Suppr超能文献

2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的引产:英国对实践影响的全国性调查。

Induction of labour during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national survey of impact on practice in the UK.

作者信息

Harkness M, Yuill C, Cheyne H, Stock S J, McCourt C

机构信息

Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit (NMHAP-RU), University of Stirling, Pathfoot Building, Stirling, FK9 4NF, UK.

Centre for Maternal and Child Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, 1 Myddleton Street, London, EC1R 1UB, UK.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Apr 19;21(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03781-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Induction of labour (IOL) is one of the most commonly performed interventions in maternity care, with outpatient cervical ripening increasingly offered as an option for women undergoing IOL. The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the context of practice and the option of returning home for cervical ripening may now assume greater significance. This work aimed to examine whether and how the COVID-19 pandemic has changed practice around IOL in the UK.

METHOD

We used an online questionnaire to survey senior obstetricians and midwives at all 156 UK NHS Trusts and Boards that currently offer maternity services. Responses were analysed to produce descriptive statistics, with free text responses analysed using a conventional content analysis approach.

FINDINGS

Responses were received from 92 of 156 UK Trusts and Boards, a 59% response rate. Many Trusts and Boards reported no change to their IOL practice, however 23% reported change in methods used for cervical ripening; 28% a change in criteria for home cervical ripening; 28% stated that more women were returning home during cervical ripening; and 24% noted changes to women's response to recommendations for IOL. Much of the change was reported as happening in response to attempts to minimise hospital attendance and restrictions on birth partners accompanying women.

CONCLUSIONS

The pandemic has changed practice around induction of labour, although this varied significantly between NHS Trusts and Boards. There is a lack of formal evidence to support decision-making around outpatient cervical ripening: the basis on which changes were implemented and what evidence was used to inform decisions is not clear.

摘要

背景

引产是产科护理中最常见的干预措施之一,门诊宫颈成熟度预处理作为引产女性的一种选择越来越多地被采用。2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行改变了医疗实践环境,回家进行宫颈成熟度预处理这一选择现在可能具有更大的意义。这项研究旨在调查COVID-19大流行是否以及如何改变了英国引产的医疗实践。

方法

我们通过在线问卷对英国目前提供产科服务的156家国民保健服务信托基金和委员会的资深产科医生和助产士进行了调查。对回复进行分析以生成描述性统计数据,对自由文本回复采用传统的内容分析方法进行分析。

结果

收到了英国156家信托基金和委员会中92家的回复,回复率为59%。许多信托基金和委员会报告称其引产实践没有变化,然而,23%报告宫颈成熟度预处理方法有变化;28%报告家庭宫颈成熟度预处理标准有变化;28%表示宫颈成熟度预处理期间回家的女性增多;24%指出女性对引产建议的反应有变化。据报告,大部分变化是为了尽量减少住院次数以及应对对陪同女性的分娩伴侣的限制而发生的。

结论

大流行改变了引产的医疗实践,尽管英国国民保健服务信托基金和委员会之间差异很大。缺乏支持门诊宫颈成熟度预处理决策的正式证据:实施这些变化的依据以及用于为决策提供信息的证据尚不清楚。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8791/8054405/e36726aa2dcd/12884_2021_3781_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验