• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Artificial intelligence-based cephalometric landmark annotation and measurements according to Arnett's analysis: can we trust a bot to do that?基于人工智能的头影测量标志点标注和阿内特分析法测量:我们能相信机器人能做到吗?
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2022 Sep 1;51(6):20200548. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20200548. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
2
Assessment of accuracy and reproducibility of cephalometric identification performed by 2 artificial intelligence-driven tracing applications and human examiners.评估由 2 种人工智能驱动的追踪应用程序和人类检查者进行的头影测量识别的准确性和可重复性。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2024 Apr;137(4):431-440. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2024.01.011. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
3
Assessment of landmark detection in cephalometric radiographs with different conditions of brightness and contrast using the an artificial intelligence software.使用人工智能软件评估不同亮度和对比度条件下头颅侧位片的标志点检测。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023 Nov;52(8):20230065. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20230065. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
4
Evaluation of the accuracy of fully automatic cephalometric analysis software with artificial intelligence algorithm.评价具有人工智能算法的全自动头影测量分析软件的准确性。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2023 Aug;26(3):481-490. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12633. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
5
Cephalometric analysis performance discrepancy between orthodontists and an artificial intelligence model using lateral cephalometric radiographs.头影测量分析使用侧位头颅 X 光片的正畸医生和人工智能模型之间的性能差异。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024 Apr;36(4):555-565. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13156. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
6
Evaluation of fully automated cephalometric measurements obtained from web-based artificial intelligence driven platform.基于网络的人工智能驱动平台获取的全自动头影测量评估。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Apr 19;22(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02170-w.
7
Reproducibility of linear and angular cephalometric measurements obtained by an artificial-intelligence assisted software (WebCeph) in comparison with digital software (AutoCEPH) and manual tracing method.人工智能辅助软件(WebCeph)与数字软件(AutoCEPH)和手动描迹方法获得的线性和角度头影测量的可重复性比较。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2023 Apr 3;28(1):e2321214. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.28.1.e2321214.oar. eCollection 2023.
8
Preciseness of artificial intelligence for lateral cephalometric measurements.人工智能在侧颅测量中的精确性。
J Orofac Orthop. 2024 May;85(Suppl 1):27-33. doi: 10.1007/s00056-023-00459-1. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
9
Comparison of semi and fully automated artificial intelligence driven softwares and manual system for cephalometric analysis.半自动和全自动人工智能驱动软件与手动系统在头影测量分析中的比较。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02664-3.
10
Accuracy and clinical validity of automated cephalometric analysis using convolutional neural networks.基于卷积神经网络的自动头影测量分析的准确性和临床有效性。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2024 Feb;27(1):64-77. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12683. Epub 2023 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Empowering Modern Dentistry: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Patient Care and Clinical Decision Making.赋能现代牙科:人工智能对患者护理和临床决策的影响。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jun 14;14(12):1260. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14121260.
2
Artificial Intelligence and Its Clinical Applications in Orthodontics: A Systematic Review.人工智能及其在正畸学中的临床应用:一项系统综述。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Dec 15;13(24):3677. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13243677.
3
Assessment of landmark detection in cephalometric radiographs with different conditions of brightness and contrast using the an artificial intelligence software.使用人工智能软件评估不同亮度和对比度条件下头颅侧位片的标志点检测。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023 Nov;52(8):20230065. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20230065. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
4
Human examination and artificial intelligence in cephalometric landmark detection-is AI ready to take over?颅面标志点检测中的人体检查与人工智能——人工智能是否已准备好接管?
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023 Sep;52(6):20220362. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20220362. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
5
Development, Application, and Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Cephalometric Landmark Identification and Diagnosis: A Systematic Review.人工智能在头影测量标志点识别与诊断中的发展、应用及性能:一项系统综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 5;10(12):2454. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122454.
6
Human Remains Identification Using Micro-CT, Chemometric and AI Methods in Forensic Experimental Reconstruction of Dental Patterns after Concentrated Sulphuric Acid Significant Impact.利用微 CT、化学计量学和人工智能方法在集中硫酸有重大影响的法医实验性牙齿模式重建中进行人类遗骸识别
Molecules. 2022 Jun 23;27(13):4035. doi: 10.3390/molecules27134035.
7
Evaluation of fully automated cephalometric measurements obtained from web-based artificial intelligence driven platform.基于网络的人工智能驱动平台获取的全自动头影测量评估。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Apr 19;22(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02170-w.
8
Use of Advanced Artificial Intelligence in Forensic Medicine, Forensic Anthropology and Clinical Anatomy.先进人工智能在法医学、法医人类学和临床解剖学中的应用。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Nov 12;9(11):1545. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9111545.

