Department of Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University.
Department of Operative Dentistry, Division of Oral Functional Science and Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Asahi University.
Dent Mater J. 2021 Sep 30;40(5):1073-1079. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2020-362. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
This study aimed to evaluate the bonding abilities and long-term durability of different repair agents when applied to lithium disilicate ceramics (LDS). Blocks of IPS e.max CAD were prepared and divided into four groups according to the surface treatment: Monobond Etch & Prime (ME), K-etchant GEL+Clearfil Universal Bond (UB), Bondmer Lightless (BL), and K-etchant GEL+G-Multi Primer (GMP). All treated ceramic specimens were bonded to resin composite and light-cured. The micro-shear bond strength was measured after 24 h of water storage or 5,000 thermocycles. ME and BL showed significantly higher initial bond strengths than UB and GMP (p<0.05). After 5,000 thermocycles, there was no significant difference in ME (p>0.05), but BL and GMP showed considerable reduction in bond strength (p<0.05); moreover, the samples of UB were all de-bonded before testing. ME and BL proved to be effective surface treatment materials for LDS.
本研究旨在评估不同修复剂在应用于锂硅二酸盐陶瓷(LDS)时的粘结性能和长期耐久性。制备 IPS e.max CAD 块,并根据表面处理分为四组:Monobond Etch & Prime(ME)、K-etchant GEL+Clearfil Universal Bond(UB)、Bondmer Lightless(BL)和 K-etchant GEL+G-Multi Primer(GMP)。所有处理过的陶瓷标本均与树脂复合材料粘结并光固化。在水储存 24 小时或 5000 次热循环后测量微剪切粘结强度。ME 和 BL 显示出明显高于 UB 和 GMP 的初始粘结强度(p<0.05)。经过 5000 次热循环后,ME 没有明显差异(p>0.05),但 BL 和 GMP 的粘结强度显著降低(p<0.05);此外,UB 的样本在测试前均已脱粘。ME 和 BL 被证明是 LDS 的有效表面处理材料。