• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检测下肢动脉疾病患者无症状性颈动脉狭窄:风险评分的制定和外部验证。

Detection of asymptomatic carotid stenosis in patients with lower-extremity arterial disease: development and external validations of a risk score.

机构信息

Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2021 Aug 19;108(8):960-967. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab040.

DOI:10.1093/bjs/znab040
PMID:33876207
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10364916/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recommendations for screening patients with lower-extremity arterial disease (LEAD) to detect asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) are conflicting. Prediction models might identify patients at high risk of ACS, possibly allowing targeted screening to improve preventive therapy and compliance.

METHODS

A systematic search for prediction models for at least 50 per cent ACS in patients with LEAD was conducted. A prediction model in screened patients from the USA with an ankle : brachial pressure index of 0.9 or less was subsequently developed, and assessed for discrimination and calibration. External validation was performed in two independent cohorts, from the UK and the Netherlands.

RESULTS

After screening 4907 studies, no previously published prediction models were found. For development of a new model, data for 112 117 patients were used, of whom 6354 (5.7 per cent) had at least 50 per cent ACS and 2801 (2.5 per cent) had at least 70 per cent ACS. Age, sex, smoking status, history of hypercholesterolaemia, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, coronary heart disease and measured systolic BP were predictors of ACS. The model discrimination had an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of 0.71 (95 per cent c.i. 0.71 to 0.72) for at least 50 per cent ACS and 0.73 (0.72 to 0.73) for at least 70 per cent ACS. Screening the 20 per cent of patients at greatest risk detected 12.4 per cent with at least 50 per cent ACS (number needed to screen (NNS) 8] and 5.8 per cent with at least 70 per cent ACS (NNS 17). This yielded 44.2 and 46.9 per cent of patients with at least 50 and 70 per cent ACS respectively. External validation showed reliable discrimination and adequate calibration.

CONCLUSION

The present risk score can predict significant ACS in patients with LEAD. This approach may inform targeted screening of high-risk individuals to enhance the detection of ACS.

摘要

背景

下肢动脉疾病(LEAD)患者无症状颈动脉狭窄(ACS)筛查的推荐意见存在冲突。预测模型可能会识别出 ACS 高危患者,从而可能通过针对性筛查来改善预防性治疗和依从性。

方法

系统检索了至少 50%的 LEAD 患者 ACS 的预测模型。随后,从美国接受踝臂血压指数(ABI)检测为 0.9 或更低的筛查患者中开发并评估了预测模型的区分度和校准度。在来自英国和荷兰的两个独立队列中进行了外部验证。

结果

经过筛选 4907 项研究,未发现先前发表的预测模型。为了开发新模型,使用了 112117 名患者的数据,其中 6354 名(5.7%)患者至少有 50%的 ACS,2801 名(2.5%)患者至少有 70%的 ACS。年龄、性别、吸烟状况、高胆固醇血症史、卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作、冠心病和测量的收缩压是 ACS 的预测因素。该模型的区分度在接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUROC)为 0.71(95%可信区间 0.71 至 0.72),用于预测至少 50%的 ACS,0.73(0.72 至 0.73)用于预测至少 70%的 ACS。对风险最高的 20%患者进行筛查,可检出至少 50%ACS 的患者占 12.4%(所需筛查人数(NNS)为 8),检出至少 70%ACS 的患者占 5.8%(NNS 为 17)。这分别使至少 50%和 70%ACS 的患者比例达到 44.2%和 46.9%。外部验证显示了可靠的区分度和适当的校准度。

