Mitchell Helena Ann
The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom.
Front Sociol. 2020 Apr 9;5:23. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.00023. eCollection 2020.
This article explores the opportunities for strengthening participatory action research (PAR) through an intersectionality framework. In 2015, I completed a Ph.D. study into the lived experiences of migrant Guyanese women, living in England, when seeking diagnoses and treatment for Type 2 diabetes. Group storytelling acted as a lens for the women to talk about how they tried to obtain a diagnosis, in addition to their migratory experiences. Both PAR and intersectionality encourage participant collaboration and community engagement of oppressed groups. The article concludes that the PAR study would have been enhanced by overlaying it with an intersectionality framework. The argument is presented that by doing so the women's accounts in the research study would have been privileged more and activism encouraged in bringing about change to current practices and avoiding perpetuating existing oppressions. The Ph.D. study methodology was based on Koch's interpretation of PAR. In this, PAR is used where the focus is on participation of all stakeholders toward reform and change. It is seen as a social, practical and collaborative process where building relationships with participants is crucial. Intersectionality acknowledges the potential for "black" and other women of color to not remain on the margins but to challenge the traditional biomedical model of health care delivery. Implementing an intersectional approach to the data generation and analysis would have acknowledged power dynamics (i.e., privilege and oppression) and help to identify potential gaps in diabetic provision which are currently invisible or inequitable due to interventions designed to meet the needs of a homogeneous White middle class society.
本文探讨了通过交叉性框架加强参与式行动研究(PAR)的机会。2015年,我完成了一项关于居住在英国的圭亚那移民女性在寻求2型糖尿病诊断和治疗时的生活经历的博士研究。群体叙事成为这些女性谈论她们如何试图获得诊断以及她们的移民经历的一个视角。参与式行动研究和交叉性都鼓励参与者合作以及受压迫群体的社区参与。文章得出结论,通过将交叉性框架叠加到参与式行动研究上,该研究会得到加强。有人认为,这样做会使研究中女性的叙述更受重视,并鼓励积极行动以改变当前的做法,避免延续现有的压迫。该博士研究方法基于科赫对参与式行动研究的解读。在这种解读中,参与式行动研究用于关注所有利益相关者对改革和变革的参与。它被视为一个社会、实践和协作的过程,与参与者建立关系至关重要。交叉性承认“黑人”和其他有色人种女性有可能不处于边缘地位,而是挑战传统的生物医学医疗保健模式。对数据生成和分析采用交叉性方法将承认权力动态(即特权和压迫),并有助于识别糖尿病医疗服务中目前由于旨在满足同质化白人中产阶级社会需求的干预措施而不可见或不公平的潜在差距。