• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多义词的表征:脑磁图证据。

The representation of polysemy: MEG evidence.

作者信息

Pylkkänen Liina, Llinás Rodolfo, Murphy Gregory L

机构信息

Department of Linguistics, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Jan;18(1):97-109. doi: 10.1162/089892906775250003.

DOI:10.1162/089892906775250003
PMID:16417686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1351340/
Abstract

Most words in natural language are polysemous, that is, they can be used in more than one way. For example, paper can be used to refer to a substance made out of wood pulp or to a daily publication printed on that substance. Although virtually every sentence contains polysemy, there is little agreement as to how polysemy is represented in the mental lexicon. Do different uses of polysemous words involve access to a single representation or do our minds store distinct representations for each different sense? Here we investigated priming between senses with a combination of behavioral and magnetoencephalographic measures in order to test whether different senses of the same word involve identity or mere formal and semantic similarity. Our results show that polysemy effects are clearly distinct from similarity effects bilaterally. In the left hemisphere, sense-relatedness elicited shorter latencies of the M350 source, which has been hypothesized to index lexical activation. Concurrent activity in the right hemisphere, on the other hand, peaked later for sense-related than for unrelated target stimuli, suggesting competition between related senses. The obtained pattern of results supports models in which the representation of polysemy involves both representational identity and difference: Related senses connect to same abstract lexical representation, but are distinctly listed within that representation.

摘要

自然语言中的大多数单词都是多义词,也就是说,它们可以有不止一种用法。例如,“paper”可以用来指由木浆制成的物质,也可以指印在这种物质上的日报。尽管几乎每个句子都有多义现象,但对于多义现象在心理词典中是如何表示的,人们几乎没有达成共识。多义词的不同用法是涉及对单一表征的访问,还是我们的大脑为每种不同的意义存储了不同的表征?在这里,我们结合行为和脑磁图测量方法研究了不同意义之间的启动效应,以测试同一个单词的不同意义是涉及同一性还是仅仅涉及形式和语义上的相似性。我们的结果表明,多义效应在双侧明显不同于相似性效应。在左半球,意义相关性引发了M350源的潜伏期缩短,据推测M350源可索引词汇激活。另一方面,右半球的并发活动在与意义相关的目标刺激上比在不相关的目标刺激上达到峰值的时间更晚,这表明相关意义之间存在竞争。所获得的结果模式支持了这样的模型,即多义现象的表征既涉及表征同一性又涉及差异性:相关意义连接到相同的抽象词汇表征,但在该表征中被明确列出。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2450/1351340/36530622129d/nihms-7423-0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2450/1351340/f79fee7d9cdb/nihms-7423-0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2450/1351340/eb05a40e10e5/nihms-7423-0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2450/1351340/a8db401f14e4/nihms-7423-0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2450/1351340/36530622129d/nihms-7423-0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2450/1351340/f79fee7d9cdb/nihms-7423-0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2450/1351340/eb05a40e10e5/nihms-7423-0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2450/1351340/a8db401f14e4/nihms-7423-0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2450/1351340/36530622129d/nihms-7423-0004.jpg

