Department of Child Psychiatry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Sep;31(9):1391-1404. doi: 10.1007/s00787-021-01779-6. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
There has been a lack of studies on bullying in non-western low-income and middle-income countries. This study reported the prevalence of traditional victimization, cybervictimization, and the combination of these, in 13 European and Asian countries, and explored how psychiatric symptoms were associated with victimization. The data for this cross-sectional, school-based study of 21,688 adolescents aged 13-15 were collected from 2011 to 2017. The main outcomes were traditional and cybervictimization obtained from student self-reports. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire was used to assess psychiatric symptoms. Generalized estimating equation and logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). The mean prevalence of any victimization was 28.9%, of traditional victimization only, this was 17.7%, and for cybervictimization only this was 5.1%. Cybervictimization occurred both independently, and in combination with, traditional victimization. The mean prevalence of combined victimization was 6.1%. The mean proportion of those who were cyberbullied only among those who were either cyberbullied only or bullied both traditionally and in cyber was 45.1%. The rates of prevalence varied widely between countries. In the total sample, those who experienced combined victimization, reported the highest internalizing symptoms (girls, OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.22-1.29; boys, OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.25-1.33). The study findings suggest that anti-bullying interventions should include mental health components and target both traditional and cyberbullying. Due to the overlap between these, targeting bullying should primarily focus on how to reduce bullying behavior rather than just focusing on where bullying takes place.
在非西方低收入和中等收入国家,有关欺凌的研究相对较少。本研究报告了在 13 个欧洲和亚洲国家中传统受欺凌、网络受欺凌以及两者兼有的流行情况,并探讨了精神症状与受欺凌之间的关系。这项横断面、基于学校的研究共纳入了 21688 名 13-15 岁的青少年,他们的数据于 2011 年至 2017 年期间收集。主要结局指标是学生自我报告的传统受欺凌和网络受欺凌。使用《长处和困难问卷》(Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire)评估精神症状。采用广义估计方程和逻辑回归模型来估计比值比(odds ratio, OR)和 95%置信区间(95% confidence interval, 95% CI)。任何受欺凌的平均发生率为 28.9%,其中传统受欺凌的发生率为 17.7%,网络受欺凌的发生率为 5.1%。网络欺凌既可以独立发生,也可以与传统欺凌同时发生。联合受欺凌的平均发生率为 6.1%。仅网络受欺凌者中,仅网络受欺凌者和传统及网络双重受欺凌者的比例分别为 45.1%。在各国之间,流行率差异很大。在总样本中,经历联合受欺凌的人报告的内化症状最高(女生,OR 1.25,95% CI 1.22-1.29;男生,OR 1.29,95% CI 1.25-1.33)。研究结果表明,反欺凌干预措施应包括心理健康内容,并针对传统欺凌和网络欺凌。由于两者之间存在重叠,针对欺凌的干预措施应主要侧重于如何减少欺凌行为,而不仅仅是关注欺凌发生的地点。