Norton Pedro, Guimarães João Tiago, Pinho Paulo, Ribeiro Manuela, Martins Natália, Mendes Carlos Pedro
Department of Occupational Health, Centro Hospitalar São João.
EPIUnit, Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto.
Porto Biomed J. 2021 Feb 11;6(1):e088. doi: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000088. eCollection 2021 Jan-Feb.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the presence of bacterial contamination on biometric identification devices in a public hospital; identify the species of bacteria implicated in the contamination and assess bacterial recovery after the use of 2 types of disinfectants: alcohol 70% and isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine.
Before and after trial.
Public hospital, tertiary referral center.
All existing biometric identification devices in the hospital (n = 20).
Collection of 2 microbiological samples from the fingerprint reading surface of biometric devices immediately before and after applying the solution with alcohol 70% and in separate time periods with isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine.
It have been identified 21 different bacterial species in a total of 78 samples, mostly (32 samples) and (7 samples). was eliminated in 61.5% of the samples after disinfecting with alcohol 70% and in 92.3% of the samples disinfected with isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine. was eliminated in 33.3% and 100% of the samples, respectively. We found no bacterial growth in 10% of the devices after disinfection with 70% alcohol and in 78.9% of devices after disinfection with isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine. We also found that there was a decrease in the frequency of species isolated after using both disinfection solutions, although isopropyl alcohol chlorhexidine appeared to be more effective.
The biometric identification devices used in this hospital seem to be safe regardless of the products used for its cleaning. The majority of the bacteria found are commensal skin microorganisms. We did not find pathogenic bacteria for immunocompetent individuals, in particular methicillinresistant .
本研究旨在评估一家公立医院生物识别设备上细菌污染的情况;确定与污染相关的细菌种类,并评估使用两种消毒剂(70%酒精和异丙醇氯己定)后细菌的清除情况。
前后试验。
公立医院,三级转诊中心。
医院内所有现有的生物识别设备(n = 20)。
在使用70%酒精溶液和异丙醇氯己定溶液之前及之后,立即从生物识别设备的指纹读取表面采集两份微生物样本。
在总共78个样本中鉴定出21种不同的细菌,其中大多数为(32个样本)和(7个样本)。用70%酒精消毒后,61.5%的样本中被清除,用异丙醇氯己定消毒的样本中92.3%被清除。分别在33.3%和100%的样本中被清除。用70%酒精消毒后,10%的设备未发现细菌生长,用异丙醇氯己定消毒后,78.9%的设备未发现细菌生长。我们还发现,使用两种消毒溶液后分离出的菌种频率有所下降,尽管异丙醇氯己定似乎更有效。
无论使用何种清洁产品,该医院使用的生物识别设备似乎都是安全的。发现的大多数细菌是皮肤共生微生物。我们未发现免疫功能正常个体的致病细菌,尤其是耐甲氧西林的。