• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移民与本地居民的居住隔离和社会信任:来自荷兰的证据

Residential Segregation and Social Trust of Immigrants and Natives: Evidence From the Netherlands.

作者信息

Ziller Conrad, Spörlein Christoph

机构信息

Institute of Sociology and Social Psychology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Institute of Social Sciences, Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Front Sociol. 2020 Jul 7;5:45. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.00045. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2020.00045
PMID:33869452
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8022758/
Abstract

This study examines the relationship between residential segregation and social trust of immigrants and natives in the Netherlands. Building on previous studies that have found evidence for a negative segregation-trust link, we present a nuanced narrative by (i) distinguishing between an ethnic minority and majority perspective, (ii) elaborating theoretical foundations on the moderating role of individual exposure in the form of ethnic minority concentration in the neighborhood, and (iii) taking income segregation into account. In addition to the refined theoretical framework, our study employs a rigorous empirical approach. Using two waves (2009 and 2013) of the Netherlands Longitudinal Lifecourse Study-a geocoded panel study with an oversampling of Moroccan and Turkish immigrants-we are able to study the influence of (changes in) municipality-level segregation patterns for both natives and immigrants, and consider the roles of both neighborhood ethnic minority concentration, as well as income-based segregation. Results from four-level multilevel models show that ethnic segregation is negatively related to the social trust of immigrants. At the same time, this negative relationship is particularly strong in neighborhoods with a low level of minority population concentration, which provides support for the so-called integration paradox where negative intergroup interactions reduce social trust. For respondents of Dutch origin, we find no evidence that their social trust is sensitive to ethnic segregation or that this relationship is conditional on minority concentration at the neighborhood level.

