Suppr超能文献

《幸福感问卷:心理测量特性、人口统计学比较及效度证据》

The Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being: Psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity.

作者信息

Waterman Alan S, Schwartz Seth J, Zamboanga Byron L, Ravert Russell D, Williams Michelle K, Agocha V Bede, Kim Su Yeong, Donnellan M Brent

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, USA.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Family Studies, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, USA.

出版信息

J Posit Psychol. 2010;5(1):41-61. doi: 10.1080/17439760903435208. Epub 2010 Jan 28.

Abstract

The Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being (QEWB) was developed to measure well-being in a manner consistent with how it is conceptualized in eudaimonist philosophy. Aspects of eudaimonic well-being assessed by the QEWB include self-discovery, perceived development of one's best potentials, a sense of purpose and meaning in life, intense involvement in activities, investment of significant effort, and enjoyment of activities as personally expressive. The QEWB was administered to two large, ethnically diverse samples of college students drawn from multiple sites across the United States. A three-part evaluation of the instrument was conducted: (1) evaluating psychometric properties, (2) comparing QEWB scores across gender, age, ethnicity, family income, and family structure, and (3) assessing the convergent, discriminant, construct, and incremental validity of the QEWB. Six hypotheses relating QEWB scores to identity formation, personality traits, and positive and negative psychological functioning were evaluated. The internal consistency of the scale was high and results of independent CFAs indicated that the QEWB items patterned onto a common factor. The distribution of scores approximated a normal curve. Demographic variables were found to predict only small proportions of QEWB score variability. Support for the hypotheses tested provides evidence for the validity of the QEWB as an instrument for assessing eudaimonic well-being. Implications for theory and future research directions are discussed.

摘要

幸福安康问卷(QEWB)的开发旨在以一种与幸福主义哲学中对幸福的概念化方式相一致的方式来衡量幸福感。QEWB所评估的幸福安康方面包括自我发现、对自身最佳潜能发展的感知、生活的目标感和意义感、对活动的强烈投入、大量精力的投入以及将活动视为个人表达的享受。QEWB被施用于从美国多个地点抽取的两个大型、种族多样的大学生样本。对该工具进行了三部分评估:(1)评估心理测量特性,(2)比较不同性别、年龄、种族、家庭收入和家庭结构的QEWB分数,以及(3)评估QEWB的聚合效度、区分效度、结构效度和增量效度。评估了六个将QEWB分数与身份形成、人格特质以及积极和消极心理功能相关联的假设。该量表的内部一致性较高,独立验证性因素分析的结果表明QEWB项目构成了一个共同因素。分数分布近似正态曲线。发现人口统计学变量仅能预测QEWB分数变异性的一小部分。对所测试假设的支持为QEWB作为评估幸福安康的工具的有效性提供了证据。讨论了对理论和未来研究方向的启示。

相似文献

1
The Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being: Psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity.
J Posit Psychol. 2010;5(1):41-61. doi: 10.1080/17439760903435208. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
2
Further Investigation of the Dimensionality of the Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being.
Front Psychol. 2022 May 6;13:795770. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.795770. eCollection 2022.
5
Japanese version of the 42-item psychological well-being scale (PWBS-42): a validation study.
BMC Psychol. 2020 Jul 20;8(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-00441-1.
8
[Psychometric properties of the French version of the How I Think Questionnaire].
Encephale. 2013 Dec;39(6):401-7. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.10.013. Epub 2013 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
3
4
Sex, Resilience and Psychological Well-Being in Mexican University Students.
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025 Mar 10;15(3):32. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15030032.
5
"That's me at my best": perspectives of older adults on involvement in technology research.
Med Humanit. 2025 Jan 2;50(4):648-656. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2024-013030.
6
Understanding the well-being of residents in Chinese Continuing Care Retirement Communities-a case of Shanghai.
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 4;12:1457022. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1457022. eCollection 2024.
8
Emotional regulation and Arnold's self-ideal: a way to flourishment.
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 14;15:1425850. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1425850. eCollection 2024.
9
Does the good life feel good? The role of positive emotion in competing conceptions of the good life.
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 7;15:1425415. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1425415. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

2
The role of positive and negative emotions in life satisfaction judgment across nations.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jul;95(1):66-75. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.66.
4
Structural equation modeling: strengths, limitations, and misconceptions.
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:31-65. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144239.
5
Predictors of subjective well-being among college youth in Lebanon.
J Soc Psychol. 2007 Jun;147(3):265-84. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.147.3.265-284.
7
The mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality.
Psychol Assess. 2006 Jun;18(2):192-203. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192.
8
Beyond the hedonic treadmill: revising the adaptation theory of well-being.
Am Psychol. 2006 May-Jun;61(4):305-14. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.305.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验