Littlefield Philip D, Richter Claus-Peter
Department of Otolaryngology Sharp Rees-Stealy Medical Group San Diego California USA.
Department of Otolaryngology Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2021 Mar 12;6(2):310-319. doi: 10.1002/lio2.541. eCollection 2021 Apr.
We provide an appraisal of recent research on stimulation of the auditory system with light. In particular, we discuss direct infrared stimulation and ongoing controversies regarding the feasibility of this modality. We also discuss advancements and barriers to the development of an optical cochlear implant.
This is a review article that covers relevant animal studies.
The auditory system has been stimulated with infrared light, and in a much more spatially selective manner than with electrical stimulation. However, there are experiments from other labs that have not been able to reproduce these results. This has resulted in an ongoing controversy regarding the feasibility of infrared stimulation, and the reasons for these experimental differences still require explanation. The neural response characteristics also appear to be much different than with electrical stimulation. The electrical stimulation paradigms used for modern cochlear implants do not apply well to optical stimulation and new coding strategies are under development. Stimulation with infrared light brings the risk of heat accumulation in the tissue at high pulse repetition rates, so optimal pulse shapes and combined optical/electrical stimulation are being investigated to mitigate this. Optogenetics is another promising technique, which makes neurons more sensitive to light stimulation by inserting light sensitive ion channels via viral vectors. Challenges of optogenetics include the expression of light sensitive channels in sufficient density in the target neurons, and the risk of damaging neurons by the expression of a foreign protein.
Optical stimulation of the nervous system is a promising new field, and there has been progress toward the development of a cochlear implant that takes advantage of the benefits of optical stimulation. There are barriers, and controversies, but so far none that seem intractable.
NA (animal studies and basic research).
我们对近期关于光刺激听觉系统的研究进行评估。特别是,我们讨论直接红外刺激以及关于这种方式可行性的持续争议。我们还讨论了光学人工耳蜗开发的进展和障碍。
这是一篇涵盖相关动物研究的综述文章。
已经用红外光刺激了听觉系统,并且其空间选择性比电刺激要强得多。然而,其他实验室的实验未能重现这些结果。这导致了关于红外刺激可行性的持续争议,这些实验差异的原因仍有待解释。神经反应特征似乎也与电刺激有很大不同。现代人工耳蜗所使用的电刺激模式不太适用于光刺激,新的编码策略正在开发中。在高脉冲重复率下,红外光刺激会带来组织中热量积累的风险,因此正在研究最佳脉冲形状以及光/电联合刺激以减轻这种情况。光遗传学是另一种有前景的技术,它通过病毒载体插入光敏离子通道使神经元对光刺激更敏感。光遗传学的挑战包括在目标神经元中以足够的密度表达光敏通道,以及因表达外源蛋白而损害神经元的风险。
神经系统的光刺激是一个有前景的新领域,在开发利用光刺激优势的人工耳蜗方面已经取得了进展。存在障碍和争议,但迄今为止似乎没有一个是难以解决的。
不适用(动物研究和基础研究)