• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

序贯器官衰竭评估评分联合C反应蛋白在复杂性感染性心内膜炎患者中的准确性及预后价值

Accuracy and Prognosis Value of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score Combined With C-Reactive Protein in Patients With Complicated Infective Endocarditis.

作者信息

Lin Yaowang, Dong Shaohong, Yuan Jie, Yu Danqing, Bei Weijie, Chen Ruimian, Qin Haiyan

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Shenzhen Cardiovascular Minimally Invasive Medical Engineering Technology Research and Development Center, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, China.

Department of Cardiology, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 25;8:576970. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.576970. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2021.576970
PMID:33869237
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8044865/
Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and prognostic value of the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score combined with C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients with complicated infective endocarditis (IE). A total of 246 consecutive patients with complicated IE were included in the multicentric prospective observational study. These patients were divided into four groups depending on the SOFA score and CRP optimal cutoff values (≥5 points and ≥17.6 mg/L, respectively), which were determined using the receiver operating characteristic analysis: low SOFA and low CRP ( = 83), low SOFA and high CRP ( = 87), high SOFA and low CRP ( = 25), and high SOFA and high CRP ( = 51). The primary endpoint was in-hospital death, and the secondary endpoint was long-time mortality, defined as subsequent readmission and 3-years mortality in the follow-up period. High SOFA score and high CRP were associated with approximately 29.410% (15/51) of higher incidence of in-hospital death with an area under the curve of 0.872. Multivariate analyses showed that age [odds ratio (OR) = 2.242, 1.142-4.401], neurological failure (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 12) (OR = 2.513, 1.041-4.224), (OR = 2.151, 1.252-4.513), SOFA ≥ 5 (OR = 9.320, 3.621-16.847), and surgical treatment (OR = 0.121, 0.031-0.342) were clinical predictors for in-hospital death. On following up for 12-36 months, SOFA ≥ 5 ( = 0.000) showed higher mortality. A high SOFA score combined with increased CRP levels is associated with in-hospital mortality. Also, SOFA score, but not CRP, predicts long-term mortality in complicated IE.

摘要

本研究旨在评估序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分联合C反应蛋白(CRP)对复杂性感染性心内膜炎(IE)患者的准确性及预后价值。多中心前瞻性观察性研究纳入了246例连续性复杂性IE患者。根据使用受试者工作特征分析确定的SOFA评分及CRP最佳截断值(分别为≥5分和≥17.6mg/L),将这些患者分为四组:低SOFA且低CRP组(n = 83)、低SOFA且高CRP组(n = 87)、高SOFA且低CRP组(n = 25)、高SOFA且高CRP组(n = 51)。主要终点为住院死亡,次要终点为长期死亡率,定义为随访期内再次入院及3年死亡率。高SOFA评分和高CRP与约29.410%(15/51)的较高住院死亡率相关,曲线下面积为0.872。多因素分析显示,年龄[比值比(OR)= 2.242,1.142 - 4.401]、神经功能衰竭(格拉斯哥昏迷量表≤12)(OR = 2.513,1.041 - 4.224)、[此处原文缺失部分内容](OR = 2.151,1.252 - 4.513)、SOFA≥5(OR = 9.320,3.621 - 16.847)及手术治疗(OR = 0.121,0.031 - 0.342)是住院死亡的临床预测因素。随访12 - 36个月时,SOFA≥5(P = 0.000)显示死亡率更高。高SOFA评分联合CRP水平升高与住院死亡率相关。此外,SOFA评分而非CRP可预测复杂性IE的长期死亡率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb76/8044865/6308ffa6ac29/fmed-08-576970-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb76/8044865/ce97e950b72a/fmed-08-576970-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb76/8044865/51e03220cbcb/fmed-08-576970-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb76/8044865/6308ffa6ac29/fmed-08-576970-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb76/8044865/ce97e950b72a/fmed-08-576970-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb76/8044865/51e03220cbcb/fmed-08-576970-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb76/8044865/6308ffa6ac29/fmed-08-576970-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Accuracy and Prognosis Value of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score Combined With C-Reactive Protein in Patients With Complicated Infective Endocarditis.序贯器官衰竭评估评分联合C反应蛋白在复杂性感染性心内膜炎患者中的准确性及预后价值
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 25;8:576970. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.576970. eCollection 2021.
2
[Prognostic value of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein combined with sequential organ failure assessment score in elderly patients with sepsis induced by pulmonary infection].降钙素原与C反应蛋白联合序贯器官衰竭评估评分在老年肺部感染所致脓毒症患者中的预后价值
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 May;31(5):562-565. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.05.008.
3
Validity of SOFA score as a prognostic tool for critically ill elderly patients with acute infective endocarditis.SOFA 评分作为危重症老年急性感染性心内膜炎患者预后工具的有效性。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Sep 24;22(3):967-973. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2203105.
4
[Combined prognostic value of serum lactic acid, procalcitonin and severity score for short-term prognosis of septic shock patients].[血清乳酸、降钙素原及严重程度评分对脓毒症休克患者短期预后的联合预测价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Mar;33(3):281-285. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20201113-00715.
5
[The correlation between procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and severity scores in patients with sepsis and their value in assessment of prognosis].[脓毒症患者降钙素原、C反应蛋白与病情严重程度评分的相关性及其对预后评估的价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 Feb;27(2):97-101. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2015.02.004.
6
The SOFA score could predict the severity and prognosis of infective endocarditis.SOFA 评分可预测感染性心内膜炎的严重程度和预后。
J Infect Chemother. 2019 Dec;25(12):965-971. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2019.05.014. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
7
C-Reactive Protein at Hospital Discharge and 1-Year Mortality in Acute Infective Endocarditis: A Prospective Observational Study.急性感染性心内膜炎患者出院时的C反应蛋白与1年死亡率:一项前瞻性观察研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Aug 9;8:706684. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.706684. eCollection 2021.
8
Long-term outcomes and cardiac surgery in critically ill patients with infective endocarditis.危重症感染性心内膜炎患者的长期预后和心脏手术治疗。
Eur Heart J. 2014 May;35(18):1195-204. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht303. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
9
[Prognostic value of Charlson weighted index of comorbidities combined with sequential organ failure assessment score and procalcitonin in patients with sepsis].[脓毒症患者中Charlson合并症加权指数联合序贯器官衰竭评估评分及降钙素原的预后价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Nov;31(11):1335-1339. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.11.005.
10
[Combined predictive value of the risk factors influencing the short-term prognosis of sepsis].[影响脓毒症短期预后的危险因素的联合预测价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Mar;32(3):307-312. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200306-00218.

