Department of General Surgery, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Department of General Surgery, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021 Jul;17(7):1334-1343. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.03.001. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has been widely used for type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients with overweight or obesity. However, the long-term outcomes of RYGB versus medical therapy have not been well compared.
To evaluate the long-term outcomes of RYGB versus medical therapy for patients with T2D.
University-affiliated hospital, China.
Four electronic databases-PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov-were searched for articles published through February 2021. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials.
Of 7 randomized controlled trials (15 articles), 477 patients were included: 239 were randomly divided into RYGB groups and 238 to medical therapy groups. Statistically higher rates of T2D remission were observed in RYGB groups at 1 year (relative risk [RR], 18.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.53- 71.70; P < .0001), 3 years (RR, 29.58; 95% CI, 5.92-147.82; P < .0001), and 5 years (RR, 16.92; 95% CI, 4.15-69.00; P < .0001). Meanwhile, statistically higher rates of achieving the American Diabetes Association's (ADA's) treatment goal were observed in RYGB groups at 1 year (RR, 3.99; 95% CI, 1.01-15.82; P = .05), 2 years (RR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.62- 5.48; P = .0004), 3 years (RR, 3.16; 95% CI, 1.33-7.49; P = .009), and 5 years (RR, 6.18; 95% CI, 1.69-22.68; P = .006).
This meta-analysis indicated that RYGB led to higher rates of T2D remission than medical therapy at 1, 3, and 5 years, as well as higher rates of achieving ADA's composite goal at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years.
Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术(RYGB)已广泛应用于超重或肥胖的 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者。然而,RYGB 与药物治疗的长期效果尚未得到很好的比较。
评估 RYGB 与药物治疗 T2D 患者的长期效果。
中国大学附属医院。
检索了截至 2021 年 2 月发表的文章,共检索了 4 个电子数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆和 ClinicalTrials.gov)。纳入的研究为随机对照试验。
共纳入 7 项随机对照试验(15 篇文章),477 例患者:239 例随机分为 RYGB 组,238 例分为药物治疗组。RYGB 组在 1 年(相对风险 [RR],18.01;95%置信区间 [CI],4.53-71.70;P <.0001)、3 年(RR,29.58;95% CI,5.92-147.82;P <.0001)和 5 年(RR,16.92;95% CI,4.15-69.00;P <.0001)时 T2D 缓解率更高。同时,RYGB 组在 1 年(RR,3.99;95% CI,1.01-15.82;P =.05)、2 年(RR,2.98;95% CI,1.62-5.48;P =.0004)、3 年(RR,3.16;95% CI,1.33-7.49;P =.009)和 5 年(RR,6.18;95% CI,1.69-22.68;P =.006)时达到美国糖尿病协会(ADA)治疗目标的比例更高。
这项荟萃分析表明,RYGB 在 1、3 和 5 年时比药物治疗更能提高 T2D 的缓解率,在 1、2、3 和 5 年时达到 ADA 综合目标的比例也更高。