Suppr超能文献

阈下或已确诊边缘型人格障碍患者的人格功能与心理化:对《国际疾病分类第11版》的启示

Personality Functioning and Mentalizing in Patients With Subthreshold or Diagnosed Borderline Personality Disorder: Implications for ICD-11.

作者信息

Rishede Marie Zerafine, Juul Sophie, Bo Sune, Gondan Matthias, Bjerrum Møeller Stine, Simonsen Sebastian

机构信息

Stolpegaard Psychotherapy Centre, Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark, Gentofte, Denmark.

Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 31;12:634332. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.634332. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

The 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics (ICD-11) defines personality disorder according to personality functioning, which relates to self- and interpersonal functioning. The aim of the present study was to assess the relationship between mentalizing and personality functioning in patients with subthreshold or diagnosed borderline personality disorder. A total of 116 eligible participants were included. Mentalizing was assessed using the Mentalization Questionnaire (MZQ), personality functioning (self- and interpersonal functioning) was assessed using the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF), and borderline severity was assessed using the Zanarini Rating Scale (ZAN-BPD). Mediation analysis was employed to test if mentalizing accounted for the relationship between borderline severity and self- and interpersonal functioning. We found a significant relationship between borderline severity and both subscales of the LPFS-BF. Mentalizing fully and significantly mediated the relationship between borderline severity and interpersonal functioning. However, mentalizing only partly mediated the relationship between borderline severity and self-functioning. Controlling for the covariates gender and age did not impact the results. Mentalizing is likely to be involved in the ICD-11 model of personality functioning, especially interpersonal functioning. This could emphasize the relevance of therapy aimed at strengthening mentalizing abilities when treating personality pathology in general and people with borderline personality disorder in particular. However, self-functioning may be more nuanced, as aspects other than mentalizing also influence self-functioning. The study is explorative in nature and has methodological limitations that require caution in the interpretation and generalizability.

摘要

《国际疾病分类第十一次修订本:死亡率和发病率统计》(ICD - 11)根据人格功能来定义人格障碍,人格功能与自我功能和人际功能相关。本研究的目的是评估阈下或已确诊边缘型人格障碍患者的心理化与人格功能之间的关系。总共纳入了116名符合条件的参与者。使用心理化问卷(MZQ)评估心理化,使用人格功能水平量表简版2.0(LPFS - BF)评估人格功能(自我功能和人际功能),使用扎纳里尼评定量表(ZAN - BPD)评估边缘型人格障碍的严重程度。采用中介分析来检验心理化是否解释了边缘型人格障碍严重程度与自我功能和人际功能之间的关系。我们发现边缘型人格障碍严重程度与LPFS - BF的两个分量表之间存在显著关系。心理化完全且显著地中介了边缘型人格障碍严重程度与人际功能之间的关系。然而,心理化仅部分中介了边缘型人格障碍严重程度与自我功能之间的关系。控制协变量性别和年龄并未影响结果。心理化可能参与了ICD - 11人格功能模型,尤其是人际功能。这可能强调了在治疗一般人格病理学尤其是边缘型人格障碍患者时,旨在增强心理化能力的治疗的相关性。然而,自我功能可能更为微妙,因为除心理化之外的其他方面也会影响自我功能。本研究本质上是探索性的,存在方法学上的局限性,在解释和推广时需谨慎。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a5f/8044580/dd4fb85c5858/fpsyt-12-634332-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验