• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种社会中友谊和优点对儿童资源分配的影响。

The influence of friendship and merit on children's resource allocation in three societies.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94705, USA.

CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 2021 Aug;208:105149. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105149. Epub 2021 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105149
PMID:33862530
Abstract

Recent work has suggested that principles of fairness that seem like natural laws to the Western mind, such as sharing more of the spoils with those who contributed more, can in fact vary significantly across populations. To build a better understanding of the developmental roots of population differences with respect to fairness, we investigated whether 7-year-old children (N = 432) from three cultural backgrounds-Kenya, China, and Germany-consider friendship and merit in their distribution of resources and how they resolve conflicts between the two. We found that friendship had considerable and consistent influence as a cross-culturally recurrent motivation: children in all three cultures preferentially shared with a friend rather than with a neutral familiar peer. On the other hand, the role of merit in distribution seemed to differ cross-culturally: children in China and Germany, but not in Kenya, selectively distributed resources to individuals who worked more. When we pitted friendship against merit, there was an approximately even split in all three cultures between children who favored the undeserving friend and children who shared with the hard-working neutral individual. These results demonstrate commonalities and variability in fairness perceptions across distinct cultures and speak to the importance of cross-cultural research in understanding the development of the human mind.

摘要

最近的研究表明,在西方思维中看似自然法则的公平原则,例如根据贡献程度分配更多的成果,实际上在不同人群中可能存在显著差异。为了更好地理解公平方面的人口差异的发展根源,我们调查了来自三个文化背景(肯尼亚、中国和德国)的 7 岁儿童(N=432)是否会考虑友谊和功绩在资源分配中的作用,以及他们如何解决两者之间的冲突。我们发现,友谊作为一种跨文化反复出现的动机具有相当大的影响:所有三个文化背景的儿童都更愿意与朋友分享,而不是与中立的熟人分享。另一方面,功绩在分配中的作用似乎在跨文化上存在差异:中国和德国的儿童,但肯尼亚的儿童没有,会有选择地将资源分配给更努力工作的人。当我们将友谊与功绩进行比较时,所有三个文化背景中的儿童大约各占一半,他们有的更喜欢不称职的朋友,有的则与努力工作的中立个体分享。这些结果表明,在不同的文化中,公平感知存在共性和变异性,这表明跨文化研究对于理解人类思维的发展非常重要。

相似文献

1
The influence of friendship and merit on children's resource allocation in three societies.三种社会中友谊和优点对儿童资源分配的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2021 Aug;208:105149. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105149. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
2
Friendship trumps neediness: The impact of social relations and others' wealth on preschool children's sharing.友谊胜过需求:社会关系和他人财富对学龄前儿童分享行为的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Jun;146:106-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
3
Friendship is more than strategic reciprocity: Preschoolers' selective sharing with friends cannot be reduced to strategic concerns.友谊不仅仅是策略性互惠:学龄前儿童对朋友的选择性分享不能归结为策略性考虑。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2021 Jun;206:105101. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105101. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
4
Children's consideration of collaboration and merit when making sharing decisions in private.儿童在私下做出分享决定时对合作和功绩的考量。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 Apr;228:105609. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105609. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
5
The emergence of young children's tolerance for inequality: With age, children stop showing numerically sensitive fairness.儿童容忍不平等的出现:随着年龄的增长,儿童不再表现出对数量敏感的公平性。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2024 Feb;238:105785. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105785. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
6
The normative status of friendship: Do young children enforce sharing with friends and appreciate reasonable partiality?友谊的规范地位:幼儿是否会强迫朋友分享并欣赏合理的偏袒?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Jun;194:104826. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104826. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
7
The impact of social relationships on children's distributive justice.社会关系对儿童分配公正的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2020 Jan;56(1):103-116. doi: 10.1037/dev0000855. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
8
Fair Is Not Fair Everywhere.公平并非在所有地方都能实现。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Aug;26(8):1252-60. doi: 10.1177/0956797615586188. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
9
Fairness in children's resource allocation depends on the recipient.儿童资源分配的公平性取决于接受者。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Aug;20(8):944-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02378.x. Epub 2009 Jun 8.
10
Children's recognition of fairness and others' welfare in a resource allocation task: Age related changes.儿童在资源分配任务中对公平和他人福利的认知:与年龄相关的变化。
Dev Psychol. 2016 Aug;52(8):1307-17. doi: 10.1037/dev0000134.

引用本文的文献

1
Distributive fairness during the transition to adolescence: The role of peer comparison and social value orientation.向青春期过渡期间的分配公平:同伴比较和社会价值取向的作用。
Psych J. 2025 Feb;14(1):118-130. doi: 10.1002/pchj.800. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
2
Is Distributional Justice Equivalent to Prosocial Sharing in Children's Cognition?儿童认知中的分配正义等同于亲社会分享吗?
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 12;13:888028. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.888028. eCollection 2022.
3
Cross-cultural differences in early expectations about third party resource distribution.
第三方资源分配的早期期望中的跨文化差异。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 8;12(1):11627. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15766-7.