本文引用的文献

1
Web-based Fully Automated Cephalometric Analysis: Comparisons between App-aided, Computerized, and Manual Tracings.基于网络的全自动头影测量分析:应用程序辅助、计算机化和手工描记之间的比较。
Turk J Orthod. 2020 Aug 11;33(3):142-149. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.20062. eCollection 2020 Sep.
2
The use and performance of artificial intelligence applications in dental and maxillofacial radiology: A systematic review.人工智能应用在口腔颌面放射学中的使用和性能:系统评价。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020 Jan;49(1):20190107. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20190107. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
3
Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks:自动识别头影测量标志点:
Angle Orthod. 2020 Jan;90(1):69-76. doi: 10.2319/022019-129.1. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
4
Reliability of different three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam computed tomography : A systematic review.不同三维头影测量标志点在锥形束 CT 中的可靠性:系统评价。
Angle Orthod. 2019 Mar;89(2):317-332. doi: 10.2319/042018-302.1. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
5
Automatic 3-dimensional cephalometric landmarking based on active shape models in related projections.基于相关投影中活动形状模型的自动三维头影测量地标定位。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Mar;153(3):449-458. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.06.028.
6
Machine Learning Will Change Medicine.机器学习将改变医学。
J Nucl Med. 2017 Mar;58(3):357-358. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.190397. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
7
Cephalometric landmark variability among orthodontists and dentomaxillofacial radiologists: a comparative study.正畸医生与口腔颌面放射科医生之间头影测量标志点的变异性:一项对比研究。
Imaging Sci Dent. 2015 Dec;45(4):213-20. doi: 10.5624/isd.2015.45.4.213. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
8
Reproducibility of measurements in tablet-assisted, PC-aided, and manual cephalometric analysis.片剂辅助、计算机辅助和手工头影测量分析中测量结果的可重复性。
Angle Orthod. 2014 May;84(3):437-42. doi: 10.2319/061513-451.1. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
9
Accuracy of computerized automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks by a designed software.设计软件用于计算机自动识别头影测量标志点的准确性。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(1):20110187. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20110187.
10
An evaluation of cellular neural networks for the automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks on digital images.用于在数字图像上自动识别头影测量标志点的细胞神经网络评估。
J Biomed Biotechnol. 2009;2009:717102. doi: 10.1155/2009/717102. Epub 2009 Sep 10.

基于人工智能的头影测量标志点标注和阿内特分析法测量:我们能相信机器人能做到吗?

Artificial intelligence-based cephalometric landmark annotation and measurements according to Arnett's analysis: can we trust a bot to do that?

机构信息

Departament of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brasil.

Department of Dentistry, Undergraduate student of Dentistry, Federal University of Sergipe, Sergipe, Brazil.

出版信息

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2022 Sep 1;51(6):20200548. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20200548. Epub 2022 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1259/dmfr.20200548
PMID:33882247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10043619/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the reliability of CEFBOT, an artificial intelligence (AI)-based cephalometry software, for cephalometric landmark annotation and linear and angular measurements according to Arnett's analysis.

METHODS

Thirty lateral cephalometric radiographs acquired with a Carestream CS 9000 3D unit (Carestream Health Inc., Rochester/NY) were used in this study. The 66 landmarks and the 10 selected linear and angular measurements of Arnett's analysis were identified on each radiograph by a trained human examiner (control) and by CEFBOT (RadioMemory Ltd., Belo Horizonte, Brazil). For both methods, landmark annotations and measurements were duplicated with an interval of 15 days between measurements and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to determine reliability. The numerical values obtained with the two methods were compared by a -test for independent variables.

RESULTS

CEFBOT was able to perform all but one of the 10 measurements. ICC values > 0.94 were found for the remaining eight measurements, while the Frankfurt horizontal plane - true horizontal line (THL) angular measurement showed the lowest reproducibility (human, ICC = 0.876; CEFBOT, ICC = 0.768). Measurements performed by the human examiner and by CEFBOT were not statistically different.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of our methodology, we concluded that the AI contained in the CEFBOT software can be considered a promising tool for enhancing the capacities of human radiologists.

摘要

目的

评估 CEFBOT,一种基于人工智能(AI)的头影测量软件,在根据 Arnett 分析进行头影测量标志点标注和线性及角度测量方面的可靠性。

方法

本研究使用了 30 张由 Carestream CS 9000 3D 设备(Carestream Health Inc.,罗彻斯特/纽约)获取的侧位头颅 X 光片。每张 X 光片均由经过培训的人类检查者(对照组)和 CEFBOT(巴西贝洛哈里桑塔的 RadioMemory Ltd.)识别 66 个标志点和 Arnett 分析的 10 个选定的线性和角度测量值。对于这两种方法,标志点标注和测量值在测量之间间隔 15 天进行重复,并计算组内相关系数(ICC)以确定可靠性。通过独立变量的 t 检验比较两种方法获得的数值。

结果

CEFBOT 能够进行除一项测量外的所有 10 项测量。其余 8 项测量的 ICC 值>0.94,而法兰克福水平面-真水平线(THL)角度测量的可重复性最低(人类,ICC=0.876;CEFBOT,ICC=0.768)。人类检查者和 CEFBOT 进行的测量在统计学上没有差异。

结论

在我们的方法学限制内,我们得出结论,CEFBOT 软件中包含的人工智能可以被视为增强人类放射科医生能力的有前途的工具。