引用本文的文献

1
Combining C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and serum albumin to predict long-term mortality in patients with infective endocarditis.将 C 反应蛋白、降钙素原和血清白蛋白相结合,预测感染性心内膜炎患者的长期死亡率。
J Int Med Res. 2023 Oct;51(10):3000605231208910. doi: 10.1177/03000605231208910.
2
Intraoperative Cell Savage, Infection and Organ Failure in Infective Endocarditis Patients-A Retrospective Single Center Evaluation.感染性心内膜炎患者术中细胞回收、感染与器官衰竭——一项回顾性单中心评估
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 3;12(1):382. doi: 10.3390/jcm12010382.
3
Risk Factors Associated with Poor Outcome in Patients with Infective Endocarditis: An Italian Single-Center Experience.

本文引用的文献

1
The SOFA score could predict the severity and prognosis of infective endocarditis.SOFA 评分可预测感染性心内膜炎的严重程度和预后。
J Infect Chemother. 2019 Dec;25(12):965-971. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2019.05.014. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
2
Impact of antimicrobial treatment duration on outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a cohort study.抗菌治疗时间对金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症结局的影响:一项队列研究。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Jun;25(6):723-732. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
3
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.
感染性心内膜炎患者预后不良的相关危险因素:一项意大利单中心经验
Infect Dis Rep. 2022 Mar 21;14(2):213-219. doi: 10.3390/idr14020026.
SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对 ICU 收治的疑似感染成人院内死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
4
Long-Term Results of Early Surgery versus Conventional Treatment for Infective Endocarditis Trial.感染性心内膜炎早期手术与传统治疗的长期结果试验
Korean Circ J. 2016 Nov;46(6):846-850. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2016.46.6.846. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
5
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).脓毒症临床标准评估:针对《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义》(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
6
2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: The Task Force for the Management of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM).2015年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)感染性心内膜炎管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)感染性心内膜炎管理工作组。认可机构:欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)、欧洲核医学协会(EANM)。
Eur Heart J. 2015 Nov 21;36(44):3075-3128. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv319. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
7
A nationwide cohort study of mortality risk and long-term prognosis in infective endocarditis in Sweden.一项全国性队列研究:瑞典感染性心内膜炎的死亡率风险与长期预后。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 8;8(7):e67519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067519. Print 2013.
8
Impact of a multidisciplinary management strategy on the outcome of patients with native valve infective endocarditis.多学科管理策略对原发性心脏瓣膜感染性心内膜炎患者结局的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 15;112(8):1171-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.05.060. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
9
Surgical treatment for infective endocarditis and hospital mortality in a Brazilian single-center.巴西单中心感染性心内膜炎的外科治疗与医院死亡率
Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2013 Mar;28(1):29-35. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20130006.
10
Infective endocarditis with symptomatic cerebral complications: contribution of cerebral magnetic resonance imaging.感染性心内膜炎合并有症状的脑部并发症:脑部磁共振成像的作用。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;35(4):327-36. doi: 10.1159/000348317. Epub 2013 Apr 23.