Centre for Psychiatry, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom; email:
Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand; email:
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019 May 7;15:481-502. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095736. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
The nomenclature of personality disorders in the 11th revision of the represents the most radical change in the classification history of personality disorders. A dimensional structure now replaces categorical description. It was argued by the Working Group that only a dimensional system was consistent with the empirical evidence and, in the spirit of clinical utility, the new system is based on two steps. The first step is to assign one of five levels of severity, and the second step is to assign up to five prominent domain traits. There was resistance to this structure from those who feel that categorical diagnosis, particularly of borderline personality disorder, should be retained. After lengthy discussion, described in detail here, there is now an option for a borderline pattern descriptor to be selected as a diagnostic option after severity has been determined.
在《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第十一版中,人格障碍的命名代表了人格障碍分类历史上最激进的变化。现在采用的是维度结构,而不是分类描述。工作组认为,只有维度系统才符合实证证据,而且为了临床实用性,新系统基于两个步骤。第一步是确定严重程度的五个等级之一,第二步是确定五个突出的领域特征。这种结构遭到了一些人的反对,他们认为应该保留分类诊断,特别是边缘型人格障碍的分类诊断。经过详细描述的长时间讨论,现在在确定严重程度后,可以选择边缘型模式描述符作为诊断选择。