• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗益处与风险的患者观点:一项定性研究

Patient Perspectives on the Benefits and Risks of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Qualitative Study.

作者信息

Ingle M Pilar, Lammons William, Guigli Rebecca, Kini Vinay, Matlock Daniel D, Brereton Elinor, Scherer Laura D

机构信息

Graduate School of Social Work, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA.

Section of Neonatal Medicine, Division of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Apr 12;15:721-728. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S302146. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.2147/PPA.S302146
PMID:33883883
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8055246/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Growing evidence for coronary stents in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) suggests that the benefits of stents are uncertain. The goal of this study was to assess patients' informational needs and how patients react to information about the uncertain benefit of stents to CAD patients.

METHODS

Semi-structured qualitative interviews (N=20) were conducted with patients with stable CAD who received a recent stent. Data were coded and analyzed using a mixed inductive-deductive approach.

RESULTS

Some patients mistakenly believed that the purpose of their stent was to prevent a future heart attack, and few were previously aware of the uncertain benefit. Nearly all patients perceived positive outcomes from their procedure, even if their symptoms persisted. Some patients had difficulty accepting evidence that stents may not reduce the risk of heart attack or reliably improve symptoms. Nonetheless, patients still expressed a desire to receive new information about the uncertain benefits of stents and wanted to have received this information early in their care.

CONCLUSION

Many patients with stable CAD do not understand the intended benefit of coronary stents and want to be informed of the evidence of uncertain benefit of coronary stents, even if this would not change their decision. Improved communication and patient education tools are needed to better inform patients. An intervention providing patients with this information early has the potential to solve these problems.

摘要

背景

越来越多的证据表明,冠状动脉支架对稳定型冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者的益处并不确定。本研究的目的是评估患者的信息需求,以及患者对有关冠状动脉支架对CAD患者益处不确定的信息的反应。

方法

对近期接受支架治疗的稳定型CAD患者进行了半结构化定性访谈(N = 20)。使用混合归纳-演绎方法对数据进行编码和分析。

结果

一些患者错误地认为他们植入支架的目的是预防未来的心脏病发作,而且很少有人之前意识到益处的不确定性。几乎所有患者都认为他们的手术取得了积极的结果,即使他们的症状仍然存在。一些患者难以接受支架可能不会降低心脏病发作风险或可靠改善症状的证据。尽管如此,患者仍然表示希望获得有关支架益处不确定的新信息,并希望在治疗早期就得到这些信息。

结论

许多稳定型CAD患者不了解冠状动脉支架的预期益处,并且希望被告知冠状动脉支架益处不确定的证据,即使这不会改变他们的决定。需要改进沟通和患者教育工具,以便更好地告知患者。早期为患者提供这些信息的干预措施有可能解决这些问题。

