• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

词义作为意义调制的聚类:一词多义的计算模型。

Word Senses as Clusters of Meaning Modulations: A Computational Model of Polysemy.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough.

Department of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario.

出版信息

Cogn Sci. 2021 Apr;45(4):e12955. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12955.

DOI:10.1111/cogs.12955
PMID:33873247
Abstract

Most words in natural languages are polysemous; that is, they have related but different meanings in different contexts. This one-to-many mapping of form to meaning presents a challenge to understanding how word meanings are learned, represented, and processed. Previous work has focused on solutions in which multiple static semantic representations are linked to a single word form, which fails to capture important generalizations about how polysemous words are used; in particular, the graded nature of polysemous senses, and the flexibility and regularity of polysemy use. We provide a novel view of how polysemous words are represented and processed, focusing on how meaning is modulated by context. Our theory is implemented within a recurrent neural network that learns distributional information through exposure to a large and representative corpus of English. Clusters of meaning emerge from how the model processes individual word forms. In keeping with distributional theories of semantics, we suggest word meanings are generalized from contexts of different word tokens, with polysemy emerging as multiple clusters of contextually modulated meanings. We validate our results against a human-annotated corpus of polysemy focusing on the gradedness, flexibility, and regularity of polysemous sense individuation, as well as behavioral findings of offline sense relatedness ratings and online sentence processing. The results provide novel insights into how polysemy emerges from contextual processing of word meaning from both a theoretical and computational point of view.

摘要

大多数自然语言中的单词都是多义词;也就是说,它们在不同的上下文中具有相关但不同的含义。这种从形式到意义的一一映射给理解单词含义的学习、表示和处理方式带来了挑战。之前的工作主要集中在将多个静态语义表示与单个单词形式相关联的解决方案上,而这种方法未能捕捉到关于多义词如何使用的重要概括;特别是多义词意义的渐进性,以及多义词使用的灵活性和规律性。我们提供了一种新的视角来表示和处理多义词,重点关注上下文如何调节意义。我们的理论是在一个通过接触大量具有代表性的英语语料库来学习分布信息的递归神经网络中实现的。从模型处理单个单词形式的方式中涌现出了意义的集群。与语义的分布理论一致,我们认为单词的含义是从不同单词标记的上下文泛化而来的,多义性是作为多个语境调节意义的集群出现的。我们针对多义性的人类注释语料库验证了我们的结果,重点关注多义性意义个体化的渐进性、灵活性和规律性,以及离线意义相关性评分和在线句子处理的行为发现。结果从理论和计算的角度为我们提供了关于多义性如何从语境处理单词意义中产生的新见解。

相似文献

1
Word Senses as Clusters of Meaning Modulations: A Computational Model of Polysemy.词义作为意义调制的聚类:一词多义的计算模型。
Cogn Sci. 2021 Apr;45(4):e12955. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12955.
2
Probing Lexical Ambiguity: Word Vectors Encode Number and Relatedness of Senses.探究词汇歧义:词向量编码词义的数量和关联性。
Cogn Sci. 2021 May;45(5):e12943. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12943.
3
Opposing effects of semantic diversity in lexical and semantic relatedness decisions.词汇和语义相关性判断中语义多样性的相反作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Apr;41(2):385-402. doi: 10.1037/a0038995. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
4
Polysemy and the subjective lexicon: semantic relatedness and the salience of intraword senses.一词多义与主观词汇:语义相关性及词内义项的显著性
J Psycholinguist Res. 1989 Nov;18(6):577-612. doi: 10.1007/BF01067161.
5
Brain representations of lexical ambiguity: Disentangling homonymy, polysemy, and their meanings.词汇歧义的大脑表征:析取同形异义词、多义词及其意义。
Brain Lang. 2024 Jun;253:105426. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2024.105426. Epub 2024 May 29.
6
The truth about chickens and bats: ambiguity avoidance distinguishes types of polysemy.鸡和蝙蝠的真相:避免歧义区分多义词的类型。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul 1;24(7):1354-60. doi: 10.1177/0956797612472205. Epub 2013 May 30.
7
Sustained meaning activation for polysemous but not homonymous words: evidence from EEG.持续激活多义词而非同音异义词的意义:来自 EEG 的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Feb;68:126-38. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
8
The representation of polysemy: MEG evidence.多义词的表征:脑磁图证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Jan;18(1):97-109. doi: 10.1162/089892906775250003.
9
Children make use of relationships across meanings in word learning.儿童在学习单词时会利用跨意义的关系。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Jan;47(1):29-44. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000821. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
10
Probing the Representational Structure of Regular Polysemy via Sense Analogy Questions: Insights from Contextual Word Vectors.通过语境词向量探究规则多义词的表象结构:基于语义类比问题的新视角。
Cogn Sci. 2024 Mar;48(3):e13416. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13416.

引用本文的文献

1
Infinite Mixture Chaining: An Efficiency-Based Framework for the Dynamic Construction of Word Meaning.无限混合链:一种基于效率的词意义动态构建框架。
Open Mind (Camb). 2025 Jan 4;9:1-24. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00176. eCollection 2025.
2
Can large language models help augment English psycholinguistic datasets?大型语言模型能否帮助扩充英语心理语言学数据集?
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Sep;56(6):6082-6100. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02337-z. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
3
Contextual diversity during word learning through reading benefits generalisation of learned meanings to new contexts.
通过阅读在单词学习过程中引入语境多样性有利于将所学词义泛化到新的语境中。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Jul;76(7):1658-1671. doi: 10.1177/17470218221126976. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
4
Offline dominance and zeugmatic similarity normings of variably ambiguous words assessed against a neural language model (BERT).根据神经语言模型(BERT)评估的可变歧义词的离线优势和轭式相似性规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Jun;55(4):1537-1557. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01869-6. Epub 2022 Jun 10.