互动质量量化量表的信效度检验
Reliability and Validity Testing of the Quantified Quality of Interaction Schedule.
作者信息
Resnick Barbara, Galik Elizabeth, Paudel Anju, McPherson Rachel, Van Haitsma Kimberly, Kolanowski Ann, Boltz Marie, Ellis Jeanette, Eshraghi Karen, Behrens Liza, Zhu Shijun, Breman Rachel Blankstein
机构信息
University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD
University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD.
出版信息
J Nurs Meas. 2021 Aug 1;29(2):E95-E109. doi: 10.1891/JNM-D-19-00101. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Quality of Interactions Schedule (QuIS) using a quantification scoring approach.
METHODS
Baseline data from the Evidence Integration Triangle for Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (EIT-4-BPSD) study was used.
RESULTS
A total of 553 residents participated. There was evidence of inter-rater reliability with Kappa scores of .86 to 1.00 and internal consistency based on the Rasch analysis (item reliability of .98). There was some support for validity based on item fit and hypothesis testing as resistiveness to care was significantly associated with total QuIS scores.
CONCLUSION
This study supports the use of the quantified QuIS to evaluate the quality of interactions over time and to test interventions to improve interactions.
摘要
背景与目的
本研究旨在使用量化评分方法检验互动质量量表（QuIS）的信度和效度。
方法
使用来自痴呆行为和心理症状证据整合三角（EIT-4-BPSD）研究的基线数据。
结果
共有553名居民参与。有证据表明评分者间信度良好，Kappa值在0.86至1.00之间，基于拉施分析的内部一致性良好（项目信度为0.98）。基于项目拟合和假设检验，有一些效度支持，因为护理抵抗与QuIS总分显著相关。
结论
本研究支持使用量化的QuIS来评估一段时间内的互动质量，并测试改善互动的干预措施。
相似文献
1
Reliability and Validity Testing of the Quantified Quality of Interaction Schedule.互动质量量化量表的信效度检验
J Nurs Meas. 2021 Aug 1;29(2):E95-E109. doi: 10.1891/JNM-D-19-00101. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
2
Reliability and Validity of the Care Plan Checklist for Evidence of Person-Centered Approaches for Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms Associated With Dementia.《用于痴呆相关行为和心理症状的以患者为中心的方法的证据的护理计划检查表的信度和效度》。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Jul;19(7):613-618. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.10.021. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
3
Measurement properties of the 12-item Short Form Health Survey version 2 in Australians with lung cancer: a Rasch analysis.12 项简明健康量表第二版在澳大利亚肺癌患者中的测量性能：一项 Rasch 分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 May 31;19(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01794-w.
4
Reliability and Validity of the Knowledge of Person-Centered Behavioral Approaches for BPSD Test.针对 BPSD 测试的以患者为中心的行为方法知识的可靠性和有效性。
J Nurs Meas. 2020 Dec 1;28(3):472-488. doi: 10.1891/JNM-D-19-00016. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
5
Reliability and Validity of the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia and Invariance Between Black Versus White Residents in Nursing Homes.养老院中痴呆患者 Cornell 抑郁量表的信度和效度及其在黑人和白人居民间的不变性。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Jul;23(7):1236-1241.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.11.016. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
6
Reliability and Validity Testing of the Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia Scale.晚期痴呆症生活质量量表的信度和效度测试。
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2018 Aug;33(5):277-283. doi: 10.1177/1533317518765133. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
7
The Revised Index for Social Engagement in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Psychometric Study.《长期护理机构社会参与度修订指数：一项心理测量学研究》
J Nurs Res. 2017 Jun;25(3):216-223. doi: 10.1097/JNR.0000000000000156.
8
Testing the evidence integration triangle for implementation of interventions to manage behavioral and psychological symptoms associated with dementia: Protocol for a pragmatic trial.测试用于实施管理与痴呆相关的行为和心理症状干预措施的证据整合三角模型：一项实用试验方案
Res Nurs Health. 2018 Jun;41(3):228-242. doi: 10.1002/nur.21866. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
9
Scalability and internal consistency of the German version of the dementia-specific quality of life instrument QUALIDEM in nursing homes - a secondary data analysis.养老院中痴呆症特异性生活质量工具 QUALIDEM 的德语版本的可扩展性和内部一致性 - 二次数据分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Jun 5;11:91. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-91.
10
Validation of an 8-item Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS-8) for people with schizophrenia in China.中国精神分裂症患者 8 项康复评定量表（RAS-8）的验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Apr 13;19(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01763-3.
