• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Is Distributional Justice Equivalent to Prosocial Sharing in Children's Cognition?儿童认知中的分配正义等同于亲社会分享吗?
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 12;13:888028. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.888028. eCollection 2022.
2
Fair sharing is just caring: Links between justice sensitivity and distributive behavior in middle childhood.公平分享就是关爱:儿童中期正义感与分配行为之间的联系。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 Feb;226:105561. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105561. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
3
Preschoolers' generosity increases with understanding of the affective benefits of sharing.随着对分享带来的情感益处的理解,学龄前儿童的慷慨程度会增加。
Dev Sci. 2017 May;20(3). doi: 10.1111/desc.12417. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
4
Preschoolers' social experiences and empathy-based responding relate to their fair resource allocation.学龄前儿童的社会经历和基于同理心的反应与他们公平的资源分配有关。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Sep;161:202-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.005. Epub 2017 May 10.
5
The role of personal values in children's costly sharing and non-costly giving.个人价值观在儿童高成本分享和低成本给予中的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Jan;165:117-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Apr 22.
6
Behavioral and sociocognitive correlates of ratings of prosocial behavior and sociometric status.亲社会行为评分与社会测量地位的行为及社会认知相关因素
J Genet Psychol. 1988 Mar;149(1):5-15. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1988.10532133.
7
The influence of socioeconomic status and appearance-reality understanding on pre-schoolers' sharing and generosity.社会经济地位和外貌-现实理解对学前儿童分享和慷慨行为的影响。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2023 Nov;41(4):325-342. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12451. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
8
Preschoolers' sharing expectations towards friends relate to their kindergarten peer status.学龄前儿童对朋友的分享期望与他们在幼儿园的同伴地位有关。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2020 Mar;38(1):1-14. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12300. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
9
The origins of infants' fairness concerns and links to prosocial behavior.婴儿公平意识的起源及其与亲社会行为的联系。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2018 Apr;20:117-121. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
10
The moral, or the story? Changing children's distributive justice preferences through social communication.道德还是故事?通过社会交往改变儿童的分配公正偏好。
Cognition. 2020 Dec;205:104441. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104441. Epub 2020 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Sharing and Allocation in Preschool Children: The Roles of Theory of Mind, Anticipated Emotions, and Consequential Emotions.学前儿童的分享与分配:心理理论、预期情绪和结果情绪的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Oct 11;14(10):931. doi: 10.3390/bs14100931.

本文引用的文献

1
Toddlers' expectations of third-party punishments and rewards following an act of aggression.幼儿在攻击行为后的第三方奖惩预期。
Aggress Behav. 2021 Sep;47(5):521-529. doi: 10.1002/ab.21979. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
2
The influence of friendship and merit on children's resource allocation in three societies.三种社会中友谊和优点对儿童资源分配的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2021 Aug;208:105149. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105149. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
3
Friendship is more than strategic reciprocity: Preschoolers' selective sharing with friends cannot be reduced to strategic concerns.友谊不仅仅是策略性互惠:学龄前儿童对朋友的选择性分享不能归结为策略性考虑。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2021 Jun;206:105101. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105101. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
4
Neural basis for egalitarian sharing in five-to six-year-old children.五岁至六岁儿童平等分享的神经基础。
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Apr 16;154:107787. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107787. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
5
Why do preschoolers perpetuate inequalities? Theoretical perspectives on inequity preferences in the face of emerging concerns for equality.为什么学龄前儿童会延续不平等?面对新出现的平等问题,关于不公平偏好的理论观点。
Dev Rev. 2020 Dec;58:100933. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2020.100933.
6
How do toddlers evaluate defensive actions toward third parties?幼儿如何评估针对第三方的防御行为?
Infancy. 2020 Nov;25(6):910-926. doi: 10.1111/infa.12367. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
7
Children are sensitive to reputation when giving to both ingroup and outgroup members.儿童在向群体内成员和群体外成员给予时都对声誉很敏感。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Jun;194:104814. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104814. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
8
Costly fairness in children is influenced by who is watching.儿童的昂贵公平受到观察者的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2020 Apr;56(4):773-782. doi: 10.1037/dev0000888. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
9
The development of social comparisons and sharing behavior across 12 countries.12 个国家社会比较和分享行为的发展。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Apr;192:104778. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104778. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
10
The impact of social relationships on children's distributive justice.社会关系对儿童分配公正的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2020 Jan;56(1):103-116. doi: 10.1037/dev0000855. Epub 2019 Nov 25.

儿童认知中的分配正义等同于亲社会分享吗?

Is Distributional Justice Equivalent to Prosocial Sharing in Children's Cognition?

作者信息

Zhu Yuning, Zhang Jingmiao, Liu Xiuli

机构信息

School of Psychology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China.

School of Educational Science and Technology, Anshan Normal University, Anshan, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 12;13:888028. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.888028. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.888028
PMID:35903728
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9315223/
Abstract

Distribution and sharing are social preference behaviors supported and shaped by selection pressures, which express individuals' concern for the welfare of others. Distributive behavior results in distributive justice, which is at the core of moral justice. Sharing is a feature of the prosocial realm. The connotations of distribution and sharing are different, so the principles, research paradigms, and social functions of the two are also different. Three potential causes of confusion between the two in the current research on distribution and sharing are discussed. First, they share common factors in terms of individual cognition, situation, and social factors. Second, although they are conceptually different, prosocial sharing and distribution fairness sensitivity are mutually predictive in individual infants. Similarly, neural differences in preschoolers' perception of distribution fairness predict their subsequent sharing generosity. Finally, similar activation regions are relevant to distribution and sharing situations that need behavioral control on a neural basis.

摘要

分配和分享是受选择压力支持和塑造的社会偏好行为,这些行为表达了个体对他人福祉的关心。分配行为产生分配正义,而分配正义是道德正义的核心。分享是亲社会领域的一个特征。分配和分享的内涵不同,因此两者的原则、研究范式和社会功能也不同。本文讨论了当前分配与分享研究中两者混淆的三个潜在原因。第一,它们在个体认知、情境和社会因素方面有共同因素。第二,尽管亲社会分享和分配公平敏感性在概念上不同,但在个体婴儿中它们相互预测。同样,学龄前儿童对分配公平的感知中的神经差异预测了他们随后的分享慷慨程度。最后,类似的激活区域与在神经基础上需要行为控制的分配和分享情境相关。