NMAHP-RU, University of Stirling, .
School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 28;10(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01570-9.
Mental health problems are common in the working population and represent a growing concern internationally, with potential impacts on workers, organisations, workplace health and compensation authorities, labour markets and social policies. Workplace interventions that create workplaces supportive of mental health, promote mental health awareness, destigmatise mental illness and support those with mental disorders are likely to improve health and economical outcomes for employees and organisations. Identifying factors associated with successful implementation of these interventions can improve intervention quality and evaluation, and facilitate the uptake and expansion. Therefore, we aim to review research reporting on the implementation of mental health promotion interventions delivered in workplace settings, in order to increase understanding of factors influencing successful delivery.
A scoping review will be conducted incorporating a stepwise methodology to identify relevant literature reviews, primary research and grey literature. This review is registered with Research Registry (reviewregistry897). One reviewer will conduct the search to identify English language studies in the following electronic databases from 2008 through to July 1, 2020: Scopus, PROSPERO, Health Technology Assessments, PubMed, Campbell Collaboration, Joanna Briggs Library, PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL and Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH). Reference searching, Google Scholar, Grey Matters, IOSH and expert contacts will be used to identify grey literature. Two reviewers will screen title and abstracts, aiming for 95% agreement, and then independently screen full texts for inclusion. Two reviewers will assess methodological quality of included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and extract and synthesize data in line with the RE-AIM framework, Nielson and Randall's model of organisational-level interventions and Moore's sustainability criteria, if the data allows. We will recruit and consult with international experts in the field to ensure engagement, reach and relevance of the main findings.
This will be the first systematic scoping review to identify and synthesise evidence of barriers and facilitators to implementing mental health promotion interventions in workplace settings. Our results will inform future evaluation studies and randomised controlled trials and highlight gaps in the evidence base.
Research Registry ( reviewregistry897 ).
心理健康问题在工作人群中很常见,是国际上日益关注的问题,可能会对员工、组织、工作场所健康和赔偿机构、劳动力市场和社会政策产生影响。在工作场所实施干预措施,营造支持心理健康的工作环境,提高心理健康意识,消除精神疾病污名化,支持患有精神障碍的员工,可能会改善员工和组织的健康和经济结果。确定与这些干预措施成功实施相关的因素,可以提高干预措施的质量和评估,并促进其采用和扩展。因此,我们旨在审查报告在工作场所实施心理健康促进干预措施的研究,以增加对影响成功实施的因素的理解。
将进行范围界定审查,采用逐步方法确定相关文献综述、原始研究和灰色文献。本审查已在 Research Registry(reviewregistry897)上注册。一名审查员将进行搜索,以确定 2008 年至 2020 年 7 月 1 日期间以下电子数据库中的英文研究:Scopus、PROSPERO、卫生技术评估、PubMed、坎贝尔协作、乔安娜·布里格斯图书馆、PsycINFO、Web of Science 核心合集、CINAHL 和职业安全与健康研究所(IOSH)。参考文献搜索、Google Scholar、灰色物质、IOSH 和专家联系将用于确定灰色文献。两名审查员将筛选标题和摘要,目标是达到 95%的一致性,然后独立筛选全文以确定纳入情况。如果数据允许,两名审查员将使用混合方法评估工具评估纳入研究的方法学质量,并根据 RE-AIM 框架、尼尔森和兰德尔的组织层面干预模型以及摩尔的可持续性标准提取和综合数据。我们将招募并咨询该领域的国际专家,以确保主要发现的参与度、覆盖面和相关性。
这将是第一项系统的范围界定审查,旨在确定和综合工作场所实施心理健康促进干预措施的障碍和促进因素的证据。我们的研究结果将为未来的评估研究和随机对照试验提供信息,并突出证据基础中的差距。
Research Registry(reviewregistry897)。