Bendich Ilya, Vigdorchik Jonathan M, Sharma Abhi K, Mayman David J, Sculco Peter K, Anderson Chris, Della Valle Alejandro Gonzalez, Su Edwin P, Jerabek Seth A
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jun;37(6):1124-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.085. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
Robotic-assistance total hip arthroplasty (RA-THA) and computer navigation THA (CN-THA) have been shown to improve accuracy of component positioning compared to manual techniques; however, controversy exists regarding clinical benefit. Moreover, these technologies may expose patients to risks. The purpose of this study is to compare rates of intraoperative fracture and complications requiring reoperation within 1 year for posterior approach RA-THA, CN-THA, and THA with no technology (Manual-THA).
In total, 13,802 primary, unilateral, elective, posterior approach THAs (1770 RA-THAs, 3155 CN-THAs, and 8877 Manual-THAs) were performed at a single institution between 2016 and 2020. Intraoperative fractures and reoperations within 1 year of the index procedure were identified. Cohorts were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weight based on age, gender, body mass index, femoral cementation, history of spine fusion, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Logistic regression was performed to create odds ratios for complications. Additional regression analysis for dislocation was performed, adjusting for dual mobility and femoral head size.
There were no differences in intraoperative fracture and postoperative complication rates between the groups (P = .521). RA-THA had a 0.3 odds ratio (95% confidence interval 0.1-0.9, P = .046) compared to Manual-THA for reoperation due to dislocation. CN-THA had an odds ratio of 3.0 for reoperation due to dislocation (95% confidence interval 0.8-11.3, P = .114) compared to RA-THA. The remaining complication odds ratios, including those for infection, loosening, dehiscence, and "other" were similar between the groups.
RA-THA is associated with lower risk of revision for dislocation within 1 year of index surgery, when compared to Manual-THA performed through the posterior approach.
与手动技术相比,机器人辅助全髋关节置换术(RA-THA)和计算机导航全髋关节置换术(CN-THA)已被证明可提高假体定位的准确性;然而,关于其临床益处仍存在争议。此外,这些技术可能会使患者面临风险。本研究的目的是比较后入路RA-THA、CN-THA和无技术辅助的全髋关节置换术(手动THA)在1年内的术中骨折率和需要再次手术的并发症发生率。
2016年至2020年期间,在一家机构共进行了13802例初次、单侧、择期后入路全髋关节置换术(1770例RA-THA、3155例CN-THA和8877例手动THA)。确定了初次手术1年内的术中骨折和再次手术情况。根据年龄、性别、体重指数、股骨骨水泥固定、脊柱融合病史和Charlson合并症指数,使用治疗权重的逆概率对队列进行平衡。进行逻辑回归以得出并发症的比值比。对脱位进行了额外的回归分析,并对双动型和股骨头大小进行了调整。
各组之间的术中骨折率和术后并发症发生率无差异(P = 0.521)。与手动THA相比,RA-THA因脱位而再次手术的比值比为0.3(95%置信区间0.1-0.9,P = 0.046)。与RA-THA相比,CN-THA因脱位而再次手术的比值比为3.0(95%置信区间0.8-11.3,P = 0.114)。其余并发症的比值比,包括感染、松动、裂开和“其他”并发症,在各组之间相似。
与通过后入路进行的手动THA相比,RA-THA在初次手术后1年内因脱位而翻修的风险较低。