Population Health Unit National Institute of Gastroenterology "Saverio de Bellis," Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy.
Ambulatori Multisito per la cura del sovrappeso e dell'obesità, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Mar 8;106(3):922-933. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa737.
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are the bariatric procedures most commonly used for the management of obesity. Whether one or the other is associated with a higher chance of remission of type 2 diabetes (T2D) is unclear.
This work aims to compare the efficacy of RYGB and SG for T2D remission at 1, 3, and 5 years after surgery.
Four databases were searched until January 2020.
Randomized controlled studies with at least 12 months of follow-up of patients with T2D allocated to RYGB or SG were selected.
To ensure uniformity, broad and narrow criteria for T2D remission were defined. The number of patients achieving remission of T2D at each assessment was extracted. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.
Ten studies were included, evaluating 778 patients. The overall prevalence of achievement of broad and narrow criteria for T2D remission was 73% and 53% at the 1-year, 60% and 48% at the 3-year, and 51% and 43% at the 5-year assessment. Compared to SG, RYGB was associated with a higher chance of achieving broad and narrow criteria for remission at 1 year after surgery (risk ratio [RR] = 1.34 vs RR = 1.22) and broad criteria for remission at 5 years (RR = 1.18). No other differences were found.
The present meta-analysis suggests a more favorable effect of RYGB than SG on achieving T2D remission in the short-term only, although the evidence currently available does not clarify whether differences in this outcome are confirmed long term or fade thereafter.
胃旁路术(RYGB)和袖状胃切除术(SG)是用于肥胖症管理的最常见减重手术。RYGB 和 SG 哪一种手术与 2 型糖尿病(T2D)缓解的几率更高尚不清楚。
本研究旨在比较 RYGB 和 SG 在手术后 1、3 和 5 年时对 T2D 缓解的疗效。
从 2020 年 1 月前检索了四个数据库。
选择了至少随访 12 个月的 T2D 患者接受 RYGB 或 SG 的随机对照研究。
为了确保一致性,定义了 T2D 缓解的广义和狭义标准。从每个评估中提取达到 T2D 缓解的患者数量。使用随机效应模型对数据进行汇总。
纳入了 10 项研究,共评估了 778 名患者。广义和狭义 T2D 缓解标准的总体缓解率在 1 年时分别为 73%和 53%,在 3 年时分别为 60%和 48%,在 5 年时分别为 51%和 43%。与 SG 相比,RYGB 在手术后 1 年时达到广义和狭义 T2D 缓解标准的几率更高(风险比 [RR] = 1.34 比 RR = 1.22)和广义缓解标准在 5 年时(RR = 1.18)。没有发现其他差异。
本荟萃分析表明,与 SG 相比,RYGB 在短期内对 T2D 缓解的效果更好,尽管目前的证据尚不清楚这种结果差异是否在长期内得到确认或此后是否会消失。