• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体和群体觅食在具有人为干预的自主搜索代理中。

Individual and collective foraging in autonomous search agents with human intervention.

机构信息

Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, Merced, USA.

Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Merced, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 19;11(1):8492. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87717-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-87717-7
PMID:33875697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8055653/
Abstract

Humans and other complex organisms exhibit intelligent behaviors as individual agents and as groups of coordinated agents. They can switch between independent and collective modes of behavior, and flexible switching can be advantageous for adapting to ongoing changes in conditions. In the present study, we investigated the flexibility between independent and collective modes of behavior in a simulated social foraging task designed to benefit from both modes: distancing among ten foraging agents promoted faster detection of resources, whereas flocking promoted faster consumption. There was a tradeoff between faster detection versus faster consumption, but both factors contributed to foraging success. Results showed that group foraging performance among simulated agents was enhanced by loose coupling that balanced distancing and flocking among agents and enabled them to fluidly switch among a variety of groupings. We also examined the effects of more sophisticated cognitive capacities by studying how human players improve performance when they control one of the search agents. Results showed that human intervention further enhanced group performance with loosely coupled agents, and human foragers performed better when coordinating with loosely coupled agents. Humans players adapted their balance of independent versus collective search modes in response to the dynamics of simulated agents, thereby demonstrating the importance of adaptive flexibility in social foraging.

摘要

人类和其他复杂生物作为个体和协调的群体表现出智能行为。它们可以在独立和集体的行为模式之间切换,灵活的切换对于适应条件的持续变化是有利的。在本研究中,我们在一个模拟的社会觅食任务中研究了独立和集体行为模式之间的灵活性,这个任务旨在从两种模式中受益:十个觅食代理之间的距离可以促进更快地检测到资源,而群体聚集则可以促进更快地消耗资源。更快地检测和更快地消耗之间存在权衡,但这两个因素都有助于觅食成功。结果表明,通过松散耦合可以增强模拟代理之间的群体觅食表现,这种松散耦合可以平衡代理之间的距离和聚集,使它们能够在各种分组之间流畅地切换。我们还通过研究人类玩家在控制一个搜索代理时如何提高性能来检查更复杂认知能力的影响。结果表明,在松散耦合的代理中,人类干预进一步增强了群体表现,并且当人类觅食者与松散耦合的代理协调时,表现更好。人类玩家根据模拟代理的动态调整独立搜索模式和集体搜索模式的平衡,从而证明了在社会觅食中适应性灵活性的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b875/8055653/a20b758b97c8/41598_2021_87717_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b875/8055653/83e06c0d171c/41598_2021_87717_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b875/8055653/6b04ad5c0d0c/41598_2021_87717_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b875/8055653/f31c511c37c4/41598_2021_87717_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b875/8055653/cc7c14941203/41598_2021_87717_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b875/8055653/72314a2aed43/41598_2021_87717_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b875/8055653/d2890013b47c/41598_2021_87717_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b875/8055653/714bae1649db/41598_2021_87717_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b875/8055653/e3ea10e2bc44/41598_2021_87717_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b875/8055653/7feb9e7e9172/41598_2021_87717_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b875/8055653/0ab29aa8ce3d/41598_2021_87717_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b875/8055653/a20b758b97c8/41598_2021_87717_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b875/8055653/83e06c0d171c/41598_2021_87717_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b875/8055653/6b04ad5c0d0c/41598_2021_87717_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b875/8055653/f31c511c37c4/41598_2021_87717_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b875/8055653/cc7c14941203/41598_2021_87717_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b875/8055653/72314a2aed43/41598_2021_87717_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b875/8055653/d2890013b47c/41598_2021_87717_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b875/8055653/714bae1649db/41598_2021_87717_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b875/8055653/e3ea10e2bc44/41598_2021_87717_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b875/8055653/7feb9e7e9172/41598_2021_87717_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b875/8055653/0ab29aa8ce3d/41598_2021_87717_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b875/8055653/a20b758b97c8/41598_2021_87717_Fig11_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Individual and collective foraging in autonomous search agents with human intervention.个体和群体觅食在具有人为干预的自主搜索代理中。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 19;11(1):8492. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87717-7.
2
Adaptive collective foraging in groups with conflicting nutritional needs.具有冲突营养需求的群体中的自适应集体觅食。
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Apr 13;3(4):150638. doi: 10.1098/rsos.150638. eCollection 2016 Apr.
3
Collective foraging in spatially complex nutritional environments.在空间复杂的营养环境中的集体觅食。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Aug 19;372(1727). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0238.
4
Collective learning from individual experiences and information transfer during group foraging.个体经验的集体学习和群体觅食过程中的信息传递。
J R Soc Interface. 2019 Feb 28;16(151):20180803. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0803.
5
Identifying robustness in the regulation of collective foraging of ant colonies using an interaction-based model with backward bifurcation.使用具有反向分岔的基于相互作用的模型来识别蚁群集体觅食调节中的稳健性。
J Theor Biol. 2015 Feb 21;367:61-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.11.026. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
6
Individual and collective problem-solving in a foraging context in the leaf-cutting ant Atta colombica.哥伦比亚切叶蚁在觅食环境中的个体与群体问题解决行为
Anim Cogn. 2009 Jan;12(1):21-30. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0165-0. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
7
Comparison of solitary and collective foraging strategies of in patchy food distributions.比较 在斑块状食物分布中的单独和集体觅食策略。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Sep 14;375(1807):20190382. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0382. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
8
Synergistic Benefits of Group Search in Rats.大鼠群体搜索的协同效益。
Curr Biol. 2020 Dec 7;30(23):4733-4738.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.079. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
9
Regulation of harvester ant foraging as a closed-loop excitable system.作为一个闭环激发系统来调控收获蚁的觅食行为。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Dec 4;14(12):e1006200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006200. eCollection 2018 Dec.
10
The hidden cost of information in collective foraging.集体觅食中信息的隐性成本。
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Aug 22;272(1573):1689-95. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3137.