相似文献

1
Patient Perspectives on the Benefits and Risks of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Qualitative Study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗益处与风险的患者观点:一项定性研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Apr 12;15:721-728. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S302146. eCollection 2021.
2
How cardiologists present the benefits of percutaneous coronary interventions to patients with stable angina: a qualitative analysis.心脏病学家向稳定性心绞痛患者介绍经皮冠状动脉介入治疗益处的方法:定性分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Oct;174(10):1614-21. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3328.
3
Coronary artery stents: a rapid systematic review and economic evaluation.冠状动脉支架:一项快速系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(35):iii-iv, 1-242. doi: 10.3310/hta8350.
4
Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南。欧洲心脏病学会经皮冠状动脉介入治疗特别工作组。
Eur Heart J. 2005 Apr;26(8):804-47. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi138. Epub 2005 Mar 15.
5
API expert consensus document on management of ischemic heart disease.缺血性心脏病管理的API专家共识文件
J Assoc Physicians India. 2006 Jun;54:469-80.
6
Impact of coronary bypass or stenting on mortality and myocardial infarction in stable coronary artery disease.冠状动脉搭桥术或支架置入术对稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者死亡率和心肌梗死的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Jun 15;309:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.01.054. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
7
Comparison of a Simple Angiographic Approach With a Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery Score-Based Approach for Left Main Coronary Artery Stenting: A Pooled Analysis of Serial PRECOMBAT (Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass Surgery Versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease) Studies.比较单纯血管造影方法与紫杉醇经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和心脏手术评分方法在左主干冠状动脉支架置入中的协同作用:系列 PRECOMBAT(使用依维莫司洗脱支架在左主干冠状动脉疾病患者中进行旁路手术与血管成形术的随机比较的首项研究)的汇总分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan;11(1):e005374. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005374.
8
Coronary artery stents in the treatment of ischaemic heart disease: a rapid and systematic review.冠状动脉支架治疗缺血性心脏病:一项快速系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(23):1-153.
9
Increased C-reactive protein level after coronary stent implantation in patients with stable coronary artery disease.稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者冠状动脉支架植入术后C反应蛋白水平升高。
Am Heart J. 2003 Feb;145(2):248-53. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2003.16.
10
Predictors and variability of drug-eluting vs bare-metal stent selection in contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the PRISM study.当代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架选择的预测因素及变异性:来自PRISM研究的见解。
Clin Cardiol. 2017 Aug;40(8):521-527. doi: 10.1002/clc.22693. Epub 2017 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of a patient-centered tool to reduce misconceptions about coronary artery disease and its treatment: The CAD roadmap.一种以患者为中心的工具对减少冠状动脉疾病及其治疗误解的影响:CAD路线图。
PEC Innov. 2024 Jun 6;4:100303. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100303. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Perceived Determinants of Health-Related Behaviors Among Patients with Coronary Heart Disease After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后冠心病患者健康相关行为的感知决定因素:一项纵向定性研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Mar 6;18:591-606. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S452943. eCollection 2024.
3
Health Literacy Analytics of Accessible Patient Resources in Cardiovascular Medicine: What are Patients Wanting to Know?心血管医学中可获取患者资源的健康素养分析:患者想了解什么?
Kans J Med. 2023 Dec 31;16(3):309-315. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol16.20554. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Patient-Reported vs Physician-Estimated Angina in Patients Undergoing Elective and Urgent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.比较择期和紧急经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的患者报告和医生估计的心绞痛。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e207406. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7406.
2
Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease.稳定型冠心病的初始侵入性或保守治疗策略。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 9;382(15):1395-1407. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915922. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
3
Developing and Testing a Personalized, Evidence-Based, Shared Decision-Making Tool for Stent Selection in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using a Pre-Post Study Design.采用前后对照研究设计开发并测试一种用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中支架选择的个性化、循证共享决策工具。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Feb;12(2):e005139. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005139.
4
Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis.系列:定性研究实用指南。第 3 部分:抽样、数据收集和分析。
Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;24(1):9-18. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
5
Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial.稳定型心绞痛患者的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(ORBITA):一项双盲、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2018 Jan 6;391(10115):31-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32714-9. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
6
PCI Choice Decision Aid for Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Trial.用于稳定型冠状动脉疾病的PCI选择决策辅助工具:一项随机试验。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 Nov;9(6):767-776. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.002641. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
7
Informed Decision Making for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stable Coronary Disease.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗稳定型冠状动脉疾病的知情决策。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jul;175(7):1199-206. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1657.
8
The use of triangulation in qualitative research.三角互证法在定性研究中的应用。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014 Sep;41(5):545-7. doi: 10.1188/14.ONF.545-547.
9
How cardiologists present the benefits of percutaneous coronary interventions to patients with stable angina: a qualitative analysis.心脏病学家向稳定性心绞痛患者介绍经皮冠状动脉介入治疗益处的方法:定性分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Oct;174(10):1614-21. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3328.
10
Shared decision making in patients with stable coronary artery disease: PCI choice.稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者的共同决策:PCI 选择。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049827. Epub 2012 Nov 30.