Suppr超能文献

通过恒牙和恒牙胚进行牙齿年龄评估:葡萄牙12岁和14岁的法定年龄阈值

Dental Age Assessment by I and I: Portuguese Legal Age Thresholds of 12 and 14 Year Olds.

作者信息

Augusto Diana, Pereira Cristiana Palmela, Rodrigues Ana, Cameriere Roberto, Salvado Francisco, Santos Rui

机构信息

- Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal. Orcid Number: 0000-0003-2698-6210, Student of master's in dental medicine.

- Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal. Orcid Number: 0000 0002 9164 7189.

出版信息

Acta Stomatol Croat. 2021 Mar;55(1):45-55. doi: 10.15644/asc55/1/6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Better understanding of dental age assessment may help in cases of age estimation in Forensic Clinics. The first aim was to provide essential information on method reliability for upcoming studies using dental age assessment by second molar index (I), and third molar index (I) for age estimation on legal ages of 12 - 14 years. The second aim was to document forensic method outcomes of the Demirjian method which has already been used in forensic clinic.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two samples were used for this purpose: for I, 633 orthopantomographs (270 females / 363 males), the age range from 7 to 17 years and for I, 471 orthopantomographs (253 females / 218 males), the age range from 10 to 23 years, from the database population of Lisbon North University Hospital Center, approved by the Ethic Committee.

RESULTS

The I cut-off point (1.133) for 12- year- olds obtained better results than the cut-off point stated by the I (0.135). Besides, I cut-off point (0.001) for 14- year- olds showed better results when compared with the cut-off point (0.705) established by the I. Both methods are reliable for the legal age thresholds of 12 and 14 years. However, using I and I allows us to vary the cut-off value to privilege sensitivities or specificity, depending on which is more appropriate to the intended application.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy (88.94%) of I obtained better results for the 12- year- old cut-off point (1.133) and the accuracy (90.21%) of the I performed better for the 14- year- old cut-off point (0.001).

摘要

目的

更好地理解牙龄评估有助于法医诊所进行年龄估计。首要目的是为即将开展的研究提供有关方法可靠性的基本信息,这些研究使用第二磨牙指数(I)和第三磨牙指数(I)来估计12至14岁法定年龄的年龄。第二个目的是记录已在法医诊所使用的德米尔jian方法的法医方法结果。

材料与方法

为此使用了两个样本:对于I,633张口腔全景片(女性270例/男性363例),年龄范围为7至17岁;对于I,471张口腔全景片(女性253例/男性218例),年龄范围为10至23岁,来自里斯本北部大学医院中心的数据库人群,经伦理委员会批准。

结果

12岁儿童的I截断点(1.133)比I规定的截断点(0.135)取得了更好的结果。此外,14岁儿童的I截断点(0.001)与I确定的截断点(0.705)相比显示出更好的结果。两种方法对于12岁和14岁的法定年龄阈值都是可靠的。然而,使用I和I使我们能够根据预期应用中更合适的情况来改变截断值以优先考虑敏感性或特异性。

结论

I的准确性(88.94%)在12岁截断点(1.133)取得了更好的结果,I的准确性(90.21%)在14岁截断点(0.001)表现更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0ac/8033628/bcc8e1e5e662/ASC_55(1)_45-55-f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验