Policlinic for Rheumatology & Hiller Research Unit for Rheumatology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, University Clinic, Moorenstr, 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Ortenau Klinikum Offenburg-Kehl, Offenburg, Germany.
Arthritis Res Ther. 2021 Apr 19;23(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13075-021-02500-3.
Mobile medical applications (Apps) offer innovative solutions for patients' self-monitoring and new patient management opportunities. Prior to routine clinical application feasibility and acceptance of disease surveillance using an App that includes electronic (e) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) warrant evaluation. Therefore, we performed a proof-of-concept study in which rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients used an App (RheumaLive) to document their disease.
Accurate PROM reporting via an App in comparison to paper-based versions was investigated to exclude media bias. Sixty participants recruited from 268 consecutive RA outpatients completed paper-based and electronic PROMs (Hannover Functional Questionnaire/derived HAQ; modified RA disease activity index) using the App at baseline and follow-up visits. Between visits, patients used their App on their own smartphone according to their preferences. The equivalence of PROM data and user experiences from patients and physicians were evaluated.
Patients' (78.3% female) mean (SD) age was 50.1 (13.1) years, disease duration 10.5 (9.1) years, and paper-based HAQ 0.78 (0.59). Mean confidence in Apps scored 3.5 (1.1, Likert scale 1 to 6). ePROMs' scores obtained by patients' data entry in the App were equivalent to paper-based ones and preferred by the patients. After 3 months, the App retention rate was 71.7%. Patients' overall satisfaction with the App was 2.2 (0.9, Likert scale 1 to 6). Patients and physicians valued the App, i.e., for patient-physician interaction: 87% reported that it was easier for them to document the course of the disease using the App than "only" answering questions about their current health during routine outpatient visits. Further App use was recommended in 77.3% of the patients, and according to physicians, in seven patients, the App use contributed to an increased adherence to therapy.
Our study provides an essential basis for the broader implementation of medical Apps in routine care. We demonstrated the feasibility and acceptance of disease surveillance using a smartphone App in RA. App use was convincing as a reliable option to perform continuous, remote monitoring of disease activity and treatment efficacy.
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02565225 . Registered on September 16, 2015 (retrospectively registered).
移动医疗应用(Apps)为患者的自我监测提供了创新的解决方案,并为新的患者管理机会提供了可能。在常规临床应用之前,需要评估使用包含电子(e)患者报告结局测量(PROMs)的 App 进行疾病监测的可行性和可接受性。因此,我们进行了一项概念验证研究,其中类风湿关节炎(RA)患者使用 App(RheumaLive)来记录他们的病情。
为了排除媒体偏见,我们研究了通过 App 进行准确的 PROM 报告与纸质版本的比较。从 268 名连续的 RA 门诊患者中招募了 60 名参与者,他们在基线和随访就诊时使用 App 完成了纸质和电子 PROMs(汉诺威功能问卷/衍生的 HAQ;改良的 RA 疾病活动指数)。在就诊之间,患者根据自己的喜好在自己的智能手机上使用他们的 App。评估了 PROM 数据的等效性以及患者和医生的用户体验。
患者(78.3%为女性)的平均(SD)年龄为 50.1(13.1)岁,疾病持续时间为 10.5(9.1)年,纸质版 HAQ 为 0.78(0.59)。患者对 App 的平均信心评分为 3.5(1.1,Likert 量表 1 到 6)。患者通过在 App 中输入数据获得的电子 PROM 评分与纸质版相当,并且受到患者的青睐。3 个月后,App 的保留率为 71.7%。患者对 App 的总体满意度为 2.2(0.9,Likert 量表 1 到 6)。患者和医生都重视 App,即对于医患互动:87%的患者表示,使用 App 记录疾病过程比在常规门诊就诊时仅回答有关当前健康状况的问题更容易。77.3%的患者建议进一步使用 App,根据医生的说法,在七名患者中,App 的使用有助于提高治疗依从性。
我们的研究为在常规护理中更广泛地实施医疗 Apps 提供了重要依据。我们证明了使用智能手机 App 进行疾病监测的可行性和可接受性。App 的使用是一种可靠的选择,可以进行连续的、远程的疾病活动和治疗效果监测。
ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02565225。2015 年 9 月 16 日注册(追溯注册)。