• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与外展手术诊所相关的碳足迹减少。

Carbon footprint reduction associated with a surgical outreach clinic.

机构信息

Division of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Apr 19;50(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40463-021-00510-4.

DOI:10.1186/s40463-021-00510-4
PMID:33875009
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8054848/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthcare systems generate substantial carbon footprints that may be targeted to decrease greenhouse gas emissions. Outreach clinics may represent tools to assist in this reduction by optimizing patient related travel. Therefore, we sought to estimate the carbon footprint savings associated with a head and neck surgery outreach clinic.

METHODS

This study was a cross-sectional survey of patient travel patterns to a surgical outreach clinic compared to a regional cancer treatment centre from December 2019 to February 2020. Participants completed a self-administered survey of 12 items eliciting travel distance, vehicle details, and ability to combine medical appointments. Canadian datasets of manufacturer provided vehicular efficiency were used to estimate carbon emissions for each participant. Geographic information systems were used for analyses.

RESULTS

One hundred thirteen patients were included for analysis. The majority of patients (85.8%) used their own personal vehicle to travel to the outreach clinic. The median distance to the clinic and regional centre were 29.0 km (IQR 6.0-51.9) and 327.0 km (IQR 309.0-337.0) respectively. The mean carbon emission reduction per person was therefore 117,495.4 g (SD: 29,040.0) to 143,570.9 g (SD: 40,236.0). This represents up to 2.5% of an average individual's yearly carbon footprint. Fewer than 10% of patients indicated they were able to carpool or group their appointments.

CONCLUSION

Surgical outreach clinics decrease carbon footprints associated with patient travel compared to continued care at a regional centre. Further research is needed to determine possible interventions to further reduce carbon emissions associated with the surgical care of patients.

摘要

背景

医疗保健系统会产生大量的碳足迹,这些足迹可能是减少温室气体排放的目标。外展诊所可以通过优化与患者相关的旅行来协助实现这一减排目标。因此,我们旨在评估头颈外科外展诊所相关的碳足迹节约。

方法

本研究为 2019 年 12 月至 2020 年 2 月对手术外展诊所与区域癌症治疗中心的患者旅行模式进行的横断面调查。参与者完成了一项包含 12 个项目的自我管理调查,这些项目包括旅行距离、车辆细节和合并医疗预约的能力。使用制造商提供的车辆效率加拿大数据集来估算每位参与者的碳排放量。使用地理信息系统进行分析。

结果

共纳入 113 例患者进行分析。大多数患者(85.8%)使用自己的私人车辆前往外展诊所。诊所和区域中心的中位数距离分别为 29.0 公里(IQR6.0-51.9)和 327.0 公里(IQR309.0-337.0)。因此,每人的平均碳减排量为 117,495.4 克(SD:29,040.0)至 143,570.9 克(SD:40,236.0)。这代表了一个人平均年碳足迹的 2.5%。不到 10%的患者表示他们能够拼车或安排他们的预约。

结论

与在区域中心继续接受治疗相比,外科外展诊所可减少与患者旅行相关的碳足迹。需要进一步研究以确定可能的干预措施,以进一步减少与患者外科护理相关的碳排放。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/016b/8056696/84b3c6568cf6/40463_2021_510_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/016b/8056696/30d204c1770e/40463_2021_510_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/016b/8056696/84b3c6568cf6/40463_2021_510_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/016b/8056696/30d204c1770e/40463_2021_510_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/016b/8056696/84b3c6568cf6/40463_2021_510_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Carbon footprint reduction associated with a surgical outreach clinic.与外展手术诊所相关的碳足迹减少。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Apr 19;50(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40463-021-00510-4.
2
Travel Distance Between Participants in US Telemedicine Sessions With Estimates of Emissions Savings: Observational Study.美国远程医疗会议中参与者之间的旅行距离及减排量估算:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 15;26:e53437. doi: 10.2196/53437.
3
Carbon footprint of patient journeys through primary care: a mixed methods approach.患者在初级保健中的旅程的碳足迹:一种混合方法。
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Sep;63(614):e595-603. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X671579.
4
American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Annual Meeting All-in-person Attendance Results in Immense Carbon Expenditure.美国矫形足踝外科学会年会全员现场参会导致巨大碳支出。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Dec 1;481(12):2469-2480. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002764. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
5
Travel-associated cost savings to patients and the health system through provision of specialist head and neck surgery outreach clinics in rural New South Wales, Australia.通过在澳大利亚新南威尔士州农村地区提供专科头颈外科外展诊所,为患者和医疗系统节省旅行费用。
Aust J Rural Health. 2023 Oct;31(5):932-943. doi: 10.1111/ajr.13021. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
6
The impact of telemedicine on greenhouse gas emissions at an academic health science center in Canada.加拿大某学术健康科学中心的远程医疗对温室气体排放的影响。
Telemed J E Health. 2010 Nov;16(9):973-6. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2010.0057. Epub 2010 Oct 19.
7
Taking a bite out of Scotland's dental carbon emissions in the transition to a low carbon future.在向低碳未来过渡的过程中,减少苏格兰牙科的碳排放。
Public Health. 2012 Sep;126(9):770-7. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2012.05.032. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
8
The environmental impact of surgical telemedicine: life cycle assessment of virtual vs. in-person preoperative evaluations for benign foregut disease.外科远程医疗的环境影响:良性前肠疾病虚拟与面对面术前评估的生命周期评估。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5696-5702. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10131-9. Epub 2023 May 26.
9
Carbon footprint of a laser unit: a study of two centres in the UK.激光设备的碳足迹:英国两个中心的研究。
Lasers Med Sci. 2024 May 21;39(1):134. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04081-4.
10
Sources of Variation in the Carbon Footprint of Hemodialysis Treatment.血液透析治疗碳足迹的变化来源。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022 Sep;33(9):1790-1795. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2022010086. Epub 2022 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Environmental sustainability in gynecologic oncology.妇科肿瘤学中的环境可持续性
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2024 Sep 10;55:101499. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2024.101499. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
[Pilot trial on the detection of patients with undiagnosed diabetes mellitus type 2 performed in community pharmacies in Valladolid. Environmental impact evaluation].[在巴利亚多利德社区药房开展的2型未确诊糖尿病患者检测试点试验。环境影响评估]
Farm Comunitarios. 2023 Mar 17;15(2):12-19. doi: 10.33620/FC.2173-9218.(2023).11. eCollection 2023 Apr 14.
3
Carbon Footprint Reduction Associated With Multidisciplinary Pediatric Airway Clinics: A Program Evaluation Study.

