Cancer Risk Factors and Lifestyle Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Via Cosimo il Vecchio 2, 50141, Florence, Italy.
Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 19;11(1):8524. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88077-y.
Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC) are more frequent among men, but women (especially those aged < 40 years) have experienced steeper growth in their incidence rates in recent years. Hormonal factors were hypothesized to be playing a role in modulating NMSC risk, but the studies published to date provided conflicting results. We systematically reviewed and meta-analysed the studies focusing on the association between hormone-related characteristics (use of exogenous sex hormones, and aspects of menstrual and reproductive history) and the risk of NMSC among women. We included observational and experimental studies published in PubMed and EMBASE until February 2020. We calculated summary relative risk (SRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) by applying random effects models with maximum likelihood estimation, and used the I statistics to quantify the degree of heterogeneity of risk estimates across studies. Eleven independent studies encompassing a total of over 30,000 NMSC cases were included in quantitative analyses. No evidence of an increased NMSC risk emerged among ever vs. never users of oral contraceptives (SRR 1.13, 95% CI 0.88-1.45) or hormones for menopause (SRR 1.09, 95% CI 0.87-1.37). Likewise, age at menarche or at menopause and parity were not associated with NMSC risk. Heterogeneity across studies was low, and pooled results were comparable between NMSC subtypes. We found no evidence that hormonal factors play a role in the pathogenesis of NMSC among women.
非黑色素瘤皮肤癌(NMSC)在男性中更为常见,但近年来,女性(尤其是年龄<40 岁的女性)的发病率增长更为迅猛。有假说认为激素因素在调节 NMSC 风险方面发挥作用,但迄今为止发表的研究结果相互矛盾。我们系统性地回顾和荟萃分析了聚焦于激素相关特征(使用外源性性激素以及月经和生殖史方面)与女性 NMSC 风险之间关联的研究。我们纳入了截至 2020 年 2 月在 PubMed 和 EMBASE 上发表的观察性和实验性研究。我们应用最大似然估计的随机效应模型计算了汇总相对风险(SRR)和 95%置信区间(CI),并使用 I 统计量来量化研究间风险估计值的异质性程度。11 项独立的研究共纳入了超过 30000 例 NMSC 病例,用于定量分析。从未使用过口服避孕药或激素替代疗法的女性与持续使用者相比,NMSC 风险未见增加(SRR 1.13,95%CI 0.88-1.45)或激素替代疗法的女性(SRR 1.09,95%CI 0.87-1.37)。同样,初潮年龄或绝经年龄和生育次数与 NMSC 风险无关。研究间的异质性较低,且 NMSC 亚型的汇总结果具有可比性。我们未发现证据表明激素因素在女性 NMSC 的发病机制中发挥作用。