Suppr超能文献

老龄化模拟研讨会与不同汇报方法对药学本科生同理心发展的影响。

Impact of an aging simulation workshop with different debrief methods on the development of empathy in pharmacy undergraduates.

机构信息

National University of Singapore, Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, Block S4A, Level 3, 18 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, Republic of Singapore.

National University of Singapore, Centre for Medical Education, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Block MD 11, #05-10, Clinical Research Centre, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore 117597, Republic of Singapore.

出版信息

Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021 Jun;13(6):683-693. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2021.01.040. Epub 2021 Feb 28.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to investigate a workshop's impact on empathy development, compare potential differences in effects among different workshop debrief methods, and identify if any demographic factors predict empathy development.

METHODS

Participants were first randomly divided to receive either a didactic lecture, a jigsaw approach, or a fishbowl approach for the debrief method. In their respective arms, participants experienced simulation stations followed by their assigned debrief. Of 167 year-two National University of Singapore pharmacy undergraduates, 130 participated in the study and completed the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Health Professions Student (JSE-HPS) version before and after the workshop.

RESULTS

The JSE-HPS scores were significantly increased post-workshop; however, no significant differences in pre-post workshop score changes were observed among the three approaches. Overall, no demographic factor was identified to have significantly influenced empathy development.

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrated that the simulation workshop developed empathy among pharmacy students regardless of the debrief method employed within the workshop. Future work would be necessary to assess if there are long-term impacts of different debrief methods on empathy development.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在探讨一个工作坊对同理心发展的影响,比较不同工作坊讨论方法的效果差异,并确定是否有任何人口统计学因素预测同理心发展。

方法

参与者首先随机分为接受专题讲座、拼图法或鱼缸法讨论方法的小组。在各自的小组中,参与者在模拟站体验后接受各自分配的讨论。在 167 名新加坡国立大学二年级药学本科生中,有 130 名参加了研究,并在工作坊前后完成了杰斐逊同理心-卫生专业学生量表(JSE-HPS)版本。

结果

工作坊后 JSE-HPS 评分显著增加;然而,三种方法之间的工作坊前后评分变化没有显著差异。总体而言,没有发现任何人口统计学因素对同理心发展有显著影响。

结论

研究表明,模拟工作坊培养了药学学生的同理心,无论工作坊中采用何种讨论方法。未来有必要评估不同讨论方法对同理心发展的长期影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验