School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia; Agriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Armidale, New South Wales 2350, Australia; Department of Livestock Services, Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock, Dhaka 1215, Bangladesh.
Agriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Armidale, New South Wales 2350, Australia.
Poult Sci. 2021 Jun;100(6):101063. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101063. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
Sunlight intensity and UV radiation may affect free-range hens' use of the outside range, particularly when sunlight is intense with a high UV index. However, it is uncertain what aspect of sunlight (brightness or UV) may be most aversive to hens to discourage them from leaving standard indoor lighting conditions to venture outdoors. A controlled indoor-based choice study was conducted to determine whether hens showed preferences for different light wavelengths and intensities that may affect outdoor range usage. Cage-reared ISA Brown laying hens (n = 84) at 44 wk of age in 3 groups (28 hens/group) were tested for preferences of indoor standard light emitting diode (LED) white light (control) vs. one of three different treatment lights: 1) visible spectrum plus infrared wavelengths (VIS); 2) visible spectrum plus UVA wavelengths (UVA); and (iii) visible spectrum plus UVA and UVB wavelengths (UVA/B) presented successively at low, medium, or high levels of intensity. Hens within each group were individually tested for 2 h in an apparatus with 2 compartments (control vs. treatment) connected by a tunnel on both sides. Videos of hens' time spent in each compartment and behaviors were decoded and analyzed using GLMM. Hens spent more time under the low intensity of the UVA/B light treatment (62%), the low intensity of VIS light (61%), medium intensities of both UVA/B light (60%), and UVA light (59%), and the high intensity of the VIS light (58%) when compared with control light (all P ≤ 0.05). Hens spent less time feeding under all intensities of UVA light (all P ≤ 0.03) and showed more foraging, ground pecking, and preening at lower levels of UVA/B light (P < 0.05). The study suggests that UVA/B light (sunlight) may have positive effects for hen range use, but during peak sun intensities, hens may need additional measures (e.g., shelter) to protect themselves. Confirmation of these findings in a free-range setting is needed.
阳光强度和紫外线辐射可能会影响自由放养母鸡对室外活动区域的使用,尤其是当阳光强烈且紫外线指数较高时。然而,目前尚不确定阳光的哪个方面(亮度还是紫外线)对母鸡最具威慑力,从而阻止它们离开标准的室内光照条件去冒险到室外。进行了一项基于室内的控制选择研究,以确定母鸡是否表现出对不同波长和强度的光的偏好,这些光可能会影响它们对室外活动区域的使用。在 3 组(每组 28 只母鸡)中测试了 44 周龄 ISA 棕色产蛋母鸡(n=84)对室内标准发光二极管(LED)白光(对照)与 3 种不同处理光的偏好:1)可见光谱加红外线波长(VIS);2)可见光谱加 UVA 波长(UVA);和 3)可见光谱加 UVA 和 UVB 波长(UVA/B),以低、中、高强度依次呈现。每组中的母鸡在一个带有 2 个隔间的装置中单独测试 2 小时,两边通过隧道连接。使用 GLMM 对母鸡在每个隔间的停留时间和行为进行解码和分析。与对照光相比,母鸡在 UVA/B 光处理的低强度(62%)、VIS 光的低强度(61%)、UVA/B 光的中强度(60%)和 UVA 光的中强度(59%)以及 VIS 光的高强度(58%)下停留的时间更多(所有 P≤0.05)。在所有 UVA 光强度下,母鸡的进食时间都减少(所有 P≤0.03),并且在 UVA/B 光较低水平下,母鸡表现出更多的觅食、地面啄食和理羽行为(P<0.05)。该研究表明,UVA/B 光(阳光)可能对母鸡的活动范围使用有积极影响,但在阳光强度峰值时,母鸡可能需要额外的措施(例如遮蔽物)来保护自己。需要在自由放养环境中证实这些发现。