• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扩大脑死亡器官捐献者接受标准的器官获取成本:来自成本函数模型的证据。

The organ procurement costs of expanding deceased donor organ acceptance criteria: Evidence from a cost function model.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia.

出版信息

Am J Transplant. 2021 Nov;21(11):3694-3703. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16617. Epub 2021 May 8.

DOI:10.1111/ajt.16617
PMID:33884757
Abstract

A potential solution to the deceased donor organ shortage is to expand donor acceptability criteria. The procurement cost implications of using nonstandard donors is unknown. Using 5 years of US organ procurement organization (OPO) data, we built a cost function model to make cost projections: the total cost was the dependent variable; production outputs, including the number of donors and organs procured, were the independent variables. In the model, procuring one kidney or procuring both kidneys from double/en bloc transplantation from a single-organ donor resulted in a marginal cost of $55 k (95% confidence interval [CI] $28 k, $99 k) per kidney, and procuring only the liver from a single-organ donor results in a marginal cost of $41 k (95% CI $12 k, $69 k) per liver. Procuring two kidneys for two candidates from a donor lowered the marginal cost to $36 k (95% CI $22 k, $66 k) per kidney, and procuring two kidneys and a liver lowers the marginal cost to $24 k (95% CI $17 k, $45 k) per organ. Economies of scale were observed, where high OPO volume was correlated with lower costs. Despite higher cost per organ than for standard donors, kidney transplantation from nonstandard donors remained cost-effective based on contemporary US data.

摘要

扩大供体接受标准可能是解决已故供体器官短缺的一个办法。使用非标准供体的采购成本影响尚不清楚。利用美国器官获取组织(OPO)5 年的数据,我们构建了一个成本函数模型来进行成本预测:总成本是因变量;包括供体数量和器官采集数量在内的生产产出是自变量。在该模型中,从单个供体的双器官/整块移植中获取一个肾脏或两个肾脏的边际成本为每肾 55000 美元(95%置信区间:28000 美元,99000 美元),从单个供体仅获取肝脏的边际成本为每肝 41000 美元(95%置信区间:12000 美元,69000 美元)。从供体为两名受者获取两个肾脏,将每肾的边际成本降低至 36000 美元(95%置信区间:22000 美元,66000 美元),获取两个肾脏和一个肝脏将使每器官的边际成本降低至 24000 美元(95%置信区间:17000 美元,45000 美元)。观察到规模经济,即高 OPO 量与低成本相关。尽管非标准供体的器官每例成本高于标准供体,但根据当代美国数据,非标准供体的肾脏移植仍然具有成本效益。

相似文献

1
The organ procurement costs of expanding deceased donor organ acceptance criteria: Evidence from a cost function model.扩大脑死亡器官捐献者接受标准的器官获取成本:来自成本函数模型的证据。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Nov;21(11):3694-3703. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16617. Epub 2021 May 8.
2
The cost of procuring deceased donor kidneys: Evidence from OPO cost reports 2013-2017.获取已故供体肾脏的成本:2013-2017 年 OPO 成本报告的证据。
Am J Transplant. 2020 Apr;20(4):1087-1094. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15669. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
3
The Cost of Procuring Deceased Donor Livers: Evidence From US Organ Procurement Organization Cost Reports, 2013-2018.获取已故供体肝脏的成本:来自美国器官获取组织成本报告的证据,2013-2018 年。
Clin Transplant. 2024 Sep;38(9):e15452. doi: 10.1111/ctr.15452.
4
Kidney nonprocurement in solid organ donors in the United States.美国实体器官捐献者的肾脏未被获取情况。
Am J Transplant. 2020 Dec;20(12):3413-3425. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15952. Epub 2020 May 16.
5
Examining utilization of kidneys as a function of procurement performance.考察肾脏利用情况与获取绩效之间的关系。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Jun;22(6):1614-1623. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16985. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
6
Deceased donor kidneys allocated out of sequence by organ procurement organizations.器官获取组织顺序外分配的已故供体肾脏。
Am J Transplant. 2022 May;22(5):1372-1381. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16951. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
7
Association of transplant center market concentration and local organ availability with deceased donor kidney utilization.移植中心市场集中程度和当地器官可获得性与已故供体肾脏利用的关联。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Jun;22(6):1603-1613. doi: 10.1111/ajt.17010. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
8
Association Between Organ Procurement Organization Social Network Centrality and Kidney Discard and Transplant Outcomes.器官获取组织社交网络中心性与肾脏丢弃及移植结果之间的关联
Transplantation. 2015 Dec;99(12):2617-24. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000773.
9
Organ Transplantation Outcomes of Deceased Organ Donors in Organ Procurement Organization-Based Recovery Facilities Versus Acute-Care Hospitals.器官获取组织型复苏设施与急性医疗机构中已故器官捐献者的器官移植结局比较。
Prog Transplant. 2023 Jun;33(2):110-120. doi: 10.1177/15269248231164176. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
10
Variation in use of procurement biopsies and its implications for discard of deceased donor kidneys recovered for transplantation.使用获取活检的差异及其对为移植而回收的已故供体肾脏废弃的影响。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Aug;19(8):2241-2251. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15325. Epub 2019 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
The Medical Costs of Determining Eligibility and Waiting for a Kidney Transplantation.确定资格和等待肾脏移植的医疗费用。
Med Care. 2024 Aug 1;62(8):521-529. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002028. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
2
Preemptive Living-Related Kidney Transplantation Is a Cost-Saving Strategy Compared With Post-dialysis Kidney Transplantation in Thailand.在泰国,与透析后肾移植相比,抢先进行的亲属活体肾移植是一种节省成本的策略。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 8;9:869535. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.869535. eCollection 2022.
3
Trends in Cost Attributable to Kidney Transplantation Evaluation and Waiting List Management in the United States, 2012-2017.
美国 2012-2017 年用于肾移植评估和候补名单管理的成本变化趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e221847. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.1847.