本文引用的文献

1
The carbon footprint of the Chinese health-care system: an environmentally extended input-output and structural path analysis study.中国医疗体系的碳足迹:基于环境扩展投入产出和结构路径分析的研究
Lancet Planet Health. 2019 Oct;3(10):e413-e419. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30192-5.
2
Reducing Pollution From the Health Care Industry.减少医疗保健行业的污染。
JAMA. 2019 Sep 17;322(11):1043-1044. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.10823.
3
Addressing the carbon footprint of health organisations: eight lessons for implementation.应对卫生组织的碳足迹:实施的八点经验教训。
多学科儿科气道诊所相关的碳足迹减少:一项项目评估研究。
OTO Open. 2024 Jul 4;8(3):e167. doi: 10.1002/oto2.167. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
4
Improving Access to Care, Patient Costs, and Environmental Impact Through a Community Outreach Lung Cancer Rapid Assessment Clinic.通过社区外展肺癌快速评估诊所改善医疗服务可及性、患者费用和环境影响。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2024 Aug;20(8):1123-1131. doi: 10.1200/OP.23.00657. Epub 2024 May 2.
5
Low-Carbon Action in Full Swing: A Study on Satisfaction with Wise Medical Development.低碳行动全面展开:智慧医疗发展满意度研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 16;19(8):4858. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084858.
Public Health Res Pract. 2018 Dec 6;28(4):2841830. doi: 10.17061/phrp2841830.
4
Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers.通过生产者和消费者减少食物对环境的影响。
Science. 2018 Jun 1;360(6392):987-992. doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0216.
5
The carbon footprint of Australian health care.澳大利亚医疗保健的碳足迹。
Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Jan;2(1):e27-e35. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30180-8. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
6
Measuring the carbon footprint of plastic surgery: A preliminary experience in a Chilean teaching hospital.测量整形手术的碳足迹:智利一家教学医院的初步经验。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Dec;70(12):1777-1779. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
7
Measuring financial toxicity as a clinically relevant patient-reported outcome: The validation of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST).将财务毒性作为临床相关的患者报告结局进行测量:财务毒性综合评分(COST)的验证。
Cancer. 2017 Feb 1;123(3):476-484. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30369. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
8
Health Services Research and Regionalization of Care-From Policy to Practice: the Ontario Experience in Head and Neck Cancer.卫生服务研究与医疗区域化:从政策到实践——安大略省头颈癌治疗经验
Curr Oncol Rep. 2016 Mar;18(3):19. doi: 10.1007/s11912-016-0500-6.
9
Carbon footprint of telemedicine solutions--unexplored opportunity for reducing carbon emissions in the health sector.远程医疗解决方案的碳足迹——卫生部门减少碳排放的未被发掘的机会。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 4;9(9):e105040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105040. eCollection 2014.
10
Carbon footprint of patient journeys through primary care: a mixed methods approach.患者在初级保健中的旅程的碳足迹:一种混合方法。
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Sep;63(614):e595-603. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X671579.