Department of Renal Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore.
BMC Nephrol. 2021 Apr 20;22(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12882-021-02357-3.
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection has been associated with a hypercoagulable state with increased reports of thrombotic events. Acute kidney injury requiring dialysis is common in critically ill patients and circuit clotting compromises efficacy of treatment. This study aims to analyze the circuit life and circuit clotting during continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) and intermittent hemodialysis in patients with and without COVID-19.
This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study in critically ill patients undergoing CKRT or intermittent hemodialysis between 1 February 2020 to 22 May 2020. Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) with COVID-19 infection and contemporary controls who tested negative were included. Co-primary outcomes were functional circuit life for patients on CKRT and all circuit clotting events for patients on CKRT and/or intermittent hemodialysis.
Seventy CKRT circuits and 32 intermittent hemodialysis sessions for 12 COVID-19 cases and 22 CKRT circuits and 18 intermittent hemodialysis sessions for 15 controls were analyzed. CKRT circuit clotting was more common in the COVID-19 group compared to the control group (64% vs 36%, p = 0.02), despite higher anticoagulation use in the COVID-19 group (41% vs 14%, p = 0.02). Functional CKRT circuit life was similar in COVID-19 patients and controls (median 11 vs 12 h, p = 0.69). On Cox regression analysis, circuit clotting was similar with hazard ratio (HR) 1.90 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89-4.04]; however, clotting was increased in COVID-19 patients after adjustment for anticoagulation use (HR: 3.31 [95% CI 1.49-7.33]). In patients with COVID-19, CKRT circuits with anticoagulation had a longer circuit life compared to CKRT circuits without anticoagulation (median 22 versus 7 h respectively, p < 0.001). Circuit clotting was similar in both groups undergoing intermittent hemodialysis.
Dialysis clotting amongst COVID-19 patients is increased despite more anticoagulation use and the hazard for clotting is greater especially after adjusting for anticoagulation use. Circuit life was suboptimal in COVID-19 patients on circuits without anticoagulation and therefore routine use of anticoagulation amongst COVID-19 patients should be considered whenever possible.
新冠肺炎(COVID-19)感染与高凝状态相关,血栓事件的报告增多。需要透析的急性肾损伤在危重症患者中很常见,且透析回路凝血会影响治疗效果。本研究旨在分析 COVID-19 患者与非 COVID-19 患者行连续性肾脏替代治疗(CKRT)和间歇性血液透析时的回路寿命和回路凝血情况。
这是一项单中心、回顾性队列研究,纳入 2020 年 2 月 1 日至 2020 年 5 月 22 日期间在重症监护病房(ICU)行 CKRT 或间歇性血液透析的危重症患者。包括 ICU 中 COVID-19 感染患者和经检测为阴性的同期对照患者。主要结局为 COVID-19 患者行 CKRT 的功能性回路寿命和 CKRT 及/或间歇性血液透析患者的所有回路凝血事件。
分析了 12 例 COVID-19 患者的 70 个 CKRT 回路和 32 次间歇性血液透析治疗,以及 15 例对照患者的 22 个 CKRT 回路和 18 次间歇性血液透析治疗。与对照组(36%)相比,COVID-19 组的 CKRT 回路凝血更常见(64%,p=0.02),尽管 COVID-19 组抗凝使用率更高(41% vs 14%,p=0.02)。COVID-19 患者与对照组的功能性 CKRT 回路寿命相似(中位数分别为 11 小时和 12 小时,p=0.69)。在 Cox 回归分析中,调整抗凝使用后,回路凝血的风险比(HR)为 3.31(95%置信区间[CI]:1.49-7.33),但 COVID-19 患者的凝血风险更高(HR:1.90 [95%CI:0.89-4.04])。COVID-19 患者使用抗凝剂的 CKRT 回路寿命长于未使用抗凝剂的 CKRT 回路(中位数分别为 22 小时和 7 小时,p<0.001)。两组行间歇性血液透析的患者的回路凝血情况相似。
尽管 COVID-19 患者抗凝使用率更高,但仍存在更多的透析回路凝血情况,且在调整抗凝使用后,其凝血风险更高。COVID-19 患者在未使用抗凝剂的情况下,其回路寿命不理想,因此只要可能,应考虑在 COVID-19 患者中常规使用抗凝剂。