引用本文的文献

1
Heterogeneous foraging swarms can be better.异质觅食群体可能会更好。
Front Robot AI. 2025 Jan 20;11:1426282. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1426282. eCollection 2024.
2
Visual social information use in collective foraging.视觉社交信息在集体觅食中的应用。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 May 3;20(5):e1012087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012087. eCollection 2024 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Collective learning from individual experiences and information transfer during group foraging.个体经验的集体学习和群体觅食过程中的信息传递。
J R Soc Interface. 2019 Feb 28;16(151):20180803. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2018.0803.
2
Quantifying uncertainty due to fission-fusion dynamics as a component of social complexity.量化裂变融合动态作为社会复杂性组成部分的不确定性。
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 May 30;285(1879). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0532.
3
Collective foraging in spatially complex nutritional environments.在空间复杂的营养环境中的集体觅食。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Aug 19;372(1727). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0238.
4
Social foraging and individual consistency in following behaviour: testing the information centre hypothesis in free-ranging vultures.社会觅食与跟随行为中的个体一致性:在自由放养的秃鹫中检验信息中心假说
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Apr 12;284(1852). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2654.
5
Self-organized sorting limits behavioral variability in swarms.自组织排序限制了群体行为的可变性。
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 23;6:31808. doi: 10.1038/srep31808.
6
When is it time to move to the next map? Optimal foraging in guided visual search.什么时候该切换到下一张地图?引导式视觉搜索中的最优觅食。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Oct;78(7):2135-51. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1128-1.
7
Emergent Collective Chemotaxis without Single-Cell Gradient Sensing.无需单细胞梯度感知的紧急集体趋化作用。
Phys Rev Lett. 2016 Mar 4;116(9):098101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.098101. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
8
Optimizing the search for resources by sharing information: Mongolian gazelles as a case study.通过共享信息优化资源搜索:以蒙古瞪羚为例
Phys Rev Lett. 2013 Jun 14;110(24):248106. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.248106.
9
Collective foraging in heterogeneous landscapes.异质景观中的集体觅食
J R Soc Interface. 2014 Nov 6;11(100):20140674. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0674.
10
Bird sky networks: how do avian scavengers use social information to find carrion?鸟类的天空网络:食腐鸟类如何利用社会信息寻找腐肉?
Ecology. 2014 Jul;95(7):1799-808. doi: 10.1890/13-0574.1.