• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

福岛第一核电站周边采集的污染土壤中铀的吸附-解吸系数

Sorption-desorption coefficients of uranium in contaminated soils collected around Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station.

作者信息

Kasar S, Mishra S, Sahoo S K, Kavasi N, Omori Y, Arae H, Sorimachi A, Aono T

机构信息

Environmental Radionuclides Research Group, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST), 4-9-1Anagawa, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan.

Environmental Radionuclides Research Group, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST), 4-9-1Anagawa, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan; Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, 400085, India.

出版信息

J Environ Radioact. 2021 Jul;233:106617. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2021.106617. Epub 2021 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2021.106617
PMID:33866199
Abstract

Various radionuclides including fission products and heavy nuclides were released into the environment during the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (FDNPS) accident. The dissolution followed by migration of deposited radionuclides of Cs, Sr and U on soils could take place to the local environment. Therefore, it is necessary to determine sorption-desorption coefficients of U in soil-water system around the FDNPS from a migration viewpoint. The determination of sorption coefficient K(S) as well as desorption coefficient K(D) for U has been carried out in the present study using a laboratory batch method. Stable U was used for sorption from simulated ground water onto contaminated soil samples collected from Okuma Town, Fukushima. Different soil parameters were measured to understand their effects on sorption and desorption processes. The obtained K(S) and K(D) values of U were compared with values of K(S) and K(D) of Cs and Sr and K(S)-U in known Fukushima accident contaminated soils reported in the literature for better understanding. It was observed that K(S)-U varied from 160 to 5100 L/kg, whereas K(D)-U ranged from 200 to 11000 L/kg. K(D) was higher than K(S) for U in these soils implying irreversibility of the sorption process. Pearson's correlation of K(S) values suggested that U sorption is affected by various soil parameters. However, desorption is decided by the nature of U species formed in sorption process and soil parameters like pH, presence of carbonates, Ca ions, clay minerals etc. to some extent. The comparison between K(S) and K(D) values for Cs, Sr and U revealed that unsorbed Sr could migrate farther than unsorbed Cs or U under the present experimental conditions. Both sorption and desorption studies are of great importance to understand migration of metal ions from contaminated sites to local uncontaminated areas.

摘要

在福岛第一核电站事故期间,包括裂变产物和重核素在内的各种放射性核素被释放到环境中。沉积在土壤上的铯、锶和铀等放射性核素会发生溶解,随后迁移到当地环境中。因此,从迁移的角度来看,有必要确定福岛第一核电站周边土壤 - 水系统中铀的吸附 - 解吸系数。本研究采用实验室批量法测定了铀的吸附系数K(S)和解吸系数K(D)。使用稳定的铀从模拟地下水中吸附到从福岛大熊町采集的受污染土壤样品上。测量了不同的土壤参数,以了解它们对吸附和解吸过程的影响。将获得的铀的K(S)和K(D)值与文献中报道的已知福岛事故污染土壤中铯和锶的K(S)和K(D)值以及K(S)-U进行比较,以便更好地理解。观察到K(S)-U在160至5100 L/kg之间变化,而K(D)-U在200至11000 L/kg之间。在这些土壤中,铀的K(D)高于K(S),这意味着吸附过程具有不可逆性。K(S)值的皮尔逊相关性表明,铀的吸附受各种土壤参数的影响。然而,解吸在一定程度上取决于吸附过程中形成的铀物种的性质以及土壤参数,如pH值、碳酸盐的存在、钙离子、粘土矿物等。铯、锶和铀的K(S)和K(D)值的比较表明,在当前实验条件下,未吸附的锶比未吸附的铯或铀迁移得更远。吸附和解吸研究对于理解金属离子从污染场地向当地未受污染区域的迁移都非常重要。

相似文献

1
Sorption-desorption coefficients of uranium in contaminated soils collected around Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station.福岛第一核电站周边采集的污染土壤中铀的吸附-解吸系数
J Environ Radioact. 2021 Jul;233:106617. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2021.106617. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
2
Measurement of uranium isotope ratios in Fukushima-accident contaminated soil samples using multi collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry.采用多接收电感耦合等离子体质谱法测量福岛事故污染土壤样品中的铀同位素比值。
J Environ Radioact. 2021 Jun;232:106568. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2021.106568. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
3
Measurement of uranium distribution coefficient and U/U ratio in soils affected by Fukushima dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident.福岛第一核电站事故影响土壤中铀分配系数和U/U比的测量
J Environ Radioact. 2019 Mar;198:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2018.12.019. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
4
Influence of non-equilibrium sorption on the vertical migration of Cs in forest mineral soils of Fukushima Prefecture.非平衡吸附对福岛县森林矿物土壤中 Cs 垂直迁移的影响。
J Environ Radioact. 2021 Jun;232:106567. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2021.106567. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
5
Sorption-desorption characteristics of uranium, cesium and strontium in typical podzol soils from Ukraine.乌克兰典型灰化土中铀、铯和锶的吸附-解吸特性
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012 Nov;152(1-3):238-42. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncs230. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
6
Distribution of strontium-90 in soils affected by Fukushima dai-ichi nuclear power station accident in the context of cesium-137 contamination.福岛第一核电站事故影响下土壤中锶-90 的分布与铯-137 的污染情况。
Environ Pollut. 2023 Jun 1;326:121487. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121487. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
7
Desorption kinetics of cesium from Fukushima soils.铯从福岛土壤中的解吸动力学
J Environ Radioact. 2016 Mar;153:134-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.12.013. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
8
Behavior of accidentally released radiocesium in soil-water environment: Looking at Fukushima from a Chernobyl perspective.土壤-水环境中意外释放的放射性铯的行为:从切尔诺贝利视角看福岛。
J Environ Radioact. 2016 Jan;151 Pt 3:568-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.06.019. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
9
U and radiocesium in river bank soil and river sediment in Fukushima Prefecture, after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident.福岛第一核电站事故后福岛县河岸边土壤和河底沉积物中的 U 和放射性铯。
Chemosphere. 2019 Jun;225:388-394. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.03.061. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
10
Radiocesium distribution in aggregate-size fractions of cropland and forest soils affected by the Fukushima nuclear accident.福岛核事故影响下农田和森林土壤的粗颗粒级分中的放射性铯分布。
Chemosphere. 2018 Aug;205:147-155. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.092. Epub 2018 Apr 18.