Kahaly George J, Douglas Raymond S, Holt Robert J, Sile Saba, Smith Terry J
Department of Medicine I, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021 Jun;9(6):360-372. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00056-5. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
Thyroid eye disease manifests inflammation and treatment-resistant proptosis and diplopia. Teprotumumab, an insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor inhibiting monoclonal antibody, was approved in the USA on Jan 21, 2020, on the basis of two randomised trials. In this analysis we evaluated the short-term and long-term aggregate response to teprotumumab from the two trials, focusing on proptosis and diplopia.
We analysed integrated outcomes and follow-up data from two randomised, double-masked, placebo-controlled, multicentre, trials done at a total of 28 academic referral tertiary specialised centres offering joint thyroid eye clinics, or orbital clinics or practices, or both, in Europe and the USA. Participants were adult patients with a diagnosis of Graves' disease and active moderate-to-severe thyroid eye disease (clinical activity score [CAS] ≥4). Patients received eight intravenous infusions of either teprotumumab (10 mg/kg body weight for the first infusion, 20 mg/kg for subsequent infusions) or placebo every 3 weeks. The final study visit was at week 24, 3 weeks after the final infusion. In our analysis, the prespecified primary outcome was the between-group difference from baseline to week 24 in the proportion of patients with a proptosis response (≥2 mm reduction in the study eye without similar deterioration in the fellow eye at week 24) stratified by tobacco non-use and current use. Secondary endpoints at week 24 were the proportion of patients with improved diplopia (≥1 Bahn-Gorman grade), an overall response (reduction of ≥2 mm in proptosis and reduction of ≥2 points in CAS), mean change from baseline in proptosis measurement in the study eye, mean change from baseline in Graves' ophthalmopathy quality of life (GO-QOL) questionnaire scores (overall, visual functioning, and appearance), and the proportion of patients with disease inactivation (ie, a CAS score of 0 or 1). We also assessed data for the primary and secondary outcomes by patient subgroups (tobacco use; age <65 years or older; sex; time to diagnosis; CAS score 4 or 5, or 6 or 7; and thyrotropin binding inhibiting immunoglobulin [TBII] concentration <10 IU/L or ≥10 IU/L) versus placebo. Additional outcomes included short-term and long-term responses at 7 weeks and 51 weeks after the final dose, and post-hoc assessments of disease severity (more severe baseline disease defined as proptosis ≥3 mm or constant or inconstant diplopia, or both, as compared with all others), and an ophthalmic composite outcome (improvement in ≥1 eye from baseline without deterioration in either eye in ≥2 of the following: absence of eyelid swelling; CAS ≥2; proptosis ≥2 mm; lid aperture ≥2 mm; diplopia disappearance or grade change; or improvement of 8 degrees of globe motility). All outcome endpoint analyses were done by intention-to-treat (ITT) except where noted.
The pooled ITT population consisted of 84 patients assigned teprotumumab and 87 assigned placebo. More patients receiving teprotumumab achieved a reduction of at least 2 mm in proptosis at week 24 versus placebo (65 [77%] of 84 patients assigned teprotumumab vs 13 [15%] assigned placebo; stratified treatment difference 63%, 95% CI 51-75; p<0·0001). Numbers-needed-to-treat (NNT) were 1·6 for proptosis response, 2·5 for diplopia response (treatment difference 39%, 95% CI 23-55), 1·7 for overall response (treatment difference 60%, 48-72), and 2·5 for disease inactivation (treatment difference 40%, 27-53); all p <0·0001. The post-hoc assessment of the composite outcome showed that it was reached by 68 (81%) patients in the teprotumumab group and 38 (44%) in the placebo group (NNT 2·5, treatment difference 40%, 95% CI 26-53; p<0·0001). There were significantly more proptosis responders with teprotumumab in all subgroups at week 24; the number of diplopia responders was also significantly higher with teprotumumab for all subgroups except tobacco users and patients with TBII less than 10 IU/L at baseline. Integrated treatment differences for proptosis ranged from 47% in tobacco users (95% CI 21-73, p=0·0015; NNT=2·1) to 83% in patients aged 65 years and older (60-100, p<0·0001; NNT=1·2), and for diplopia ranged from 29% in tobacco users (95% CI -3 to 62, p=0·086; NNT=3·4) to 47% in those with baseline CAS of 6 or 7 (95% CI 23-71, p=0·0002; NNT=2·1). All other integrated subgroup results were p≤0·033. Integrated responses were observed at 7 weeks and 51 weeks after final dose for proptosis in 62 (87%) of 71 patients and 38 (67%) of 57 patients respectively; for diplopia in 38 (66%) of 58 and 33 (69%) of 48 respectively; and for the composite outcome in 66 (92%) of 72 and 48 (83%) of 58, respectively. During the 24-week study, compared with placebo, there were moderate-to-large improvements with teprotumumab for GO-QOL total scores (19 vs 6, p<0·0001), visual scores (20 vs 7, p=0·0003), and appearance scores (18 vs 6, p=0·0003), respectively, which were maintained during follow-up. Of all adverse events during the treatment period, 63 (94%) of 67 patients with teprotumumab and 59 (98%) of 60 patients with placebo were mild to moderate (grade 1 or 2), with three (4%) serious adverse events related or possibly related to teprotumumab of diarrhoea, infusion reaction, and Hashimoto's encephalopathy (co-incident with confusion) leading to study discontinuation. Of the most commonly reported adverse events with teprotumumab, muscle spasm (18%, 95% CI 7·3-28·7), hearing loss (10%), and hyperglycaemia (8%, 1·7-15·0) had the greatest risk difference from placebo.