结论

目前的风险评分可以预测 LEAD 患者的 ACS。这种方法可能有助于对高危人群进行有针对性的筛查,以提高 ACS 的检出率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e2f/10364916/38fde7314a05/znab040f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e2f/10364916/64c69500b2f5/znab040f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e2f/10364916/38fde7314a05/znab040f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e2f/10364916/64c69500b2f5/znab040f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e2f/10364916/38fde7314a05/znab040f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Detection of asymptomatic carotid stenosis in patients with lower-extremity arterial disease: development and external validations of a risk score.检测下肢动脉疾病患者无症状性颈动脉狭窄:风险评分的制定和外部验证。
Br J Surg. 2021 Aug 19;108(8):960-967. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab040.
2
Development and Internal Validation of a Risk Score to Detect Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.无症状性颈动脉狭窄风险评分的制定与内部验证。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Mar;61(3):365-373. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.11.029. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
3
Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Detect Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.验证用于检测无症状颈动脉狭窄的风险预测模型。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Apr 21;9(8):e014766. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014766. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
4
Risk factors associated with increased prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in women.与女性腹主动脉瘤患病率升高相关的风险因素。
Br J Surg. 2016 Aug;103(9):1132-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10179. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
5
Rationale for screening selected patients for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.无症状颈动脉狭窄患者筛查的理由。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Mar;36(3):361-365. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1713075. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
6
Prediction of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in the general population: identification of high-risk groups.一般人群无症状颈动脉狭窄的预测:高危人群的识别。
Stroke. 2014 Aug;45(8):2366-71. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005145. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
7
Contemporary prevalence of carotid stenosis in patients presenting with ischaemic stroke.当代缺血性脑卒中患者颈动脉狭窄的流行情况。
Br J Surg. 2019 Jun;106(7):872-878. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11136. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
8
Detection of Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis in High-Risk Individuals of Stroke Using a Machine-Learning Algorithm.使用机器学习算法检测脑卒中高危人群的无症状颈动脉狭窄。
Chin Med Sci J. 2020 Dec 31;35(4):297-305. doi: 10.24920/003703.
9
Stroke prevention in asymptomatic carotid artery disease: revascularization of carotid stenosis is not the solution.无症状性颈动脉疾病的卒中预防:颈动脉狭窄的血管重建并非解决之道。
Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2015;125(5):363-9. doi: 10.20452/pamw.2838. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
10
Risk of Stroke and Cardiac Events in Medically Treated Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.药物治疗无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者的中风和心脏事件风险
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015 Sep;24(9):2149-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.05.030. Epub 2015 Jul 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Age-Related Anatomical Changes in Carotid Artery Stenosis and Its Impact on Postoperative Complications in Stenting and Endarterectomy.颈动脉狭窄的年龄相关解剖学变化及其对支架置入术和动脉内膜切除术术后并发症的影响。
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2025 Jul;31(7):e70527. doi: 10.1111/cns.70527.
2
Diagnosis models to predict peripheral arterial disease: a systematic review and meta analysis.预测外周动脉疾病的诊断模型:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 22;15(1):26661. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10459-3.
3
Predicting internal carotid artery system risk based on common carotid artery by machine learning.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk of stroke in relation to degree of asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a population-based cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis.无症状性颈动脉狭窄程度与卒中风险的关系:基于人群的队列研究、系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Mar;20(3):193-202. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30484-1.
2
Development and Internal Validation of a Risk Score to Detect Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.无症状性颈动脉狭窄风险评分的制定与内部验证。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Mar;61(3):365-373. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.11.029. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
3
Ticagrelor Added to Aspirin in Acute Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack in Prevention of Disabling Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
基于机器学习通过颈总动脉预测颈内动脉系统风险
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2025 Jul 14. doi: 10.1007/s11517-025-03413-y.
4
Prediction of Severe Baseline Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis and Subsequent Risk of Stroke and Cardiovascular Disease.预测严重的无症状颈动脉狭窄及随后的卒中与心血管疾病风险。
Stroke. 2024 Nov;55(11):2632-2640. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.046894. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
5
Associations of Increased Red Cell Distribution Width Levels with the Severity of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Cross-sectional Study Results.红细胞分布宽度水平升高与颈动脉狭窄严重程度的相关性:横断面研究结果
J Med Ultrasound. 2024 May 29;32(2):148-153. doi: 10.4103/jmu.jmu_46_23. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
6
Evaluation of Short-Term Insulin Pump for Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Complicated with Lower Extremity Arterial Disease in Endocrinology by Ultrasonography.超声检查在评价短期胰岛素泵治疗内分泌科 2 型糖尿病合并下肢动脉病变患者中的应用。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 May 27;2022:9128208. doi: 10.1155/2022/9128208. eCollection 2022.
替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林用于急性缺血性卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作预防致残性卒中:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Nov 7;78(2):1-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4396.
4
Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Detect Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.验证用于检测无症状颈动脉狭窄的风险预测模型。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Apr 21;9(8):e014766. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014766. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
5
Umbrella review and meta-analysis of antiplatelet therapy for peripheral artery disease.抗血小板治疗外周动脉疾病的伞状评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2020 Jan;107(1):20-32. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11384. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
6
Can risk modelling improve treatment decisions in asymptomatic carotid stenosis?无症状性颈动脉狭窄的治疗决策能否通过风险建模得到改善?
BMC Neurol. 2019 Nov 22;19(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1528-7.
7
Observational study of the medical management of patients with peripheral artery disease.观察性研究外周动脉疾病患者的医学管理。
Br J Surg. 2019 Aug;106(9):1168-1177. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11214. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
8
Five Year Outcomes in Men Screened for Carotid Artery Stenosis at 65 Years of Age: A Population Based Cohort Study.65 岁男性进行颈动脉狭窄筛查的 5 年结局:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Jun;57(6):759-766. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 May 26.
9
Editor's Choice - Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS).编辑推荐——动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉和椎动脉疾病的管理:欧洲血管外科学会(ESVS)2017年临床实践指南
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Jan;55(1):3-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.06.021. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
10
Rivaroxaban with or without Aspirin in Stable Cardiovascular Disease.利伐沙班联合或不联合阿司匹林用于稳定型心血管疾病。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 5;377(14):1319-1330. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709118. Epub 2017 Aug 27.