• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术患者安全事件后对医疗保健专业人员的支持:5 所教学医院的定性描述性研究。

Support for Healthcare Professionals After Surgical Patient Safety Incidents: A Qualitative Descriptive Study in 5 Teaching Hospitals.

机构信息

From the School of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.

Department of Sociology, Durham University, Durham.

出版信息

J Patient Saf. 2021 Aug 1;17(5):335-340. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000844.

DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000000844
PMID:33881807
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Patient safety incidents can have a profound effect on healthcare professionals, with some experiencing emotional and psychological distress. This study explored the support medical and nonmedical operating room staff received after being involved in a surgical patient safety incident(s) in 5 UK teaching hospitals.

METHODS

An invitation letter and information sheet were e-mailed to all medical and nonmedical operating room staff (N = 927) across the 5 sites. Semistructured interviews were arranged with a range of different healthcare professionals working in operating rooms across a wide variety of surgical specialities. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using an inductive thematic approach.

RESULTS

We conducted 45 interviews with medical and nonmedical operating room staff, who emphasized the importance of receiving personalized support soon after the incident. Operating room staff described how the first "go to" people were their peers and reported feeling comforted when their peers empathized with their own experience(s). Other participants found it very difficult to seek support, perceiving it as a sign of weakness. Although family members played an important role in supporting second victims, some participants felt unable to discuss the incident with them, fearing that they might not understand.

CONCLUSIONS

There should be clear support structures in place for operating room staff who have been involved in surgical incidents. Health organizations need to offer timely support to frontline staff after these incidents. Senior clinicians should be proactive in offering support to junior colleagues and empathize with their own experiences, thus shifting the competitive culture to one of openness and support.

摘要

目的

患者安全事件会对医疗保健专业人员产生深远的影响,一些人会经历情绪和心理困扰。本研究探讨了在英国 5 家教学医院发生手术患者安全事件后,医疗和非医疗手术室工作人员所获得的支持。

方法

向 5 个地点的所有医疗和非医疗手术室工作人员(N=927)发送了一封邀请信和信息表。与来自各种外科专业的手术室的各种医疗保健专业人员安排了半结构化访谈。访谈进行了录音,逐字记录,并使用归纳主题方法进行了分析。

结果

我们对 45 名医疗和非医疗手术室工作人员进行了访谈,他们强调在事件发生后尽快获得个性化支持的重要性。手术室工作人员描述了他们的同行是他们的第一“求助”对象,当他们的同行对自己的经历表示同情时,他们感到安慰。其他参与者发现很难寻求支持,认为这是软弱的表现。尽管家属在支持第二受害者方面发挥了重要作用,但一些参与者觉得无法与他们讨论事件,担心他们可能不理解。

结论

应该为参与手术事件的手术室工作人员建立明确的支持结构。卫生组织需要在这些事件发生后及时为一线工作人员提供支持。高级临床医生应该主动为年轻同事提供支持,并同情他们自己的经历,从而将竞争文化转变为开放和支持的文化。

相似文献

1
Support for Healthcare Professionals After Surgical Patient Safety Incidents: A Qualitative Descriptive Study in 5 Teaching Hospitals.手术患者安全事件后对医疗保健专业人员的支持:5 所教学医院的定性描述性研究。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Aug 1;17(5):335-340. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000844.
2
Surgical incidents and their impact on operating theatre staff: qualitative study.手术事故及其对手术室工作人员的影响:定性研究。
BJS Open. 2021 Mar 5;5(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa007.
3
Experiences and responses of second victims of patient safety incidents in Korea: a qualitative study.韩国患者安全事件二次受害者的经历与反应:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb 6;19(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3936-1.
4
An exploration of patient safety culture in Kuwait hospitals: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' perspectives.科威特医院患者安全文化探索:医护人员观点的定性研究。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2020 Dec;28(6):617-625. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12574. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
5
Can incident reporting improve safety? Healthcare practitioners' views of the effectiveness of incident reporting.事件报告能否提高安全性?医疗保健从业者对事件报告有效性的看法。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2013 Apr;25(2):141-50. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs081. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
6
Informal risk assessment strategies in health care staff: an unrecognized source of resilience?医疗保健人员的非正式风险评估策略:一个未被认识到的韧性来源?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Dec;18(6):1140-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01759.x. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
7
Stress, anxiety, and erosion of trust: maternity staff experiences with incident management.压力、焦虑与信任的侵蚀:产科工作人员的事件管理体验
AJOG Glob Rep. 2022 Aug 11;2(4):100084. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100084. eCollection 2022 Nov.
8
Experience and support of Chinese healthcare professionals as second victims of patient safety incidents: A cross-sectional study.中国医护人员作为患者安全事件的第二受害者的经历和支持:一项横断面研究。
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2022 Apr;58(2):733-743. doi: 10.1111/ppc.12843. Epub 2021 May 16.
9
Medical Professionals' Responses to a Patient Safety Incident in Healthcare.医疗保健中患者安全事件的医疗专业人员的反应。
Int J Public Health. 2024 Jul 26;69:1607273. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607273. eCollection 2024.
10
Personal, situational and organizational aspects that influence the impact of patient safety incidents: A qualitative study.影响患者安全事件影响的个人、情境和组织因素:一项定性研究。
Rev Calid Asist. 2016 Jul;31 Suppl 2:34-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cali.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
How Were Patient Safety Incidents Responded to, Investigated, and Learned From Within the English National Health Service Before the Implementation of the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework? A Rapid Review.在《患者安全事件应对框架》实施之前,英国国家医疗服务体系是如何应对、调查和从中吸取教训的?一项快速综述。
J Patient Saf. 2025 Aug 1;21(5):e42-e55. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001349. Epub 2025 May 9.
2
Veterinary healthcare needs to talk more about error: For the wellbeing of our patients and medical teams.兽医保健需要更多地讨论错误:为了我们患者和医疗团队的健康。
J Vet Intern Med. 2022 Nov;36(6):2199-2202. doi: 10.1111/jvim.16554. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
3
"Don't Ask Me How I Know This…".
“别问我怎么知道这事的……”
J Grad Med Educ. 2022 Feb;14(1):10-12. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-21-00434.1.