treatment is infrequent and biphasic reactions are rare in food-induced reactions during oral food challenges in children.肾上腺素治疗并不常见,在儿童口服食物激发试验中,食物诱发反应呈双相反应的情况也很少见。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Dec;124(6):1267-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.10.006.
7
Oral Food Challenges in Infants and Toddlers.婴幼儿口腔食物挑战。
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2019 Nov;39(4):481-493. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2019.07.003.
8
Small percentage of anaphylactic reactions treated with epinephrine during food challenges in Dutch children.在荷兰儿童的食物挑战中,接受肾上腺素治疗的过敏反应比例很小。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018 Mar;120(3):300-303. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.08.018. Epub 2017 Oct 7.
9
Severity and threshold of peanut reactivity during hospital-based open oral food challenges: An international multicenter survey.基于医院的口服食物激发试验中花生反应的严重程度和阈值:一项国际多中心调查。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2018 Nov;29(7):754-761. doi: 10.1111/pai.12959. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
10
Epinephrine use in positive oral food challenges performed as a screening test for food allergy therapy trials.肾上腺素在作为食物过敏治疗试验筛查测试的口服食物激发试验中的应用。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015 May-Jun;3(3):424-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2014.10.008. Epub 2015 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Oral Immunotherapy Should Play a Key Role in Preschool Food Allergy Management.口服免疫疗法应在学龄前儿童食物过敏管理中发挥关键作用。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2025 Apr;55(4):294-306. doi: 10.1111/cea.70013. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
2
Natural history of sesame allergy in pediatric patients: Insight from a retrospective analysis.儿科患者芝麻过敏的自然病史:一项回顾性分析的见解
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2025 Jan;36(1):e70022. doi: 10.1111/pai.70022.
3
Milk ladder: Who? When? How? Where? with the lowest risk of reaction.牛奶进阶引入法:何人?何时?如何?何地?以将过敏反应风险降至最低。
Front Allergy. 2024 Dec 6;5:1516774. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2024.1516774. eCollection 2024.
4
Oral food challenge test results of patients with food allergy with specific IgE levels >100 UA/ml.特异性IgE水平>100 UA/ml的食物过敏患者的口服食物激发试验结果
Biomed Rep. 2024 Sep 30;21(6):178. doi: 10.3892/br.2024.1866. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Patient selection for milk and egg ladders using a food ladder safety checklist.使用食物阶梯安全检查表进行牛奶和鸡蛋阶梯的患者选择。
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2022 Jun 12;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13223-022-00696-w.
6
Risk factors for severe reactions in food allergy: Rapid evidence review with meta-analysis.食物过敏严重反应的危险因素:快速证据综述与荟萃分析。
Allergy. 2022 Sep;77(9):2634-2652. doi: 10.1111/all.15318. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
7
Use of multiple epinephrine doses in anaphylaxis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.在过敏反应中使用多种肾上腺素剂量:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Nov;148(5):1307-1315. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.03.042. Epub 2021 Apr 20.