相似文献

1
The representation of polysemy: MEG evidence.多义词的表征:脑磁图证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Jan;18(1):97-109. doi: 10.1162/089892906775250003.
2
Word Senses as Clusters of Meaning Modulations: A Computational Model of Polysemy.词义作为意义调制的聚类:一词多义的计算模型。
Cogn Sci. 2021 Apr;45(4):e12955. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12955.
3
Opposing effects of semantic diversity in lexical and semantic relatedness decisions.词汇和语义相关性判断中语义多样性的相反作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Apr;41(2):385-402. doi: 10.1037/a0038995. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
4
The effects of homonymy and polysemy on lexical access: an MEG study.同音异义词和多义词对词汇通达的影响:一项脑磁图研究。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Jun;24(1):57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.12.006.
5
Polysemy Advantage with Abstract But Not Concrete Words.抽象词而非具体词的一词多义优势。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2016 Feb;45(1):143-56. doi: 10.1007/s10936-014-9337-z.
6
Polysemy and the subjective lexicon: semantic relatedness and the salience of intraword senses.一词多义与主观词汇:语义相关性及词内义项的显著性
J Psycholinguist Res. 1989 Nov;18(6):577-612. doi: 10.1007/BF01067161.
7
Sustained meaning activation for polysemous but not homonymous words: evidence from EEG.持续激活多义词而非同音异义词的意义:来自 EEG 的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Feb;68:126-38. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
8
[The influence of semantic richness on the visual recognition of emotional words].[语义丰富度对情绪词汇视觉识别的影响]
Can J Exp Psychol. 2012 Mar;66(1):70-8. doi: 10.1037/a0027083.
9
Not all ambiguous words are created equal: an EEG investigation of homonymy and polysemy.并非所有歧义词汇都具有相同性质:同音异义词和多义词的 EEG 研究。
Brain Lang. 2012 Oct;123(1):11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.06.007. Epub 2012 Jul 21.
10
Reading in a deep orthography: neuromagnetic evidence for dual-mechanisms.深度正字法阅读:双机制的神经磁学证据。
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jun;180(2):247-62. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-0852-0. Epub 2007 Jan 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Manner/result polysemy as contextual allosemy: Evidence from Daakaka.作为语境异体的方式/结果多义性:来自达卡卡语的证据。
Nat Lang Linguist Theory. 2025;43(1):273-330. doi: 10.1007/s11049-024-09616-6. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
2
The effects of aging and perceived loneliness on lexical ambiguity resolution.衰老和感知到的孤独对词汇歧义消解的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 20;13:978616. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.978616. eCollection 2022.
3
Representation of Different Types of Adjectival Polysemy in the Mental Lexicon.心理词库中不同类型形容词多义性的表征。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 29;12:742064. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.742064. eCollection 2021.
4
Metaphor Is Between Metonymy and Homonymy: Evidence From Event-Related Potentials.隐喻介于转喻和同音异义词之间:来自事件相关电位的证据。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 1;11:2113. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02113. eCollection 2020.
5
How the brain composes morphemes into meaning.大脑如何将语素组合成意义。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Feb 3;375(1791):20190311. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0311. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
6
Neurocognitive correlates of category ambiguous verb processing: The single versus dual lexical entry hypotheses.类别模糊动词加工的神经认知相关性:单一与双重词汇条目假说。
Brain Lang. 2019 Jul;194:65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 May 16.
7
Your favorite number is special (to you): Evidence for item-level differences in retrieval of information from numerals.你最喜欢的数字是特殊的(对你而言):从数字中检索信息的项目水平差异的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Aug;117:253-260. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.05.018. Epub 2018 May 22.
8
Number of Meanings and Number of Senses: An ERP Study of Sublexical Ambiguities in Reading Chinese Disyllabic Compounds.意义数量与义项数量:一项关于阅读中文双音节复合词中次词汇歧义的事件相关电位研究
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 29;9:324. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00324. eCollection 2018.
9
The Mental Representation of Polysemy across Word Classes.多义词在不同词性中的心理表征
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 21;9:192. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00192. eCollection 2018.
10
Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.幸存的盲目分解:复杂单词识别时间进程的分布分析。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Nov;43(11):1793-1820. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000411. Epub 2017 Apr 27.

本文引用的文献

1
The meaning-frequency relationship of words.单词的意义-频率关系。
J Gen Psychol. 1945;33:251-6. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1945.10544509.
2
The effects of homonymy and polysemy on lexical access: an MEG study.同音异义词和多义词对词汇通达的影响:一项脑磁图研究。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Jun;24(1):57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.12.006.
3
The precise time course of lexical activation: MEG measurements of the effects of frequency, probability, and density in lexical decision.词汇激活的精确时间进程:词汇判断中频率、概率和密度效应的脑磁图测量
Brain Lang. 2004 Jul-Sep;90(1-3):88-94. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00422-X.
4
Neural correlates of the effects of morphological family frequency and family size: an MEG study.形态学词族频率和词族大小效应的神经关联:一项脑磁图研究
Cognition. 2004 Apr;91(3):B35-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.008.
5
ERPs reflect lexical identification in word fragment priming.事件相关电位反映了词片段启动中的词汇识别。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 May;16(4):541-52. doi: 10.1162/089892904323057281.
6
Cortical effects of shifting letter position in letter strings of varying length.不同长度字母串中字母位置移动的皮层效应。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Jul 1;15(5):731-46. doi: 10.1162/089892903322307447.
7
Working memory and lexical ambiguity resolution as revealed by ERPs: a difficult case for activation theories.事件相关电位揭示的工作记忆与词汇歧义消解:激活理论面临的一个难题
J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Jul 1;15(5):643-57. doi: 10.1162/089892903322307366.
8
Tracking the time course of word recognition with MEG.利用脑磁图追踪单词识别的时间进程。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 May;7(5):187-189. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00092-5.
9
Spatiotemporal dynamics of modality-specific and supramodal word processing.特定模态和超模态单词处理的时空动态
Neuron. 2003 May 8;38(3):487-97. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00197-1.
10
N400-like magnetoencephalography responses modulated by semantic context, word frequency, and lexical class in sentences.句子中受语义语境、词频和词汇类别调制的类N400脑磁图反应
Neuroimage. 2002 Nov;17(3):1101-16. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1268.