引用本文的文献
1
Factors associated with eating performance in nursing home residents living with dementia and other comorbidities.与患有痴呆症和其他合并症的养老院居民进食表现相关的因素。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Nov 15;24(1):946. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05540-x.
2
Racial differences in the quality of care interactions among nursing home residents with dementia.患有痴呆症的养老院居民在护理互动质量方面的种族差异。
Ethn Health. 2025 Jan;30(1):120-131. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2024.2417392. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
3
The association between patient engagement and quality of care interactions among acute care patients with dementia.痴呆急性护理患者的患者参与度与护理质量交互作用的关联。
Geriatr Nurs. 2024 May-Jun;57:117-122. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2024.04.002. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
4
Clinical factors associated with the quality of interactions between staff and hospitalized older patients with dementia.与医护人员和住院老年痴呆症患者互动质量相关的临床因素。
Geriatr Nurs. 2023 Nov-Dec;54:54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2023.08.025. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
5
Gender differences in interactions and depressive symptoms among hospitalized older patients living with dementia.住院痴呆老年患者互动与抑郁症状的性别差异
J Women Aging. 2023 Sep-Oct;35(5):476-486. doi: 10.1080/08952841.2022.2146972. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
6
Factors Associated With the Quality of Staff-Resident Interactions in Assisted Living.与辅助生活中员工-居民互动质量相关的因素。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2022;37(2):168-175. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000593.
7
A Description of Staff-resident Interactions in Assisted Living.辅助生活中员工与居民的互动描述。
Clin Nurs Res. 2021 Jun;30(5):690-698. doi: 10.1177/1054773820974146. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
8
Testing the Impact of FFC-AL-EIT on Psychosocial and Behavioral Outcomes in Assisted Living.测试 FFC-AL-EIT 在辅助生活中对心理社会和行为结果的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Feb;69(2):459-466. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16886. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
本文引用的文献
1
Preparing Long-Term Care Staff to Meet the Needs of Aging Persons With Serious Mental Illness.为满足严重精神疾病老年患者的需求，对长期护理人员进行培训。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Jun;20(6):683-688. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.03.018. Epub 2019 May 2.
2
Testing the evidence integration triangle for implementation of interventions to manage behavioral and psychological symptoms associated with dementia: Protocol for a pragmatic trial.测试用于实施管理与痴呆相关的行为和心理症状干预措施的证据整合三角模型：一项实用试验方案
Res Nurs Health. 2018 Jun;41(3):228-242. doi: 10.1002/nur.21866. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
3
Impact of person-centred care training and person-centred activities on quality of life, agitation, and antipsychotic use in people with dementia living in nursing homes: A cluster-randomised controlled trial.以人为主的照护训练和活动对养老院老年痴呆患者生活质量、激越和抗精神病药物使用的影响：一项整群随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2018 Feb 6;15(2):e1002500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002500. eCollection 2018 Feb.
4
Reliability, feasibility, and validity of the quality of interactions schedule (QuIS) in acute hospital care: an observational study.急性医院护理中互动质量量表（QuIS）的信度、可行性和效度：一项观察性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 31;17(1):380. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2312-2.
5
Voicing Ageism in Nursing Home Dementia Care.养老院痴呆症护理中的年龄歧视发声
J Gerontol Nurs. 2017 Sep 1;43(9):16-20. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20170523-02. Epub 2017 May 30.
6
Association of a Communication Training Program With Use of Antipsychotics in Nursing Homes.一项沟通培训项目与疗养院中抗精神病药物使用的关联
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jun 1;177(6):846-853. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0746.
7
The association of eating performance and environmental stimulation among older adults with dementia in nursing homes: A secondary analysis.养老院中患有痴呆症的老年人进食表现与环境刺激之间的关联：一项二次分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Jun;71:70-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
8
Evaluation of the 'Ladder to the Moon, Culture Change Studio Engagement Programme' staff training: Two quasi-experimental case studies.评价“月亮梯，文化变革工作室参与计划”员工培训：两项准实验案例研究。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2017 Sep;12(3). doi: 10.1111/opn.12147. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
9
Inter-rater reliability of the QuIS as an assessment of the quality of staff-inpatient interactions.作为评估医护人员与住院患者互动质量的工具，《住院患者互动质量量表》（QuIS）的评分者间信度。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Dec 7;16(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0266-4.
10
Reliability and Validity of the Resistiveness to Care Scale Among Cognitively Impaired Older Adults.认知障碍老年人护理抗拒量表的信效度研究
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jan;18(1):59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
Zotero 插件