Suppr超能文献

T1成像中单次激发与恢复方法的比较。

A comparison of one-shot and recovery methods in T1 imaging.

作者信息

Crawley A P, Henkelman R M

机构信息

Ontario Cancer Institute, University of Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Magn Reson Med. 1988 May;7(1):23-34. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910070104.

Abstract

Spin-lattice (T1) relaxation times are conventionally estimated using inversion recovery or saturation recovery sequences. Such "recovery" methods are limited in magnetic resonance imaging by the long times required to collect multiple points along the T1 relaxation curve. This problem can be overcome by the use of "one-shot" methods, which collect all points along the relaxation curve in a single excitation. We have compared the relative efficiency of these methods, on the basis of the signal-to-noise ratio obtained in the calculated T1 image from an exam time of fixed duration. We have found that a one-shot method using stimulated echoes has a poor efficiency. However, a method based on a technique first proposed by Look and Locker has an efficiency that is almost equal to the inversion recovery method and therefore possesses highly favorable properties for T1 imaging.

摘要

自旋晶格(T1)弛豫时间通常使用反转恢复或饱和恢复序列来估计。在磁共振成像中,此类“恢复”方法受到限制,因为需要很长时间才能沿着T1弛豫曲线采集多个点。使用“单次激发”方法可以克服这个问题,该方法在一次激发中采集弛豫曲线上的所有点。我们根据在固定时长的检查时间内从计算得到的T1图像中获得的信噪比,比较了这些方法的相对效率。我们发现,使用受激回波的单次激发方法效率较低。然而,一种基于Look和Locker首次提出的技术的方法,其效率几乎与反转恢复方法相当,因此对于T1成像具有非常有利的特性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验