• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生理机器学习模型在预测住院成人脓毒症中的应用:综合评价。

Physiological machine learning models for prediction of sepsis in hospitalized adults: An integrative review.

机构信息

University of Virginia School of Nursing, Charlottesville, VA, USA; University of Virginia Center for Advanced Medical Analytics, Charlottesville, VA, USA; School of Data Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

University of Virginia School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Charlottesville, VA, USA; University of Virginia Center for Advanced Medical Analytics, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

出版信息

Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2021 Aug;65:103035. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103035. Epub 2021 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103035
PMID:33875337
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diagnosing sepsis remains challenging. Data compiled from continuous monitoring and electronic health records allow for new opportunities to compute predictions based on machine learning techniques. There has been a lack of consensus identifying best practices for model development and validation towards early identification of sepsis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the modeling approach and statistical methodology of machine learning prediction models for sepsis in the adult hospital population.

METHODS

PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guided protocol development. We evaluated studies that developed or validated physiologic sepsis prediction models or implemented a model in the hospital environment.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, and the AUROC of the prediction models ranged from 0.61 to 0.96. We found a variety of sepsis definitions, methods used for event adjudication, model parameters used, and modeling methods. Two studies tested models in clinical settings; the results suggested that patient outcomes were improved with implementation of machine learning models.

CONCLUSION

Nurses have a unique perspective to offer in the development and implementation of machine learning models detecting patients at risk for sepsis. More work is needed in developing model harmonization standards and testing in clinical settings.

摘要

背景

脓毒症的诊断仍然具有挑战性。从连续监测和电子健康记录中收集的数据为基于机器学习技术进行预测提供了新的机会。在确定用于早期识别脓毒症的模型开发和验证的最佳实践方面,尚未达成共识。

目的

评估机器学习预测模型在成人医院人群中脓毒症的建模方法和统计方法。

方法

根据系统评价的首选报告项目指南制定方案,检索了 PubMed、CINAHL 和 Cochrane 数据库。我们评估了开发或验证生理脓毒症预测模型或在医院环境中实施模型的研究。

结果

符合纳入标准的有 14 项研究,预测模型的 AUC 值范围为 0.61 至 0.96。我们发现了各种脓毒症定义、用于事件裁决的方法、使用的模型参数和建模方法。有两项研究在临床环境中测试了模型;结果表明,实施机器学习模型可改善患者的预后。

结论

护士在开发和实施检测脓毒症风险患者的机器学习模型方面具有独特的视角。需要进一步努力制定模型协调标准并在临床环境中进行测试。

相似文献

1
Physiological machine learning models for prediction of sepsis in hospitalized adults: An integrative review.生理机器学习模型在预测住院成人脓毒症中的应用:综合评价。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2021 Aug;65:103035. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103035. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
2
Prediction of In-hospital Mortality in Emergency Department Patients With Sepsis: A Local Big Data-Driven, Machine Learning Approach.急诊科脓毒症患者院内死亡率的预测:一种基于本地大数据驱动的机器学习方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):269-78. doi: 10.1111/acem.12876. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
3
Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.机器学习在脓毒症预测中的应用:诊断试验准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Mar;46(3):383-400. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05872-y. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
4
Prediction of sepsis patients using machine learning approach: A meta-analysis.基于机器学习的脓毒症患者预测:一项荟萃分析。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 Mar;170:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.12.027. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
5
Assessing the effects of data drift on the performance of machine learning models used in clinical sepsis prediction.评估数据漂移对临床脓毒症预测中使用的机器学习模型性能的影响。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 May;173:104930. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104930. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
6
Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis-related death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器学习在脓毒症相关死亡预测中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Dec 11;23(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02383-1.
7
Using machine learning methods to predict in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in the ICU.使用机器学习方法预测 ICU 中脓毒症患者的院内死亡率。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01271-2.
8
Data-driven modeling and prediction of blood glucose dynamics: Machine learning applications in type 1 diabetes.基于数据驱动的血糖动力学建模与预测:机器学习在 1 型糖尿病中的应用。
Artif Intell Med. 2019 Jul;98:109-134. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
9
Machine Learning-Based Early Warning Systems for Clinical Deterioration: Systematic Scoping Review.基于机器学习的临床恶化预警系统:系统范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 4;23(2):e25187. doi: 10.2196/25187.
10
Multicentre validation of a sepsis prediction algorithm using only vital sign data in the emergency department, general ward and ICU.仅使用生命体征数据在急诊科、普通病房和重症监护病房对脓毒症预测算法进行多中心验证。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 26;8(1):e017833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017833.

引用本文的文献

1
Improved Interpretability Without Performance Reduction in a Sepsis Prediction Risk Score.在脓毒症预测风险评分中提高可解释性且不降低性能
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jan 28;15(3):307. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15030307.
2
Developing a rapid screening tool for high-risk ICU patients of sepsis: integrating electronic medical records with machine learning methods for mortality prediction in hospitalized patients-model establishment, internal and external validation, and visualization.开发一种用于重症监护病房(ICU)脓毒症高危患者的快速筛查工具:将电子病历与机器学习方法相结合以预测住院患者的死亡率——模型建立、内部和外部验证以及可视化。
J Transl Med. 2025 Jan 21;23(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06102-4.
3
Early detection of sepsis using machine learning algorithms: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
使用机器学习算法早期检测败血症:一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 16;11:1491358. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1491358. eCollection 2024.
4
Machine Learning for Predicting Stillbirth: A Systematic Review.用于预测死产的机器学习:一项系统综述
Reprod Sci. 2025 May;32(5):1388-1398. doi: 10.1007/s43032-024-01655-z. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
5
Real-Time Prediction of Sepsis in Critical Trauma Patients: Machine Learning-Based Modeling Study.重症创伤患者脓毒症的实时预测:基于机器学习的建模研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Mar 31;7:e42452. doi: 10.2196/42452.
6
Prior Distribution Estimation of Monitored Information in the Intensive Care Unit with the Hidden Markov Model and Decision Tree Methods.基于隐马尔可夫模型和决策树方法的 ICU 监测信息的先验分布估计。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Mar 24;2022:7892408. doi: 10.1155/2022/7892408. eCollection 2022.