摘要

本研究考察了荷兰居民隔离与移民及本地人的社会信任之间的关系。基于以往发现隔离与信任之间存在负相关证据的研究,我们通过以下方式呈现了一个细致入微的叙述:(i)区分少数族裔和多数族裔的视角;(ii)阐述关于以邻里中少数族裔集中形式存在的个体接触的调节作用的理论基础;(iii)将收入隔离考虑在内。除了完善的理论框架,我们的研究还采用了严谨的实证方法。利用荷兰纵向生命历程研究的两期数据(2009年和2013年)——这是一项进行了地理编码的面板研究,对摩洛哥和土耳其移民进行了过度抽样——我们能够研究市级层面的隔离模式(及其变化)对本地人和移民的影响,并考虑邻里中少数族裔集中以及基于收入的隔离所起的作用。四级多层次模型的结果表明,族裔隔离与移民的社会信任呈负相关。与此同时,这种负相关在少数族裔人口集中度较低的社区尤为强烈,这为所谓的融合悖论提供了支持,即负面的群体间互动会降低社会信任。对于荷兰裔受访者,我们没有发现证据表明他们的社会信任对族裔隔离敏感,或者这种关系取决于邻里层面的少数族裔集中程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbb2/8022758/e21396d2a433/fsoc-05-00045-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbb2/8022758/a69c41d00bfa/fsoc-05-00045-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbb2/8022758/e21396d2a433/fsoc-05-00045-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbb2/8022758/a69c41d00bfa/fsoc-05-00045-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbb2/8022758/e21396d2a433/fsoc-05-00045-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Residential Segregation and Social Trust of Immigrants and Natives: Evidence From the Netherlands.移民与本地居民的居住隔离和社会信任:来自荷兰的证据
Front Sociol. 2020 Jul 7;5:45. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.00045. eCollection 2020.
2
Ethnic concentration in the neighbourhood and majority and minority language: A study of first and second-generation immigrants.族群聚居与主要语言和少数语言:第一代和第二代移民研究。
Soc Sci Res. 2012 May;41(3):555-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
3
Trust is in the eye of the beholder: How perceptions of local diversity and segregation shape social cohesion.信任因人而异:对当地多样性和隔离的认知如何塑造社会凝聚力。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 16;13:1036646. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1036646. eCollection 2022.
4
Moving for Diversity or Moving for the Kids? The Micro-Dynamics of Residential Relocations During Family Formation of Immigrants and Natives.为了多样性而搬家还是为了孩子而搬家?移民和本地居民组建家庭期间住宅搬迁的微观动态
Front Sociol. 2020 Oct 26;5:538946. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.538946. eCollection 2020.
5
Neighborhood ethnic density and suicide risk among different migrant groups in the four big cities in the Netherlands.荷兰四大城市中不同移民群体的邻里种族密度与自杀风险
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;50(6):951-62. doi: 10.1007/s00127-014-0993-y. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
6
Local ties that bind: The role of perceived neighborhood cohesion and disorder for immigrants' national identification.地方联系:邻里凝聚力和混乱对移民国家认同的影响。
Soc Sci Res. 2023 May;112:102803. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102803. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
7
Residential Segregation and Depressive Symptoms in Older Chinese Immigrants: The Mediating Role of Social Processes.居住隔离与老年中国移民的抑郁症状:社会过程的中介作用。
Gerontologist. 2023 Sep 2;63(8):1376-1384. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnad027.
8
Neighborhood ethnic diversity and trust: the role of intergroup contact and perceived threat.邻里民族多样性与信任:群体间接触和感知威胁的作用。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Mar;25(3):665-74. doi: 10.1177/0956797613508956. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
9
Ethnic diversity, poverty and social trust in Germany: Evidence from a behavioral measure of trust.德国的民族多样性、贫困和社会信任:来自信任行为衡量的证据。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 18;13(7):e0199834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199834. eCollection 2018.
10
Factors shaping workplace segregation between natives and immigrants.影响本土居民与移民之间职场隔离的因素。
Demography. 2014 Apr;51(2):645-71. doi: 10.1007/s13524-013-0271-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Demographic factors, partial social belonging and psychological resources associated with coping.人口统计学因素、部分社会归属感以及与应对相关的心理资源。
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 3;14:1154659. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1154659. eCollection 2023.
2
Is There a Rural Penalty in Language Acquisition? Evidence From Germany's Refugee Allocation Policy.语言习得中存在农村劣势吗?来自德国难民分配政策的证据。
Front Sociol. 2022 Jun 2;7:841775. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.841775. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Economic conditions and native-immigrant asymmetries in generalized social trust.经济条件与广义社会信任中的本土-移民不对称性。
Soc Sci Res. 2020 Mar;87:102399. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.102399. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
2
Immigration, social trust, and the moderating role of value contexts.移民、社会信任与价值语境的调节作用。
Soc Sci Res. 2019 Mar;79:115-126. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.12.009. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
3
Contested Boundaries: Explaining Where Ethnoracial Diversity Provokes Neighborhood Conflict.有争议的边界:解释为何族裔多样性会引发邻里冲突。
AJS. 2016 Jul;122(1):125-161. doi: 10.1086/686942.
4
Social norm enforcement in ethnically diverse communities.族群多元化社区的社会规范执行。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2722-2727. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1718309115. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
5
Wider-community Segregation and the Effect of Neighbourhood Ethnic Diversity on Social Capital: An Investigation into Intra-Neighbourhood Trust in Great Britain and London.更广泛社区的隔离以及邻里种族多样性对社会资本的影响:对英国和伦敦邻里内部信任的调查。
Sociology. 2017 Oct;51(5):1011-1033. doi: 10.1177/0038038516641867. Epub 2016 May 10.
6
Losing Wallets, Retaining Trust? The Relationship Between Ethnic Heterogeneity and Trusting Coethnic and Non-coethnic Neighbours and Non-neighbours to Return a Lost Wallet.丢失钱包,仍能保持信任?种族异质性与信任同种族和不同种族邻居及非邻居归还丢失钱包之间的关系。
Soc Indic Res. 2017;131(2):631-658. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1264-y. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
7
The Integration Paradox: Empiric Evidence From the Netherlands.整合悖论:来自荷兰的实证证据
Am Behav Sci. 2016 May;60(5-6):583-596. doi: 10.1177/0002764216632838. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
8
Love Thy Neighbor? Ethnoracial Diversity and Trust Reexamined.爱你的邻居?对种族多样性与信任的重新审视。
AJS. 2015 Nov;121(3):722-82. doi: 10.1086/683144.
9
Can competing diversity indices inform us about why ethnic diversity erodes social cohesion? A test of five diversity indices in Germany.竞争多样性指数能否告诉我们为什么种族多样性会破坏社会凝聚力?对德国五种多样性指数的检验。
Soc Sci Res. 2013 May;42(3):755-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.12.018. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
10
The contact caveat: negative contact predicts increased prejudice more than positive contact predicts reduced prejudice.接触警示:负面接触比正面接触更能预测增加偏见。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Dec;38(12):1629-43. doi: 10.1177/0146167212457953. Epub 2012 Aug 31.