Churchill Nathan W, Hutchison Michael G, Graham Simon J, Schweizer Tom A
Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Neuroscience Research Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Front Physiol. 2021 Mar 30;12:653603. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.653603. eCollection 2021.
High-performance university athletes experience frequent exertion, resulting in disrupted biological homeostasis, but it is unclear to what extent brain physiology is affected. We examined whether athletes without overtraining symptoms show signs of increased neurophysiological stress over the course of a single athletic season, and whether the effects are modified by demographic factors of age, sex and concussion history, and sport-related factors of contact exposure and season length. Fifty-three university-level athletes were recruited from multiple sports at a single institution and followed longitudinally from beginning of season (BOS) to end of season (EOS) and 1 month afterwards, with a subset followed up at the subsequent beginning of season. MRI was used to comprehensively assess white matter (WM) diffusivity, cerebral blood flow (CBF), and brain activity, while overtraining symptoms were assessed with Hooper's Index (HI). Although athletes did not report increased HI scores, they showed significantly increased white matter diffusivity and decreased CBF at EOS and 1 month afterwards, with recovery at follow-up. Global brain activity was not significantly altered though, highlighting the ability of the brain to adapt to exercise-related stressors. Male athletes had greater white matter diffusivity at EOS, but female athletes had greater declines in CBF at 1 month afterwards. Post-season changes in MRI measures were not related to change in HI score, age, concussion history, contact exposure, or length of athletic season. Hence, the brain shows substantial but reversible neurophysiological changes due to season play in the absence of overtraining symptoms, with effects that are sex-dependent but otherwise insensitive to demographic variations. These findings provide new insights into the effects of training and competitive play on brain health.
高水平大学运动员经常进行高强度运动,导致生物体内稳态被打乱,但大脑生理受影响的程度尚不清楚。我们研究了没有过度训练症状的运动员在单个运动赛季过程中是否表现出神经生理应激增加的迹象,以及这些影响是否会因年龄、性别和脑震荡史等人口统计学因素以及接触性运动暴露和赛季时长等与运动相关的因素而有所改变。从一所机构的多个运动项目中招募了53名大学水平的运动员,从赛季开始(BOS)到赛季结束(EOS)以及之后1个月进行纵向跟踪,其中一部分运动员在随后的赛季开始时进行了随访。使用磁共振成像(MRI)全面评估白质(WM)扩散率、脑血流量(CBF)和脑活动,同时用胡珀指数(HI)评估过度训练症状。尽管运动员报告的HI分数没有增加,但他们在EOS时以及之后1个月显示出白质扩散率显著增加,CBF降低,随访时恢复。不过,全脑活动没有显著改变,这突出了大脑适应与运动相关应激源的能力。男性运动员在EOS时白质扩散率更高,但女性运动员在之后1个月CBF下降幅度更大。MRI测量的赛季后变化与HI分数、年龄、脑震荡史、接触性运动暴露或运动赛季时长的变化无关。因此,在没有过度训练症状时,大脑因赛季比赛而出现显著但可逆的神经生理变化,其影响存在性别差异,但对人口统计学差异不敏感。这些发现为训练和竞技比赛对大脑健康的影响提供了新的见解。