The Ohio State University, USA.
J Child Lang. 2022 Mar;49(2):366-381. doi: 10.1017/S0305000921000180. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
Grammatical morphology often links small acoustic forms to abstract semantic domains. Deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) children have reduced access to the acoustic signal and frequently have delayed acquisition of grammatical morphology (e.g., Tomblin, Harrison, Ambrose, Walker, Oleson & Moeller, 2015). This study investigated the naturalistic use of aspectual morphology in DHH children to determine if they organize this semantic domain as normal hearing (NH) children have been found to do. Thirty DHH children (M = 6;8) and 29 NH children (M = 5;11) acquiring English participated in a free-play session and their tokens of perfective (simple past) and imperfective (-ing) morphology were coded for the lexical aspect of the predicate they marked. Both groups showed established prototype effects, favoring perfective + telic and imperfective + atelic pairings over perfective + atelic and perfective + atelic ones. Thus, despite reduced access to the acoustic signal, this DHH group was unimpaired for aspectual organization.
语法形态学通常将小的声学形式与抽象语义领域联系起来。聋人和重听(DHH)儿童对声学信号的接触较少,并且语法形态学的习得通常会延迟(例如,Tomblin、Harrison、Ambrose、Walker、Oleson 和 Moeller,2015)。本研究调查了 DHH 儿童在自然环境中使用体貌形态的情况,以确定他们是否像已发现的正常听力(NH)儿童那样组织这个语义领域。30 名 DHH 儿童(M=6;8)和 29 名 NH 儿童(M=5;11)参与了一个自由游戏环节,他们对完成体(简单过去时)和未完成体(-ing)形态的标记进行了编码,以表示谓语的词汇体。两组都表现出了既定的原型效应,倾向于使用完成体+终点和未完成体+非终点的搭配,而不是完成体+非终点和完成体+非终点的搭配。因此,尽管对声学信号的接触较少,但这个 DHH 群体在体貌组织方面没有受到影响。