Faculty of Behavioural, Management & Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, University of Twente, Postbus 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Optentia Research Focus Area, North-West University, Hendrik Van Eck Blvd, Vanderbijlpark, 1900, South Africa.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jun 2;18(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01416-x.
Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the positive psychology intervention 'Happiness Route' compared to an active control condition in a vulnerable population with an accumulation of health and psychosocial problems.
We conducted a randomized, single-blind, actively-controlled, parallel group study in seven municipalities in the Netherlands. To be eligible, participants had to experience loneliness, health problems and low socio-economic status. Each group received several home visits by a counsellor (two in the control condition, two to six in the experimental condition). In the Happiness Route, a happiness-based approach was used, whereas the control condition used a traditional problem-based approach. The primary outcome was well-being, measured with the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF).
Fifty-eight participants were randomized to the Happiness Route, 50 to the control condition. Participants were severely lonely, had on average three health problems and less than 5% had paid work. The total MHC-SF score, emotional and social well-being, depression and loneliness improved significantly over the nine-month period in both conditions (p < .05), but there were no significant changes between the conditions across time. Languishing decreased significantly from 33% at baseline to 16% at follow-up among the Happiness Route participants but did not change significantly in the control condition. No significant improvement over time was found in psychological well-being, resilience, purpose in life, health-related quality of life and social participation. Cost-effectiveness analysis showed that expected saved costs per QALY lost was €219,948 for the Happiness Route, relative to the control condition. The probability was 83% that the Happiness Route was cost saving and 54% that the Happiness Route was cost-effective at a willingness to accept a threshold of €100,000.
Mental health status of both groups improved considerably. However, we could not demonstrate that the Happiness Route yielded better health outcomes compared to the control condition. Nevertheless, the results of the cost-effectiveness analysis suggested that the Happiness Route is an acceptable intervention from a health-economic point of view. Our results should be viewed in light of the fact that we could not include the planned number of participants.
Netherlands Trial Register: NTR3377. Registered 2 Apr 2012.
本研究旨在评估积极心理学干预“幸福路径”相较于活跃对照组在一个有健康和社会心理问题累积的脆弱人群中的有效性和成本效益。
我们在荷兰的七个城市进行了一项随机、单盲、积极对照、平行组研究。参与者必须经历孤独、健康问题和低社会经济地位才有资格参与。每个组都接受了几次由顾问进行的家访(对照组两次,实验组 2 到 6 次)。在幸福路径中,采用了基于幸福感的方法,而对照组则采用了传统的基于问题的方法。主要结果是使用心理健康连续体-短式量表(MHC-SF)测量的幸福感。
58 名参与者被随机分配到幸福路径组,50 名参与者被分配到对照组。参与者非常孤独,平均有 3 种健康问题,不到 5%的人有带薪工作。在九个月的时间里,两组的 MHC-SF 总分、情绪和社会幸福感、抑郁和孤独感都显著改善(p<0.05),但两组之间的变化没有统计学意义。幸福路径组的萎靡状态从基线的 33%显著下降到随访时的 16%,而对照组没有显著变化。随着时间的推移,心理幸福感、韧性、生活目的、健康相关生活质量和社会参与度均未发现显著改善。成本效益分析显示,与对照组相比,幸福路径的预期节省成本为每 QALY 损失 219948 欧元。幸福路径具有成本效益的概率为 54%,在接受阈值为 100000 欧元时,幸福路径节省成本的概率为 83%。
两组的心理健康状况都有了显著改善。然而,我们无法证明幸福路径比对照组能带来更好的健康结果。尽管如此,成本效益分析的结果表明,从健康经济学的角度来看,幸福路径是一种可接受的干预措施。我们的研究结果应该考虑到我们无法纳入计划数量的参与者这一事实。
荷兰试验注册处:NTR3377。注册于 2012 年 4 月 2 日。