Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health & Human Sciences; and (2)Departments of Dermatology and Anatomy, Cell Biology, & Physiology, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Departments of Dermatology and Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Division of Biomedical Sciences, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Marian University, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Physiology and Saha Cardiovascular Research Center, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Auton Neurosci. 2021 Jul;233:102809. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2021.102809. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
Local neuronal circuits in non-glabrous skin drive the initial increase of the biphasic cutaneous vasodilation response to fast non-noxious heating. Voltage-sensitive Na (NaV) channel inhibition blocks the afferent limb of the non-glabrous forearm cutaneous axon reflex. Slow local heating does not engage this response. These mechanisms have not been adequately investigated or extended into areas associated with flushing pathology. We hypothesized that despite regional differences in sensory afferents, both sensory blockade and slowing the heating rate would abate the cutaneous axon reflex-mediated vasodilator responses in facial skin. We measured skin blood flow responses (laser-Doppler flowmetry) of 6 healthy subjects (5 female) to non-noxious forearm, cheek, and forehead local heating, expressed as a percentage of cutaneous vascular conductance at plateau (CVC = flux/mean arterial pressure). We assessed CVC during fast (1 °C/30s) and slow (1 °C/10 min) local heating to 43 °C in both NaV inhibition (topical 2.5% lidocaine/prilocaine) and control conditions. NaV inhibition decreased forearm (control: 84 ± 4, block: 34 ± 9%plateau, p < 0.001) and trended toward decreased forehead (control: 90 ± 3, block: 68 ± 3%plateau, p = 0.057) initial CVC peaks but did not alter cheek responses (control: 90 ± 3, block: 92 ± 13%plateau, p = 0.862) to fast heating. Slow heating eliminated the initial CVC peak incidence for all locations, and we observed similar results with combined slow heating and NaV inhibition. Slower sensory afferent activation rate eliminated the axon reflex response in facial and non-glabrous skin, but topical sensory blockade did not block axon reflex responses in flushing-prone cheek skin. Thus, slower heating protocols are needed to abate facial, particularly cheek, axon reflex responses.
非无毛皮肤中的局部神经元回路驱动双相皮肤血管扩张反应对快速非伤害性加热的初始增加。电压敏感的 Na(NaV)通道抑制阻断非无毛前臂皮肤轴突反射的传入支。缓慢的局部加热不会引发这种反应。这些机制尚未得到充分研究或扩展到与潮红病理相关的区域。我们假设,尽管感觉传入存在区域差异,但感觉阻断和降低加热速率都会减轻面部皮肤中的皮肤轴突反射介导的血管扩张反应。我们测量了 6 名健康受试者(5 名女性)的皮肤血流反应(激光多普勒流量测量),分别为非伤害性前臂、脸颊和前额局部加热,以达到平台时的皮肤血管传导率(CVC=通量/平均动脉压)的百分比表示。我们评估了 NaV 抑制(局部 2.5%利多卡因/丙胺卡因)和对照条件下快速(1°C/30s)和缓慢(1°C/10min)加热至 43°C 时的 CVC。NaV 抑制降低了前臂(对照:84±4%,阻滞:34±9%平台,p<0.001)和额头(对照:90±3%,阻滞:68±3%平台,p=0.057)初始 CVC 峰值的趋势,但没有改变脸颊的反应(对照:90±3%,阻滞:92±13%平台,p=0.862)快速加热。缓慢加热消除了所有部位的初始 CVC 峰值发生,并且我们在缓慢加热和 NaV 抑制联合使用时观察到类似的结果。较慢的感觉传入激活率消除了面部和非无毛皮肤中的轴突反射反应,但局部感觉阻断并没有阻断潮红倾向的脸颊皮肤中的轴突反射反应。因此,需要较慢的加热方案来减轻面部,特别是脸颊,轴突反射反应。