Teprotumumab markedly improved the clinical course of thyroid eye disease in all patient subgroups examined from the two trials, with most patients maintaining responses in the long-term. Analyses of the effect of teprotumumab retreatment on non-responders and those who flare after response, as well as further studies in a broader population of thyroid eye disease are ongoing.
Horizon Therapeutics.
甲状腺眼病表现为炎症以及难治性眼球突出和复视。替普罗单抗是一种抑制胰岛素样生长因子-1受体的单克隆抗体,基于两项随机试验于2020年1月21日在美国获批。在本分析中,我们评估了这两项试验中替普罗单抗的短期和长期总体反应,重点关注眼球突出和复视。
我们分析了两项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心试验的综合结果和随访数据,这些试验在欧洲和美国的28个学术转诊三级专科中心进行,这些中心设有联合甲状腺眼病诊所、眼眶诊所或科室,或两者皆有。参与者为诊断为格雷夫斯病且患有活动性中重度甲状腺眼病(临床活动评分[CAS]≥4)的成年患者。患者每3周接受8次静脉输注替普罗单抗(首次输注剂量为10mg/kg体重,后续输注剂量为20mg/kg)或安慰剂。最终研究访视在第24周,即最后一次输注后3周。在我们的分析中,预先设定的主要结局是按不吸烟和当前吸烟情况分层的,从基线到第24周时出现眼球突出反应(研究眼突出度降低≥2mm且对侧眼在第24周无类似恶化)的患者比例的组间差异。第24周的次要终点包括复视改善(≥1个巴恩-戈尔曼等级)的患者比例、总体反应(眼球突出度降低≥2mm且CAS降低≥2分)、研究眼中眼球突出度测量相对于基线的平均变化、格雷夫斯眼病生活质量(GO-QOL)问卷评分(总体、视觉功能和外观)相对于基线的平均变化,以及疾病失活(即CAS评分为0或1)的患者比例。我们还按患者亚组(吸烟情况;年龄<65岁或≥65岁;性别;诊断时间;CAS评分4或5,或6或7;促甲状腺素结合抑制免疫球蛋白[TBII]浓度<10IU/L或≥10IU/L)与安慰剂对比评估了主要和次要结局的数据。其他结局包括最后一剂后7周和51周的短期和长期反应,以及事后对疾病严重程度的评估(与所有其他情况相比,更严重的基线疾病定义为眼球突出≥3mm或持续性或间歇性复视,或两者皆有),以及眼科综合结局(与基线相比,至少1只眼改善且以下至少2项中任何一只眼无恶化:无眼睑肿胀;CAS≥2;眼球突出≥2mm;睑裂≥2mm;复视消失或等级改变;或眼球活动度改善8度)。除另有说明外,所有结局终点分析均采用意向性分析(ITT)。
ITT合并人群包括84例分配接受替普罗单抗治疗的患者和87例分配接受安慰剂治疗的患者。与安慰剂相比,接受替普罗单抗治疗的患者在第24周时更多达到眼球突出度至少降低2mm(84例分配接受替普罗单抗治疗的患者中有65例[77%],而分配接受安慰剂治疗的患者中有13例[15%];分层治疗差异为63%,95%CI为51%-75%;p<0.0001)。眼球突出反应的治疗所需人数(NNT)为1.6,复视反应为2.5(治疗差异39%,95%CI为23%-55%),总体反应为1.7(治疗差异60%,48%-72%),疾病失活为2.5(治疗差异40%,27%-53%);所有p<0.0001。事后对综合结局的评估显示,替普罗单抗组68例(81%)患者达到该结局,安慰剂组38例(44%)患者达到该结局(NNT为2.5,治疗差异40%,95%CI为26%-53%;p<0.0001)。在第24周时,替普罗单抗治疗的所有亚组中眼球突出反应者明显更多;除吸烟患者和基线TBII低于10IU/L的患者外,替普罗单抗治疗的所有亚组中复视反应者也明显更多。眼球突出的综合治疗差异范围从吸烟患者的47%(95%CI为21%-73%,p=0.0015;NNT=2.1)到65岁及以上患者的83%(60%-100%,p<0.0001;NNT=1.2),复视的差异范围从吸烟患者的29%(95%CI为-3%至62%,p=0.086;NNT=3.4)到基线CAS为6或7的患者的47%(95%CI为23%-71%,p=0.0002;NNT=2.1)。所有其他综合亚组结果的p≤0.033。在最后一剂后7周和51周分别观察到71例患者中的62例(87%)和57例患者中的38例(67%)出现眼球突出的综合反应;复视分别为58例中的38例(66%)和48例中的33例(69%);综合结局分别为72例中的66例(92%)和58例中的48例(83%)。在为期24周的研究中,与安慰剂相比,替普罗单抗使GO-QOL总分(19分对6分,p<0.0001)、视觉评分(20分对7分,p=0.0003)和外观评分(18分对6分,p=0.0003)有中度至大幅改善,且在随访期间得以维持。在治疗期间的所有不良事件中,67例接受替普罗单抗治疗的患者中有63例(94%)和60例接受安慰剂治疗的患者中有59例(98%)为轻度至中度(1级或2级),有3例(4%)严重不良事件与替普罗单抗相关或可能相关,分别为腹泻、输液反应和桥本脑病(伴有意识模糊),导致研究中断。替普罗单抗最常报告的不良事件中,肌肉痉挛(18%,95%CI为7.3%-28.7%)、听力丧失(10%)和高血糖(8%,1.7%-15.0%)与安慰剂的风险差异最大。
替普罗单抗在两项试验中所检查的所有患者亚组中均显著改善了甲状腺眼病的临床病程,大多数患者长期维持反应。正在进行替普罗单抗再治疗对无反应者和反应后病情复发者的影响分析,以及在更广泛的甲状腺眼病患者群体中的进一步研究。
地平线治疗公司。