Suppr超能文献

DECT 检测与椎体骨折相关的骨髓水肿:系统评价和荟萃分析,重点关注技术和成像解释参数。

DECT in Detection of Vertebral Fracture-associated Bone Marrow Edema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Emphasis on Technical and Imaging Interpretation Parameters.

机构信息

From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, 601 N Caroline St, JHOC 5165, Baltimore, MD 21287 (F.G.S., H.I.S., S.D.); Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (D.S., M.H.J.); Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (J.F.); and Department of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany (B.J.S.).

出版信息

Radiology. 2021 Jul;300(1):110-119. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021203624. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

Abstract

Background Dual-energy CT (DECT) shows promising performance in detecting bone marrow edema (BME) associated with vertebral body fractures. However, the optimal technical and image interpretation parameters are not well described. Purpose To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the diagnostic performance of DECT in detecting BME associated with vertebral fractures (VFs), using different technical and image interpretation parameters, compared with MRI as the reference standard. Materials and Methods A systematic literature search was performed on July 9, 2020, to identify studies evaluating DECT performance for in vivo detection of vertebral BME. A random-effects model was used to derive estimates of the diagnostic accuracy parameters of DECT. The impact of relevant covariates in technical, image interpretation, and study design parameters on the diagnostic performance of DECT was investigated using subgroup analyses. Results Seventeen studies (with 742 of 2468 vertebrae with BME at MRI) met inclusion criteria. Pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of DECT for vertebral body BME were 89% (95% CI: 84%, 92%), 96% (95% CI: 92%, 98%), and 96% (95% CI: 94%, 97%), respectively. Single-source consecutive scanning showed poor specificity (78%) compared with the dual-source technique (98%, < .001). Specificity was higher using bone and soft-tissue kernels (98%) compared with using only soft-tissue kernels (90%, = .001). Qualitative assessment had a better specificity (97%) versus quantitative assessment (90%) of DECT images ( = .01). Experienced readers showed considerably higher specificity (96%) compared with trainees (79%, = .01). DECT sensitivity improved using a higher difference between low- and high-energy spectra (90% vs 83%, = .04). Conclusion Given its high specificity, the detection of vertebral bone marrow edema with dual-energy CT (DECT) associated with vertebral fracture may obviate confirmatory MRI in an emergency setting. Technical parameters, such as the dual-source technique, both bone and soft-tissue kernels, and qualitative assessment by experienced readers, can ensure the high specificity of DECT. © RSNA, 2021

摘要

背景 双能 CT(DECT)在检测与椎体骨折相关的骨髓水肿(BME)方面表现出良好的性能。然而,其最佳技术和图像解读参数尚未得到充分描述。目的 旨在通过系统综述和荟萃分析,确定不同技术和图像解读参数下 DECT 检测与椎体骨折相关的骨髓水肿(BME)的诊断性能,以 MRI 作为参考标准。材料与方法 于 2020 年 7 月 9 日进行了系统文献检索,以确定评估 DECT 活体检测椎体 BME 性能的研究。使用随机效应模型得出 DECT 诊断准确性参数的估计值。使用亚组分析调查技术、图像解读和研究设计参数中的相关协变量对 DECT 诊断性能的影响。结果 17 项研究(共 742 个 MRI 显示 BME 的椎体)符合纳入标准。DECT 检测椎体骨髓水肿的敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积的汇总估计值分别为 89%(95%CI:84%,92%)、96%(95%CI:92%,98%)和 96%(95%CI:94%,97%)。与双源技术(98%,<.001)相比,单源连续扫描的特异性较差(78%)。与仅使用软组织核(90%,=.001)相比,使用骨和软组织核的特异性更高(98%)。与 DECT 图像的定量评估(90%)相比,定性评估的特异性更高(97%)(=.01)。与新手相比,经验丰富的读者的特异性(96%)明显更高(=.01)。使用低能谱与高能谱之间的差值较大时,DECT 的敏感性提高(90%比 83%,=.04)。结论 在具有较高特异性的情况下,与椎体骨折相关的椎体骨髓水肿的双能 CT(DECT)检测可能在急诊情况下不需要进行确认性 MRI。技术参数,如双源技术、骨和软组织核以及经验丰富的读者进行的定性评估,可以确保 DECT 的高特异性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验