Li Qingyuan, Li Pan, Chen Junyu, Ren Ruyu, Ren Ni, Xia Yinyin
Department of Clinical Medicine, International Medical College of Chongqing Medical University, Yixueyuan Road No.1, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400016, China.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Zhongshan Road, No.319 Section 3, Luzhou, 646000, China.
Reprod Sci. 2025 May;32(5):1388-1398. doi: 10.1007/s43032-024-01655-z. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
Stillbirth is a major global issue, with over 5 million cases each year. The multifactorial nature of stillbirth makes it difficult to predict. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have the potential to enhance clinical decision-making and enable precise assessments. This study reviewed the literature on predictive ML models for stillbirth highlighting input characteristics, performance metrics, and validation. The PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases were searched for studies using AI to develop predictive models for stillbirth. Findings were analyzed qualitatively using narrative synthesis and graphics. Risk of bias and the applicability of the studies were assessed using PROBAST. Model design and performance were discussed. Eight studies involving 14,840,654 women with gestational ages ranging from 20 weeks to full term were included in the qualitative analysis. Most studies used neural networks, random forests, and logistic regression algorithms. The number of predictive features varied from 14 to 53. Only 50% of studies validated the models. Cross-validation was commonly employed, and only 25% of studies performed external validation. All studies reported area under the curve as a performance metric (range 0.54-0.9), and five studies reported sensitivity (range, 60- 90%) and specificity (range, 64 - 93.3%). A stacked ensemble model that analyzed 53 features performed better than other models (AUC = 0.9; sensitivity and specificity > 85%). Available ML models can attain a considerable degree of accuracy for prediction of stillbirth; however, these models require further development before they can be applied in a clinical setting.
死产是一个重大的全球性问题,每年有超过500万例。死产的多因素性质使其难以预测。人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)有潜力加强临床决策并实现精确评估。本研究回顾了关于死产预测性ML模型的文献,重点介绍了输入特征、性能指标和验证情况。在PubMed、Cochrane和Web of Science数据库中检索使用AI开发死产预测模型的研究。使用叙述性综合和图表对研究结果进行定性分析。使用PROBAST评估研究的偏倚风险和适用性。讨论了模型设计和性能。定性分析纳入了八项研究,涉及14,840,654名孕周从20周至足月的女性。大多数研究使用神经网络、随机森林和逻辑回归算法。预测特征的数量从14个到53个不等。只有50%的研究对模型进行了验证。常用交叉验证,只有25%的研究进行了外部验证。所有研究均报告曲线下面积作为性能指标(范围为0.54 - 0.9),五项研究报告了敏感性(范围为60 - 90%)和特异性(范围为64 - 93.3%)。一个分析53个特征的堆叠集成模型比其他模型表现更好(AUC = 0.9;敏感性和特异性> 85%)。现有的ML模型在死产预测方面可以达到相当高的准确度;然而,这些模型在应用于临床环境之前还需要进一步开发。